Unit 1 - Electoral Systems Flashcards

0
Q

Proportional electoral systems

A

Direct relationship between % of seats and % Of votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Majoritarian electoral system

A

A system which promotes a single party majority government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples of Landslide effect

A

2001 Lab 167 seat majority
1997 Lab 179 seat majority
1983 Cons 144 seat majority under thatcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why do MPs in England lack a majority mandate?

A

2/3 have a plurality but not a majority of votes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where is the AMS used?

A

Scottish Parliament
Welsh assembly
Greater London assembly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where is the STV system used?

A

Northern Ireland Assembly and Local Governments

Scottish Local government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Party list system examples

A

EU parliament
Israel
Denmark
Finland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where is the SV used

A

London mayor elections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

WHere is AV used?

A

Australia Lower House

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does SV work?

A

2 preferences.

Majority (50% needed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does AV work

A

Rank candidates in order of preference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of AV/SV

A
  1. Fewer wasted votes
  2. Greater accountability as single party govt is formed
  3. Strong and stable govt
  4. Majority mandate held by MP
  5. More legitimate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disadvantages of AV/SV

A
  1. Not proportional
  2. Tactical voting
  3. Some votes are counted more than others
  4. Unequal strength of 1st and second preference votes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the AMS in Scotland

A

73 seats selected with FPTP

56 seats selected with party list (as top up)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Droop formula

A

STV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

D’Hondt formula

A

Party list

16
Q

Advantages of party list

A
  1. Simple to use and count
  2. Proportional - democratic legitimacy
  3. Very few wasted votes
  4. More diverse candidates/greater pluralism
  5. Party controls list and so could resolve the issue of descriptive representation in the UK
17
Q

Disadvantages of party list

A
  1. Parties have significant power in candidate ranking
  2. No MP-constituency link
  3. Limited choice
  4. Political fragmentation through coalition
18
Q

Advantages of STV

A
  1. Wide voter choice
  2. Proportional
  3. Pluralistic
  4. Fewer wasted votes
  5. Link between voters and constituency remains
  6. Eliminates need for tactical voting
19
Q

Disadvantages of STV

A
  1. Extremely complicated
  2. Takes a lot of time
  3. Could lead to ‘donkey voting’
  4. Doesn’t produce majority governments
  5. Leads to intraparty competition
20
Q

Results of 2010 election

A

Lib Dem 23% of votes 9 % of seats
Labour 29% of votes 39.7 % of seats
Conservatives 36% of vote and 47 % of seats

21
Q

Arguments for FPTP

A
  1. Existed for long time and widely accepted
  2. Easy to understand
  3. Retains strong MP - constituency link
  4. Ensures single party strong governments
  5. Greater accountability
22
Q

Arguments against FPTP

A
  1. Disproportional - public not fully represented
  2. Wasted votes
  3. Votes are not of equal value
  4. Discriminates against smaller parties
  5. Systematic bias towards Labour
  6. Weak mandate as 2/3 of MPs don’t have majority mandate
  7. Elective dictatorship
23
Q

Arguments for a proportional system

A
  1. Fair and proportional
  2. Fewer wasted votes
  3. Turnout may increase
  4. Help smaller parties - improved representation
  5. Reduces possibility of elective dictatorship.
  6. Pluralism
24
Q

Arguments against proportional system

A
  1. Current system works fine
  2. Other systems are too difficult
  3. Prone to extreme parties
  4. Weak and unstable government
  5. Some systems destroy MP - constituency link
  6. Public do not want a proportional system as evident by 2011 AV REFERENDUM
25
Q

Elections stats

A
1992 - 77.7%
1997 - 71.4%
2001 - 59.4% 
2005 - 61.4%
2010 - 65.1%