Unit 2: Divorce/Dissolution Flashcards
Matrimonial Causes Act 1857
Pre-MCA there was no juducisal process; divorce required Act of parliament. only basis for divorce was adultery. only available to women if could demonstrate additional aggravating factor e.g. incest
Matrimonial Causes Act 1937
added additional grounds for divorce e.g. cruelty, desertion, insanity. first time able to obtain divorce without fault i.e. insanity
Divorce Reform Act 1969
societal pressure to reform law on divorce; freedom of choice and acceptance. breakdown of marriage sole reason for divorce using one of 5 facts
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s3
Bar on divorce for on year - unable to divorce for any circumstances. Designed to ensure couples take marriage seriously by imposing absolute threshold
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s1(1)
a petition to divorce may be presented to the court by either party to a marriage on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down
The 5 facts
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s1(2)(a) Adultery
the respondent has committed adultery i.e. sexual intercourse with someone of the opposite sex AND
the petitioner finds it intolerable to live with the respondent
The 5 facts
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s1(2)(b) Behaviour
The respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent
The 5 facts
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s1(2)(c) Desertion
The respondent has deseretd the petitioner for a period of at least 2 years:
physical separation; against petitioner’s wishes; for no justifiable reason
The 5 facts
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s1(2)(d) 2 years separation w/ consent
parties have lived apart for at least 2 years and the respondent consents
The 5 facts
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s1(2)(e) 5 years separation
parties have lived apart for at least 5 years
Katz v Katz (1972)
s1(2)(b) Behaviour
behaviour is action or conduct by one person which effects the other. must be more than a mere state of affairs or state of mind
Livingstone Stallard v Livingstone Stallard (1974)
s1(2)(b) Behaviour
two limb test to determine whether petitioner can reasonably be expected to live with the petitioner:
- is it reasonable? (objective)
- is it reasonable for a couple with their character and personalities (subjective)
Buffery v Buffery (1988)
satisfied marriage irretriebly broken down (s1(1) MCA 1973). Reason for petitioning was that couple had grown apart. insufficient to satisfy one of the five facts under s1(2) MCA 1973 so unable to get divorce