Unit 2 Managing NGO Relations Flashcards

0
Q

The 3 steps of a stakeholder analysis

A

Step 1. identifying the stakeholders + make interest/benefit matrix
Step 2. importance & influence analysis
Step 3. Stakeholder matrix (importance/influence matrix)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Definitions:

  • Stakeholder
  • Key Stakeholder
  • Primary Stakeholder
  • Secondary Stakeholder
A

Stakeholder: persons, groups or institutions with interests in a project, programme or organisation

Key Stakeholders: those who can significantly influence or are important to the success of an activity

Primary Stakeholders: those who are ultimately affected by an activity (positive or negatively)

Secondary Stakeholders: all others with a stake, interest or role in the activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Principle-Agent theory

A

Agent A is accountable to Principal B when A is morally and legally obliged to serve the purpose of B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why does the principle-agent theory not work with NGO’s?

A
  1. NGO’s are not accountable to one stakeholder (principle) but to many.
  2. the theory suggests that donors would be the principles HOWEVER NGO’s work for the interests of a target group/clients/beneficiaries and make promisses to staff, partners and others.

(Brown and Moore, 2001):
Should those with the gold make the rules? Or should those for whose benefit an organisation exists call the shots?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4 accountabilities for NGOs

A

Upward - funders & legal obligations (also board etc)
Downward - clients & beneficiaries & partners (in case of Cap building)
Horizontal - consortium, alliance members, peers / fellow professionals
Inward - internal organisational missions and values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reasons why the sector is vulnarable to external criticism and internal anxieties:

A
  1. absence of a clear principal stakeholder to whome NGOs give account
  2. difficulties in balancing the expectations of different stakeholders
  3. lack of strong accountability mechanism for any stakeholder to assert control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Accountability Gap

A

the absence of a mechanism by which the constituents of NGOs can enforce accountability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The key drivers for accountability for NGO’s:

A

(SustainAbility, 2003)

  1. morality - accountability is right in principle
  2. performance - accountability improves effectiveness
  3. political space - accountability increases credibility and thus influence
  4. wider democratisation - accountability of NGOs improves democracy in society

The key&raquo_space;> transparancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

9x accountability mechanisms, tools and processes available to NGOs

A
  1. Mission and vision statements
  2. Board of trustees
  3. Annual reports and disclosure statements
  4. Elections
  5. Internal self regulation mechanisms (40 internationally)
  6. Performance assessment and evaluation processes
  7. Standards and codes of conduct
  8. Certification and accreditation schemes
  9. Social audit and other methods of participation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Concerns regarding the increased focus on accountability (Accra HLF, 2008)

A
  1. focus on upwards accountability with little attention to downwards
  2. focus on practical accountability forgetting strategical
  3. costs are disproportionately high, rewards limited while with failure there is punishment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Development of an accountability strategy:

A
  1. map and analyse the relationships with stakeholders
  2. assess the S+W of the current accountability mechanism with each stakeholder
  3. address the weaknesses with strengthening/new mechanisms relative to the importance of the relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2 likely forms of government’s relationships with the NGO community:

A
  1. Repression, rivalry and competition (challenging relationships)
  2. Cooperation, complementarity and collaboration (partnership)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Government strategies in response to adversarial relations with NGO’s

A
  1. encourage dependency through funding, thereby reducing NGO autonomy and independence
  2. develop cooptation through increased involvement in policy making committees and structures (gaining ideas and commitment from NGOs and neutralising critique)
  3. introduce or strengthen regulation mechanisms, thereby reducing NGO energies and blurring their vision for actual work and contribution
  4. Intimidation and harassment through the law and order apparatus of the State
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Definition Partnership

A

(Fowler, 2000)

Authentic partnership implies…join commitment to long-term interaction, shared responsibility for achievement, reciprocal obligation, equality, mutuality and balance of power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 different forms of relations donor and other NGOs

A
  • Partnerships
  • Subsidiaries
  • Networks and alliances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

5 forms of cooperation among NGO’s

A

(Fowler, 1997)

  1. Networks
  2. Alliances
  3. Consortia
  4. Coalitions
  5. Coordinating bodies
16
Q

Partnerships between development NGOs in North & South can be advantageous because of 3 principle reasons:

A
  1. build on the comparative advantage of both organisations due to their relative proximities to key constituencies and stakeholders
  2. they suggest a relationship built on equality and mutual respect
  3. They can outlast simple projects or programmes and therefore have the potential to promote organisational relationships and capacity building.
17
Q

the Mango Checklist

A

Management Accounting for NGOs - judge the strength of the organisations accountability to beneficiaries.

  1. providing information
  2. social structures
  3. making decisions
  4. complaints procedures
  5. staff attitudes
18
Q

Building accountability systems according to Fowler, 2000 (book)

A
  1. identifying and prioritizing organisational stakeholders
  2. setting standards and performance measures
  3. assessing and communicating performance results
  4. creating performance consequences by which stakeholders can hold the CSo accountable
19
Q

The two risks of new roles NGO’s (last decade)

A
  1. as service providers: supply-side extension of government

2. as facilitators and enablers of civic engagement: associated with opposition political groups

20
Q

Accra High Level Forum - International Aid Transparancy Intiative

A
  • donors will publicly disclose development expenditures
  • donors and development countries will make public conditions
  • donors report on annual committments
  • donor reports on 3-5 year forward expediture