Unit 1: Marriage/Civil partnerships Flashcards
Gina and Helga entered into a Civil Partnership in 2009. They now wish to be married to each other.
They can convert their civil partnership into a marriage under s9 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013
Definition of marriage
“I conceive that marriage may… be defined as the voluntary union for life of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others” per Lord Penzance
Hyde v Hyde (1866)
Key formalities
- Publicity: must be publicised beforehand to allow objections. Normally by way of notice in the registry office.
- Registration: entered on register
- Ceremony:
A. Exchange of vows
B: ceremony must be open to the public
C. Witnesses (at least 2)
D. Venue must be licensed for marriages
E. Authorised person present to conduct the ceremony e.g. registrar
McCabe v McCabe (1994)
Facts: Irish man and Ghanaian woman. Ghanaian custom whereby man paid woman’s family £100 and a bottle of whisky, which was then shared with the wife’s relatives.
Held: viewed as a valid marriage as met Ghanaian legal requirements at that time
Capacity to marriage
Under s11 MCA 1973 there are 3 elements which must be satisfied to establish capacity:
- Age: over 16; if under 18 parental consent required
- Unmarried: polygamy prohibited
- Prohibited degrees of relationship i.e. not closely related
Prohibited degrees of relationship
Marriage Act 1949 Sch 1
Adoptive child Adoptive parent Child Grandparent Grandchild Parent Parent’s sibling Sibling
Corbett v Corbett (1971)
Biological sex is fixed at birth. Historically posed problems for transgender people. Since overridden by statute: Gender Recognition Act 2004
Void marriages
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s11
- Age (s11(a)(ii)
- Existing marriages (s11(b))
- Prohibited Degrees (s11(a)(i)
- Intermarry in disregard of certain requirements as to formation of marriage under s49 Marriage Act 1949 (s11(a)(iii)) - only if parties knowingly and willfully disregarded requirements
Voidable marriages
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s12
Marriage not automatically void but either party may
MCA 1973 s12(a)
marriage not consummated owing to incapacity
MCA 1973 s12(b)
not consummated owing to wilful refusal
MCA 1973 s12(c)
either party did not validly consent… whether consequence of duress, mistake, unsoundness of mind or otherwise
MCA 1973 s12(d)
at time of marriage, though capable of giving consent, was suffering (continuously or intermittently) from mental disorder under Mental Health Act 1983 of such kind or to such extent as to be unfitted for marriage
MCA 1973 s12(e)
At the time of the marriage the respondent was suffering from venereal disease in a communicable form
MCA 1973 s12(f)
at time of marriage the respondent was pregnant by some person other than the petitioner
MCA 1973 s12(g)
interim gender recognition certificate under GRA 2004 has, after the time of the marriage, been issued
MCA 1973 s12(h)
Respondent is a person whose gender at the time of the marriage had become the acquired gender under GRA 2004
Hirani v Hirani (1983)
Ormerod LJ
Test for Duress
19 year old woman entered marriage under pressure exerted by parents. Sir Jocelyn Simon in Szechter v Szechter, stringent objective test = genuinely and reasonably held fear… immediate threat to life, limb or liberty. Ormerod applied Singh v Kaur - distinction between disagreeable situation and real threat
Test - threats and pressures such to destroy the reality of consent
Singh v Singh (1971)
incapacity not limited to physical incapacity - also includes repugnance, psychiatric or sexual aversion
Houghton v Houghton (1947)
must show definite and settled decision not to consummate
Hudson v Leigh (2009)
whether or not non-marriage must be considered on case by case basis. general factors:
- whether ceremony set out/purported to be lawful marriage
- whether bore all hallmarks of marriage
- whether couple/officiating officer believed, intended and understood ceremony to be lawful
- reasonable perceptions of those in attendance
HM Attorney-Geneal v Akhter (2020)
islamic ceremony conducted in restaurant. Knew has no legal effect. Intended to be followed by civil ceremony. CoA held: not qualifying ceremony and does not create void marriage; not married under provision of MA 1949 e.g. no notice, not registered building, no certificates, no registrar/authorised persons
A v A (2012)
registration requirements not complied with. Religious ceremony (mosque) conducted by non-authorised person in presence of authorised person. held: valid marriage.. although not registered place both parties wanted marriage to be legal and lived 5 years in belief it was
Chief Adjudication Officer v Bath (2000)
building not being registered is not necessarily fatal to marriage being valid