Unit 2: Background/Foreground in Narrative Flashcards
What are the differences in reported speech between Greek and English?
When reporting speech, Greek retains the tense of the original statement (which is called “direct speech”). In other words, someone who originally learned of Jesus’ whereabouts would have said ἐν οἴκῳ ἐστίν (“he is at home”). This is direct speech, that is, what the words would be if placed in quotation marks. When this direct speech is reported by someone else, it becomes “indirect speech.” In other words, in the statement “they heard that he was at home,” the direct speech “he is at home” has now become indirect speech. Here is the important point: in English the verb tense shifts when moving from direct speech to indirect speech (here from “ is at home” to “ was at home”); in Greek this shift does not happen. As a result the present tense ἐστίν here sounds strange to us; in English you will need to translate this indirect speech with “was” rather than “is.”
Why is foreground important? (aka mainline)
foreground is needed to tell the story and advance it (provides the skeleton of the story or argument)
Why is background important? (aka offline)
background is needed to set the scene and provide the framework (fleshes out the story or argument)
What question do you ask to recognize background?
- How is the information of a given clause or sentence relates to the wider context?
- Is the information contextualizing movement of a story or argument?
(In order to answer this question, you have to be aware of both the wider context and the genre of the text.)
What question do you ask to recognize foreground?
- Is the information extending the principal movement of a story or argument?
(In order to answer this question, you have to be aware of both the wider context and the genre of the text.)
In relation to the narrative genre, how is background recognized?
will typically be information that sets the scene or comments on the foreground information
In relation to the narrative genre, how is foreground recognized?
will tend to be that which communicates the next event or the next action taken by a character (narratives are typically organized around temporal succession and characters’ actions)
In relation to the nonnarrative genre, how is foreground recognized?
information comprised of instructions, commands, and teachings
What tenses and mood are verbs typically in that are foreground? And What tenses and mood are verbs typically in that are background?
- aorist indicative
- historical presents
- imperfect indicatives
- perfect indicatives
[it is important to affirm that there is only a correlation between perfective aspect and foreground, not a one-to-one correspondence. Similarly, there is only a correlation between imperfective aspect and background, not a one-to-one correspondence. In other words, while paying attention to aspect provides a helpful clue in determining background and foreground, it does not definitively determine whether a verb conveys background or foreground information. More specifically, while aorist indicatives (perfective in aspect) typically structure the storyline of a narrative, sometimes aorist indicatives can encode background information (especially in subordinate clauses, in main clauses introduced by γάρ, or when nonevents). Even less consistent are imperfect indicatives (imperfective in aspect). Although they frequently serve to background information, they sometimes encode foregrounded information. This is because the main function of imperfect indicatives is not to encode background but rather (in keeping with its imperfective aspect) to portray action as being in process at that particular point in the narrative.]
When are participles typically foreground and when primarily background?
- adverbial participial phrases can be part of the mainline if they follow their main clause (such as φέροντες πρὸς αὐτὸν παραλυτικὸν following ἔρχονται here).
- participial phrases that precede the main clause (e.g., εἰσελθὼν πάλιν εἰς Καφαρναοὺμ in 2:1) virtually always communicate backgrounded information.
What 2 types of information typically make up background information?
(1) nonevents, and
2) secondary events (that is, events that are not on the mainline
How are nonevents typically expressed?
with a verb of being (e.g., εἰμί) or some other verb that conveys a state (e.g., πεινάω, “to be hungry”).
What 5 ways can nonevents be further subdivided?
(1) participant orientation (introduces participants; “Once upon a time, there was a wizard”),
(2) setting (tells about the time, place, or circumstances of the main events; “The days in which he lived were not bad, though troubles were on the horizon”),
(3) explanation/comment (tells why something is happening or provides further contextual detail;
“because he was old”),
(4) evaluation (tells how the author or a character regards main events; “as far as wizards go, he was not very impressive!”)
(5) discourse irrealis (tells what could have happened but did not as context for saying what did, in fact, happen—such a clause describes a nonevent because it never took place; “He considered writing a book or two but chose not to”).
What are secondary events? And why are they background?
Secondary events are encoded with action verbs, and thus they are truly events, but they are secondary events because they are not part of the mainline.
What is one of the most common ways that Greek expresses a secondary event?
by an adverbial participial phrase that precedes its corresponding main clause (more technically, we could say that the participial phrase is prenuclear).
What is background and foreground in Mark 2:4, καὶ μὴ δυνάμενοι προσενέγκαι αὐτῷ διὰ τὸν ὄχλον ἀπεστέγασαν τὴν στέγην ὅπου ἦν.
- Nonevent encoding background information: μὴ δυνάμενοι προσενέγκαι αὐτῷ διὰ τὸν ὄχλον (Notice that this phrase is a prenuclear adverbial participial phrase, which signals that it is backgrounded with respect to the following main clause. This participial phrase can be subclassified as discourse irrealis since it tells us what did not happen (going through the crowd) as background for what did happen (unroofing the roof). Since this participial phrase most likely has a causal relationship to the following main clause, we could also subclassify it as a nonevent of explanation, explaining why the man’s friends went to the extraordinary lengths of removing a roof—they were not able to get through the crowd. Either way, the participial phrase describes a nonevent and thus is background information.)
- foreground: ἀπεστέγασαν τὴν στέγην ὅπου ἦν
What is markedness?
the study of linguistic markers (e.g. the aorist is marked for past tense and perfective aspect)