Unit 2 Flashcards
Human resource
planning
Definition: the business process for ensuring that
an organisation has suitable access to potential
candidates to ensure future business success
Labour turnover
- The movement of employees in and out of a
business in a given time period as an indicator for
stability of a business
(number of staff leaving per year) / (average
number of staff employed per year) x 100
High labour turnover: unstable
Low labour turnover: unstable, but may lead to
lack of progress
HR plan: Must keep a healthy labour turnover
Internal factors
affecting HR
planning
- Business organisation
- Business finance
- Labour reaction
- Business strategy.
External factors
affecting HR
planning
- Technology
- Government regulation
- Education
- Demographic change
- Social trends
- Labour mobility
- Economy
Four steps of HR
plan
- Recruitment, training, appraisal, termination/
dismissal
Recruitment
Identification: business realises it needs a new
employee because of a change in internal factors
Application: business has to deduce how to find
the best applicant for the job
Selection process: The final part is selection of the
best applicant for the job
Training
- Induction: Training that focuses on making a new
employee familiar with the way the business
functions and the lines of authority - On the job: When employees are trained while
they are doing their job (mentoring/shadowing) - Off the job: When employee is given time off
work to attend training away from the job - Cognitive training: Helps develops the worker’s
thinking/processing skills - Behavioral training: Helps develop the worker’s
interpersonal and intrapersonal skills
Appraisal
- Formative: Give praise when employee has done
well - Summative: Measures an employees
performance according to standards - 360 degree: Employee receives appraisal from
co-workers/managers/customers/etc - Self appraisal: Use of self-appraisal forms which
may have performance indicators
Termination,
dismissal and
redundancy
- Termination: Employee terminates or leaves the
business at the end of their contract - Dismissal: When an employee breaks terms of
the contract and is dismissed as a result - Redundancy: When a business no longer has any
work for an employee (can be either voluntary/
involuntary)
Changes in work
pattern
- Types of job wanted by people constantly
change - In every country, there are different most sought
out jobs
Changes in work
practices
- Full time
- Part time work: Employee works less than the
full time weekly maximum hours - Temporary: Fixed term contract (i.e: maternity
leave) - Freelance: Self-employed working for several
different employers at the same time - Teleworking: Working from home or
telecommunication centre - Homeworking: Employee works from home
- Flexitime: Worker decides amount of hours
- Three-day weekend: Worker works more during
week so that he/she has a longer weekend
Changes in work
preferences
- Career breaks: Employee decides to stop
working for a time, but returns after some time
(sabbatical) - Job share: Two or more employees decide to
share a job in order to free up more time for
other activities - Downshifting: An employee gives up senior
position to work at a lower-paid position - Study leave: Employee is granted time off to
acquire a new qualification
Outsourcing,
offshoring and
resourcing
- Outsourcing/offshoring: May be used to cut
down HR costs - Reshoring: May be done to regain control/
personalise HR plan
Innovation, ethics
and culture on HR
strategies
Innovation: If company is innovative, it needs a
healthy HR plan in order to keep workers
motivated
Ethics: HR plan reflects how business treats its
employees
Culture: MNC’s must have diverse HR plan to suit
varied workforce
Delegation
- When a manager gives authority for a particular
decision, but not for the outcome
Span of control
- How many subordinates are directly under the
authority of a manager
Levels of hierarchy
- How many levels of responsibility are in a
business
Chain of command
- The formal route by which a decision must travel
through the organisation
Bureaucracy
- Any administrative system
Centralisation
- The degree of individuals involved in making
major decisions
De-centralisation
- Opposite of centralisation
De-layering
- Levels of hierarchy are reduced by removing
layers of management
Tall organisation
- Many levels of hierarchy
- Narrow span of control
- Centralised decision making
- Long chain of command
- Autocratic leadership
- Limited delegation
Flat organisation
- Few levels of hierarchy
- Wider span of control
- Decentralised decision making
- Shorter chain of command
- Democratic leadership
- Increased delegation
Organisational
charts
- Can be composed of: hierarchy, function,
product, region
Project based
organisation
- Designed to be flexible and responsive
- Teams in charge of specific tasks
- Only temporary
Shamrock
organisation
Shamrock organisation a market structure in which a business trims its workforce to retain only multi-skilled core, which is concerned with the creation of a product. All other supporting, non-central functions are outsourced to the periphery.
- Core: core activities/core workforce
- Subcontractors: In charge of additional services/
peripheral activities
- Flexible workforce: part time, temporary,
seasonal workers
Communication
- Verbal: interviews, meetings, lectures
- Visual: videos, signs, notice boards
- Written: reports, lectures, notices, bulletins
Communication and
innovation
Innovation enhances ways of communication
Communication and
culture
Culture affects choice of communication
Key functions of
management
- Planning: set strategic/operational objectives
- Organising: business must have sufficient
resources - Commanding: All individuals must know what to do
- Coordinating: Managers must bring together
resources to achieve objectives - Controlling
Managers
- Instruct and coordinate people
- Help subordinates resolve problems
- Technical
- Authority
- Make organisation function
Leaders
- Motivate/inspire
• Rely on instincts - Have vision
- Can lead company through change
Autocratic
leadership
Autocratic leadership is a leadership style in which the leader holds complete control over decision-making and authority within the organization. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership, as well as its limitations:
Advantages:
Clear direction: Autocratic leaders provide clear direction to their followers, which can be beneficial in situations where quick decision-making is necessary. The leader’s control over the decision-making process can help ensure that decisions are made efficiently and with clarity.
Quick decision-making: Because autocratic leaders have complete control over decision-making, they can make decisions quickly and without the need for lengthy discussions or input from others. This can be beneficial in situations where time is of the essence.
Efficient management: Autocratic leaders are able to manage their resources and employees more efficiently due to their control over the decision-making process.
Disadvantages:
Lack of collaboration: Autocratic leaders do not seek input or opinions from their followers, which can lead to a lack of collaboration and teamwork. This can result in lower employee morale and engagement, as well as a lack of trust in the leader.
Decreased creativity: Autocratic leaders are often more focused on maintaining control and may not encourage creativity or innovation among their followers. This can limit the organization’s ability to adapt to change or develop new ideas.
High turnover: Autocratic leaders may be seen as controlling or oppressive, which can lead to high turnover rates and difficulty in recruiting and retaining talented employees.
Limitations:
Situational effectiveness: Autocratic leadership may be effective in certain situations, such as in a crisis or in a highly structured environment. However, it may not be effective in situations where collaboration and creativity are important.
Cultural considerations: Autocratic leadership may be more acceptable in some cultures than in others. In cultures that value individualism and democracy, autocratic leadership may not be viewed positively.
Ethics considerations: Autocratic leadership can raise ethical concerns if the leader uses their power to exploit or manipulate their followers.
Paternalistic
leadership
Paternalistic leadership is a leadership style in which the leader takes on a parental role, providing guidance, support, and direction to their followers. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of paternalistic leadership, as well as its limitations:
Advantages:
Increased loyalty: Paternalistic leaders tend to create a sense of loyalty and commitment among their followers, as they are viewed as caring and supportive. This can lead to increased employee retention and satisfaction.
Positive work environment: Paternalistic leaders aim to create a positive work environment, promoting collaboration, trust, and respect. This can result in a more positive organizational culture, with higher employee morale and engagement.
Employee development: Paternalistic leaders often invest in the development of their employees, providing mentorship, training, and opportunities for growth. This can lead to increased employee skills and knowledge, as well as increased motivation and job satisfaction.
Disadvantages:
Limited autonomy: Paternalistic leaders tend to make decisions for their followers, which can limit autonomy and creativity. This can lead to a lack of innovation and adaptability, and may stifle employee growth and development.
Dependence on the leader: Paternalistic leaders may create a sense of dependence among their followers, which can limit their ability to work independently or think critically. This can result in a lack of initiative or ownership among employees.
Inflexibility: Paternalistic leaders may be resistant to change or new ideas, as they tend to value tradition and stability. This can limit the organization’s ability to adapt to changing circumstances or respond to new challenges.
Limitations:
Cultural considerations: Paternalistic leadership may be more acceptable in some cultures than in others. In cultures that value individualism and independence, paternalistic leadership may not be viewed positively.
Gender considerations: Paternalistic leadership is often associated with male leaders, which can create gender bias or stereotypes in the workplace.
Power imbalances: Paternalistic leadership can create power imbalances between the leader and their followers, which can lead to ethical concerns if the leader abuses their power or exploits their followers.
Democratic
leadership
Democratic leadership is a leadership style in which the leader seeks input and participation from their followers in the decision-making process. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of democratic leadership, as well as its limitations:
Advantages:
Increased participation and engagement: Democratic leaders involve their followers in the decision-making process, which can increase participation and engagement. This can result in higher levels of employee satisfaction and motivation.
Enhanced creativity and innovation: Democratic leaders encourage creativity and innovation among their followers, which can result in new ideas and approaches. This can lead to improved problem-solving and decision-making within the organization.
Improved communication and teamwork: Democratic leaders promote communication and collaboration among their followers, which can result in a more positive organizational culture and better teamwork.
Disadvantages:
Time-consuming: Democratic leadership can be time-consuming, as it involves gathering input and opinions from multiple sources. This can result in slower decision-making processes, which may not be ideal in certain situations.
Lack of clarity and direction: Democratic leaders may struggle to provide clear direction and guidance, as they rely on input from their followers. This can result in confusion or uncertainty among employees, and may limit the leader’s ability to make difficult decisions.
Difficulty in consensus-building: Democratic leadership relies on consensus-building and collaboration, which can be difficult to achieve in situations where there are differing opinions or conflicting goals.
Limitations:
Cultural considerations: Democratic leadership may be more acceptable in some cultures than in others. In cultures that value hierarchy or deference to authority, democratic leadership may not be viewed positively.
Power imbalances: Democratic leadership can create power imbalances if the leader is perceived as favoring certain followers or if certain individuals dominate the decision-making process.
Lack of expertise: Democratic leadership may not be effective in situations where the leader lacks expertise or knowledge in a particular area, as input from followers may not provide the necessary information or guidance.
Laissez-faire
leadership
Laissez-faire leadership is a leadership style in which the leader provides little guidance or direction to their followers, allowing them to make their own decisions and solve problems independently. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of laissez-faire leadership, as well as its limitations:
Advantages:
Increased autonomy: Laissez-faire leadership allows employees to have a greater degree of autonomy and control over their work, which can lead to increased motivation and job satisfaction.
Improved creativity and innovation: Laissez-faire leadership encourages employees to think independently and come up with their own ideas, which can result in improved creativity and innovation within the organization.
Flexibility: Laissez-faire leadership allows for greater flexibility in the workplace, as employees are able to make their own decisions and work on their own schedules.
Disadvantages:
Lack of guidance and support: Laissez-faire leadership can lead to a lack of guidance and support from the leader, which can result in confusion or uncertainty among employees. This can also limit their ability to develop their skills and knowledge.
Decreased productivity: Laissez-faire leadership may lead to decreased productivity, as employees may lack direction or support in achieving their goals. This can also result in a lack of accountability or responsibility among employees.
Potential for conflict: Laissez-faire leadership can lead to potential conflicts among employees, as they may have different ideas or approaches that are not aligned with each other or the organization’s goals.
Limitations:
Cultural considerations: Laissez-faire leadership may be more acceptable in some cultures than in others. In cultures that value hierarchy or structure, laissez-faire leadership may not be viewed positively.
Lack of control: Laissez-faire leadership may not be effective in situations where the leader needs to maintain control over the decision-making process or the outcomes.
Need for skilled employees: Laissez-faire leadership requires skilled and motivated employees who are able to work independently and make decisions on their own. This can be a limitation if the organization does not have the necessary talent or resources
Situational
leadership
Situational leadership is a leadership style in which the leader adapts their approach to the needs and abilities of their followers, depending on the situation. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of situational leadership, as well as its limitations:
Advantages:
Flexibility: Situational leadership allows leaders to be flexible in their approach, adapting to the needs and abilities of their followers. This can result in more effective leadership and better outcomes for the organization.
Improved communication and collaboration: Situational leadership requires leaders to communicate effectively with their followers and involve them in the decision-making process. This can result in better teamwork and collaboration within the organization.
Increased motivation and satisfaction: Situational leadership can increase motivation and satisfaction among employees, as it allows them to have a greater degree of input and control over their work.
Disadvantages:
Time-consuming: Situational leadership can be time-consuming, as it requires leaders to assess the situation and determine the appropriate approach for each individual or group.
Complexity: Situational leadership can be complex, as it requires leaders to have a deep understanding of their followers’ needs and abilities, as well as the organizational goals and objectives.
Potential for inconsistency: Situational leadership can lead to inconsistency in leadership, as the approach may vary depending on the situation or the follower. This can result in confusion or uncertainty among employees.
Limitations:
Lack of clear guidance: Situational leadership may not provide clear guidance or direction to followers, as the approach may vary depending on the situation. This can result in confusion or uncertainty among employees.
Difficulty in implementation: Situational leadership can be difficult to implement effectively, as it requires leaders to have a deep understanding of their followers’ needs and abilities. It can also be difficult to assess the situation accurately and determine the appropriate approach.
Need for training and development: Situational leadership requires leaders to have strong communication and interpersonal skills, as well as the ability to adapt to different situations. This may require additional training or development for some leaders
Ethics and
leadership styles
- Leaders should always act ethically
Culture and
leadership styles
- Culture affects choice of leadership
Cultural values and beliefs can shape leadership style: Cultural values, beliefs, and practices can influence how leaders are viewed and what traits are seen as desirable in a leader. For example, cultures that emphasize collectivism may prefer leaders who are inclusive and collaborative, while cultures that value individualism may prefer leaders who are more independent and assertive.
Communication style can vary across cultures: Communication style can vary significantly across cultures, and this can impact how leaders interact with their followers. Leaders may need to adjust their communication style to fit the cultural expectations of their followers, particularly when working with diverse teams or operating in cross-cultural environments.
Attitudes towards authority can differ: Different cultures may have different attitudes towards authority, which can impact how leaders are viewed and how they should behave. In some cultures, leaders are expected to be decisive and assertive, while in others, leaders may be expected to be more democratic and participatory.
Cultural norms can shape leadership behavior: Cultural norms and practices can influence how leaders behave and what actions are considered appropriate. For example, in some cultures, leaders are expected to show humility and deference, while in others, leaders may be expected to display confidence and assertiveness.
Contextual factors can also influence leadership style: Cultural factors are not the only determinants of leadership style, and other contextual factors such as organizational structure, industry norms, and societal expectations may also play a role