unit 2 human rights Flashcards

1
Q

development of human rights

A

Example: development of women’s’ rights

  • Women were not elected in Australia’s Commonwealth Parliament until 1943.

still unequal treatment today.

  • Australian woman are paid 17.5% less than men for doing the same work. This means that they would have to work an extra 64 days a year to get the same pay as men doing the same work.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are human rights

A

human rights are basic moral or legal entitlements that exist for all human beings irrespective of any personal characteristics

The moral doctrine of human rights aims at identifying the fundamental prerequisites for each human being leading a minimally good life beyond mere survival.

Calling them ‘rights’ suggests that they attach to individuals who can invoke them, that they are of high priority and that compliance with them is mandatory rather than discretionary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

international human rights law

A

International law is separate from Australian domestic law.

International human rights law establishes principles and guidelines about how Australia should treat its citizens but it generally does not govern the behaviour and conduct of Australian citizens.

The latter is the responsibility of Australian domestic law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

international declaration

A

non- binding agreement that sets out aspirations / intentions of countries (or international organizations) Who
are party to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

international treaties

A

legally binding agreements between countries (or international organizations) in which they undertake to follow the obligations set out in the agreement and Implement them in domestic law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

universal declaration of human rights- UDHR

A

sets out fundamental human rights that should be universally protected and respected.

The UDHR has now been adopted all 192 members of the UN.

The UDHR has been translated into 337 different languages

UDHR is not legally binding It has inspired the creation of more than 80 international treaties, declarations and agreements including:

  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

two types of international agreements relevant to human rights:

A
  • International declarations
  • International treaties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

examples of the UDHR articles

A

The Declaration consists of 30 articles covering a wide range of rights and freedoms, including:

the right to life, liberty, and security;

freedom from torture and arbitrary arrest;

the right to a fair trial;

freedom of thought, conscience, and religion;

and the right to participate in government and free elections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

step 1 to an international treaty

A

Step 1: Signing a treaty demonstrates a country’s intention to incorporate it into domestic law later.

  • E.g. Australia signed the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in 1966.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

step 2 to an international treaty

A

Step 2: Ratifying a treaty requires a country to pass domestic legislation to approve and adopt the rights outlined in the treaty, whereby becoming legally bound.

  • E.g. Australia ratified the CERD by passing the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

aims of UDHR

A

aims to promote peace, dignity, and justice for all people around the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the UDHR being translated into 337 different languages indicate

A

indicating its global significance as gov from across the world are all able to comprehend the Declaration and implement the text accordingly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

HR protections via statute law

A

Most human rights in Australia are recognised in and protected by statute law, created by both commonwealth and state parliaments.

*a range of both federal and state laws protect individuals from discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, disability and other characteristics

  • However, statutes may also establish exceptions to the general principles against discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HR exemptions of discrimination example

A

o S38 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)

lawful for a school to engage in discriminatory practices against a potential employee based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, or pregnancy if the school adheres to specific teachings about a particular religion. If such discrimination is carried out to protect the individual, it is considered lawful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

HR protections via statute law examples S16

A
  • S16 Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) = unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a person based on their gender, for example, ‘when determining who should be offered employment’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

HR protections via statute law examples S12

A
  • S12 Racial Discrimination act 1975 (Cth)= unlawful to refuse a person residential accommodation on basis of their race, nationality or ethnicity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

weaknesses of statute law

A

Because parliament is the supreme lawmaking body, it can amend statutes and charters, so rights may become limited or no longer exist

Parliament can include limitations or restrictions in statutes or charters so protected rights are not always absolute

Statutes and charters do not always enable a person to be awarded any damages in the event their rights are breached

The rights protected in statute law and charters are not as well protected as rights contained in a constitution, as constitutional rights can only be altered or removed with public approval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

strengths of statute law

A

Parliament can amend statutes and charters to incorporate further rights, particularly as society changes

Statutes and charters are often detailed and precise, and protect human rights specifically, rather than being implied

Rights contained in statutes are generally enforceable and need to be recognised by government organisations

Parliament does have the ability to pass laws quickly if there is a need to quickly protect additional rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Victorian charter of human rights and responsibilities

A

recognizes the basic rights, freedoms and responsibilities of Victorians

The Charter requires MPs to explicitly articulate whether new legislation upholds or restricts the rights in the Charter through Statements of Compatibility

*MPs are discouraged from introducing laws that breach human rights due to political backlash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

weakness of charter

A

The 20 human rights established in the Charter are not absolute or unrestricted.

  • The Charter includes a ‘general limitations clause’ which allows public authorities (including Victorian Parliament and Government) to restrict human rights in situations where it is reasonable and justified to uphold a free and democratic society.
  • Although the Charter promotes human rights in Victoria, it has no impact on new laws developed by the Commonwealth Parliament. As Commonwealth laws usually apply to all Australians, they may infringe upon the rights of Victorians.
  • The Charter does not establish a right for Victorians to bring a case against the Victorian Parliament for creating laws that breach the Charter.
  • Laws created prior to 2006 did not require a Statement of Compatibility and the human rights implications of many laws may not have been debated or considered.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

strength of charter on public authorities

A
  • The Charter imposes obligations on public authorities (e.g. Vic Police, local councils, Department of Education) to act compatibly with human rights and give proper consideration to human rights when making decisions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

strength of charter on tribunals

A
  • Courts and tribunals must interpret all Victorian laws in a way that upholds the human rights outlined in the Charter, as far as this is possible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

strength + weakness of charter on supreme court

A
  • The Supreme Court has the power to declare that a law or provision is inconsistent with human rights

but does not have the power to strike it down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

courts creating new human rights eg Dietrich V the Queen 1992

A

The right of an accused to have legal representation was recognised by the high court in the case.

After the unrepresented Dietrich was sentenced to imprisonment and appealed, the High Court recognised the right of an accused to obtain legal representation when facing a serious criminal charge to actualise the right to a fair trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

courts strengthening statutory rights eg Barwon prison

A

When the government’s decision to transfer children to Barwon Prison was declared unlawful, the Supreme Court strengthened rights under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities including the right to humane treatment when being detained.

certain children V minister for families and children 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

strengths of common law

A

The courts and judges are independent of parliament and can establish precedent free from political pressures

Courts and judges are able to make decisions to establish rights in areas where the parliament has not

The courts are able to infer rights without the need to consider now those rights may need to be limited

Courts are able to highlight to parliament gaps in the law that protect rights, which may encourage parament to change the law to farther protect rights’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

weakness of common law

A

Common Law rights are not always easy to define or identity as opposed to statutory rights)

Courts must wait for a case to come before them to be able to declare the existence of rights

Parliament, as the supreme law-making body, can abrogate common law rights

Often judges are reluctant to recognise certain rights such as the right to privacy, leaving it up to parliament to protect those rights

Judges are limited in applying the law to the case that is before them. They cannot simply create rights’ in any dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

strength of charter

A

The Charter ensures human rights issues are considered and debated publicly when proposed legislation is tabled in Victoria. This creates a political risk for law-makers to introduce laws breaching human rights, discouraging MPs from doing so.

The process of requiring a Statement of Compatibility to be produced for all proposed legislation in Victoria ensures complex issues regarding human rights are debated and resolved publicly, by democratically-elected law-makers.

The Charter imposes obligations on public authorities to consider human rights. This constrains abuses of power by Victoria Police, for example.

Unlike the Constitution, which only contains five explicitly-protected rights, the Charter has a greater number of established rights including 20 fundamental rights, therefore explicitly indicating the rights Victorians should expect to be awarded in society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

more weakness of charter

A

The VCHRR does not establish the right for Victorians to bring a case against parliament for creating a law that breaches the rights of the Charter.

Charter was only created in 2006, legislation created prior to 2006, may not have been analysed to consider the Charter’s human rights.
As a Statement of Compatibility was not required when these laws were created, Members of Parliament may not have considered the human rights implications during the law-making process.

The VCHRR applies only to new laws being considered in Victoria. It has no impact on new laws developed in the Commonwealth Parliament. Laws created by the Commonwealth are usually applicable to all Australians and may therefore infringe upon the rights of Victorians.

Although the VCHRR requires Victorian law-makers to explicitly consider whether new laws violate human rights, it does not stop such laws from being created.

30
Q

constitution

A

The founding document that outlines how Australia is to be governed. For example, the Constitution establishes the Commonwealth Parliament and outlines its structure and law-making powers.

31
Q

referendum

A

A method used for changing the wording of the Australian Constitution. A compulsory national vote in which everyone on the electoral roll votes ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to alter the Constitution.

32
Q

double majority

A

What is required for a referendum to be successful?

A double majority - a national majority of all voters in Australia AND a majority of voters in a majority of states (i.e. at least 4 states).

33
Q

the five express rights

A

The Australian Constitution protects five express rights of the Australian people.

An express right is explicitly stated (or entrenched) in the wording of the Constitution and can only be altered or removed by through a successful referendum.

34
Q

section 51 (xxxi)

A

the right to receive just terms when property is acquired by the Commonwealth

35
Q

section 80

A

the right to trial by jury for Commonwealth indictable offences

36
Q

section 92

A

the right to free interstate trade and commerce

37
Q

section 116

A

the right to freedom of religion

38
Q

section 117

A

the right not to be discriminated against based on your state of residence

39
Q

strengths of section 51 xxxi

A
  • The Commonwealth cannot pass a law taking a person’s or company’s land or possessions unless fair and reasonable compensation is provided.
40
Q

weakness of section 51 xxxi

A

*Section 51(xxxi) does not prevent the Commonwealth from acquiring property from Australian citizens.

  • There is no specification or statement on what constitutes ‘just terms’, potentially leading to some unsatisfactory outcomes for landowners.
  • This section does not apply to the states.
41
Q

strengths of section 80

A
  • This applies for individuals who have been charged with offences such as terrorism, people smuggling, drug importation, fraud
  • The Commonwealth cannot legislate to have indictable offences tried by a judge alone, which enhances a fair trial.
42
Q

weakness of section 80

A
  • Many criminal offences are created by state laws (e.g.Crimes Act 1958 (Vic)) and this section does not apply to the states.
43
Q

strengths of section 116

A
  • The Commonwealth Parliament cannot pass a law that imposes or bans a religion
  • A person cannot be denied a position in the Commonwealth Parliament or related positions because of their religious beliefs.
44
Q

weakness of section 116

A
  • This section does not apply to the states.

*A law that has the effect of forcing a person to do something their religion prohibits does not necessarily breach s 116 - e.g. laws conscripting individuals to fight in
a war

45
Q

strengths of section 117

A

*The Commonwealth Parliament cannot pass a law that treats Victorians less favorably than New South Wales citizens

  • States cannot pass laws that impose a burden on a person because they live in a different state
46
Q

weakness of section 117

A
  • Some laws that legislate upon residents of different states
    in a restrictive manner may be acceptable - e.g. a
    Victorian law that prevents residents of NSW from voting in Victorian elections would not breach s117.

*Relatively few High Court cases have involved the
interpretation of s117 and, as a result, it remains unclear which laws would or would not violate s117.

47
Q

enforceability of express and implied

A
  • All rights protected by the Constitution, both express and implied, are fully enforceable by the High Court
  • If a party believes legislation created by parliament infringes a constitutionally protected right, they can challenge the validity of the law in the High Court.
    However, the individual bringing the claim must have standing to sue (i.e. must be affected by or have special interest in the law)
  • The High Court can then declare the law unconstitutional and invalid.
48
Q

strengths of section 92

A
  • Both Commonwealth and state parliaments cannot
    pass laws that restrict free movement of goods or individuals between states - e.g. a Victorian Law imposing a tax on furniture made in New South Wales would be invalid
49
Q

weakness of section 92

A

Palmer V Western Australia (2021)
*High court stated that laws that restrict interstate movement of ppl w/o discrimination =acceptable

*A law that has some other legitimate purpose but has the side effect of restricting movement between states might be valid

50
Q

parliaments options when High Court declares the law unconstitutional and invalid.

A

Amend the legislation to remove the unconstitutional sections

Change the Constitution by holding a referendum

51
Q

implied rights

A

Implied rights are rights that are not explicitly stated in the wording of the Constitution but are considered (implied) to exist through interpretation of the High Court.

  • Implied rights are also fully enforceable. This means a person or organisation that is negatively affected by legislation breaching the implied right can challenge the law’s validity in the High Court, so long as they have standing to do so.
52
Q

what does the right of FOPC protect

A

Sections 7 and 24 requires the senate and HOR to be directly chosen by the people.

For example, although the Constitution does not explicitly state that Australians have the right to freedom of political communication, the High Court has decided that this freedom is implied and protected.

53
Q

weakness of implied constitutional rights

A

Very few human rights are expressly protected by the Constitution. The human rights that are expressly protected are very limited in scope (e.g. the limited right to a trial by jury) and act more as a restriction on parliament’s
law-making than a positive right

It is expensive and time-consuming to take a case to the High Court to challenge a statute that breaches any right contained in the Constitution

The High Court cannot interpret the meaning of the Constitution and declare an infringement of rights until a relevant case is brought before it

54
Q

strengths of implied constitutional rights

A

The implied right to freedom of political communication shows that human rights can be implied or recognised by the High Court even though they may not be expressly written in the Constitution

All rights, including human rights, protected by the Constitution are fully enforceable through the High Court, and any statute found to breach those rights can be declared invalid

The High Court can interpret the meaning of the words and phrases in the Australian Constitution, so it can keep pace with changes in community values and remain relevant over time

55
Q

how is the right of FOPC protect

A

Section 7 and 24 require the house of Commonwealth parliament to be ‘directly chosen by the people’ (ie be a representative government). To make an informed decision at an election, a citizen must be able to obtain info about the political views of the candidates

56
Q

nature of the right to freedom of religion UDHR in Australia

A

Australia was one of the original countries to support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR’).

Article 18 states we all have the right to our beliefs, to have and practice a religion, have no religion or to change our beliefs and religion.

57
Q

development of the right to freedom of religion- international law

A

the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion was included in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (‘ICCPR’).

The ICCPR is one of the seven major international human rights treaties adopted by Australia and reflected in our domestic law.

In addition, section 14 of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights protects Victorians’ freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief.

58
Q

development of the right to freedom of religion- statue law

A

Commonwealth and State parliaments have passed legislation that protects the right to freedom of religion.

For example, the following laws make it unlawful to discriminate against a person based on their religion or belief in employment, accommodation, education, membership and sport etc.

  • Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
  • Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Vic)
  • Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic)
59
Q

development of the right to freedom of religion- constitution

A

Section 116 of the Constitution provides Australians with a limited right to freedom of religion. The Commonwealth Parliament cannot pass a law that:

  • Establishes an official, national religion
  • Imposes any religious observance
  • Prohibits the free exercise of any religion. However, this can be limited if the practicing of a religion breaches
    Australian law or threatens national security.
  • Requires a religious test as a requirement for holding any Commonwealth office (e.g. working as a member of the Federal Police)
60
Q

impact of the High Court’s ruling in the DOGS case on the constitutional protection of the right to freedom of religion:

A

Narrows the scope of the application of 116. Only legislation created for the sole purpose of establishing a national religion will be invalidated.

61
Q

impact of the High Court’s ruling in the DOGS case on the human rights of individuals:

A

*Promotes the right for religious school students to learn about and practice their religion.
*Promotes the right to education.
*Ensures schools are not being withheld finding due to their religion

62
Q

DOGS case 1981

A

DOGS (Defence of Government Schools) group believed that legislation allowing Commonwealth Parliament to fund religious schools was akin to imposing a national religion and therefore in breach of s116.

The High Court rejected the DOGS argument and found the legislation was valid. The legislation was for educational purposes as opposed to creating a national religion.

63
Q

Religious Discrimination Bill (Cth)

A

anti-discrimination provisions to prohibit discrimination against people on the basis of their religious beliefs or lack of religious beliefs.

It provides a defence for potentially harmful or humiliating statements in public arenas such as education or people’s place of employment which may otherwise amount to unlawful discrimination, so long as these statements are in good faith and reflect a person’s religious belief.

64
Q

arguments for religious discrimination bill

A

Strengthen discrimination law by adding religion as a protected characteristic (alongside race, sex etc.) / fills in the gaps of the statutory discrimination protections

Protects people from making genuine, honestly held statements based on their religious beliefs
-e.g. preventing Israel Folau from being fired after making statements about gay people on his personal social media

65
Q

arguments against religious discrimination bill

A

Governmental review found that the bill is not needed as religious freedoms are not in any immanent peril

Inherent tension between statements of religious belief and discrimination. For example, allowing religious organisations to make comments or hire/fire people based on characteristics of marital status or sexual orientation impacts the rights of those protected individuals

‘statements of belief’ that does not harass, vilify or intimidate in the 2021 bill is ambiguous and would require statutory interpretation

66
Q

conflicting views of religious discrimination bill

A

After the Religious Discrimination Bill 2019 (Cth) was strongly criticised by various human rights organisations, it was revised and reintroduced into Parliament in November 2021.

  • However, the new bill contained yet another controversial section, one which would allow individuals to make ‘statements of belief that otherwise might breach anti-discrimination laws, provided that the statement did not harass, threaten, intimidate or vilify a person or group.
  • After much criticism, the bill was passed by the House of Representatives in February 2022 but failed to pass the Senate before the May 2022 election and thus lapsed.
67
Q

what does the right of freedom of political communication empower

A

The right to freedom of political communication empowers Australians to freely discuss and debate political issues, subject to certain restrictions.

68
Q

lowering the voting age

A
  • There has been growing pressure to lower the voting age in Australia.
  • A number of options have been put forward:
    Allowing 16- and 17-years olds to vote but not making it compulsory
  • Making it compulsory for 16- and 17-year-olds to vote but without imposed fines if they choose not to
69
Q

arguments for lowering age

A
  • The Human Rights Law Centre supports lowering the age to 16 as young people are ‘most likely to feel the long-term effects of today’s political decisions’

Many young people are educated and interested in a range of political issues such as housing affordability, homelessness, mental health care and the human rights of minority groups

Some argue denying young people the right to vote is a breach of their human rights. In 2022,
New Zealand’s highest court ruled that the voting age of 18 discriminated against young people and breached their rights.

70
Q

Australian Capital television Pty Ltd V commonwealth 1992

A

creation of implied rights under s7 and 24 of constitutions

In 1991 Cth PImt passed an Act to restrict political advertising during election campaigns. The plaintiff, Aus Capital Television + State of NSW challenged the validity of the act in the HC (only court w jurisdiction in const. matters) because they questioned whether the Act was constitutionally invalid.
The case was decided in 1992 and resulted in the Act declared invalid and the right to Freedom of political comm was implied. The court came to this decision through the HC interpreted s7 + 24 of Const. as establishing representative govt. which in turn requires FoPC

71
Q

roach case

A

Roach v Electoral Commissioner 2007 is a High Court of Australia case, decided in 2007, dealing with the validity of Commonwealth legislation that prevented prisoners from voting. The Court held that the 2006 amendments were inconsistent with the system of representative democracy established by the Constitution.