Unit 1.7 : Organizational Planning Tools (HL) Flashcards
Fishbone Diagram
- A graphical representation of the most likely causes and effects of an important decision
- Qualitative organizational planning tool that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or issue
- It is also known as the cause and effect diagram
- Usually the 4Ps are used as the bones - paraphernalia, policies, procedures, and people
- Managers can identify the various aspects of the problem which must undoubtedly be addressed, such as adequate training or updating office equipment
Organizational planning tools
- Tools that enable businesses to deal with their problems, issues, or concerns in a systematic way
- All business, regardless of legal status and size, have to plan in order to achieve their organizational objectives
Causes that can be found on the fishbone diagram
- Management (unsuitable management style or miscommunication)
- Manpower (unskilled labour or lack of training)
- Machinery (technological failures or outdates machinery)
- Materials (sub-standard - poor quality materials and delayed deliveries)
Important factors to a successful fish bone diagram`
- The problem os issue must be clearly stated and agreed upon before any discussions start
- Contributors must be concise and to the point
- For each bone, brainstorm the possible cause and place these onto the nodes
- Consider combining nodes that are empty
- Consider separating overcrowded nodes
Pros of the fishbone diagram
- It is easy to use and understand
- Allows decision makers to brainstorm ideas in a systematic, holistic, and logical way
- Facilitates a visual diagnosis of a problem or issue
- The fishbone diagram has led to computer programmes such as SmartDraw, which aid in decision-making
Cons of the fishbone diagram
- The fishbone diagram model tends to be rather simplistic for some real-world problems
- It is usually used in conjunction with other decision-making frameworks to establish the root cause of problems
- It’s often based on opinion rather than evidence; it needs testing to prove results
- May bring irrelevant potential causes can cause confusion
Decision Trees
- A decision tree is a quantitative decision-making tool that calculated the probable values of different options, helping managers to minimise the risks in decision-making
- It is a diagrammatic representation of the different options that are available to a business in the decision-making process, showing their probable outcomes
- The tool allows managers to calculate the expected value of each decision in order to plan the best option to follow
Rules to construct and interpret decision trees
- The diagram is constructed from left to right
- Decision nodes are SQUARES (when there is a decision to be made)
- Chance nodes are in CIRCLES (used to show the different possible outcomes of a decision
- Each chance node should have two or more routes or outcomes. These show the probability of the different outcomes for each chance node
- The actual values of each outcome are stated at the end of each branch
- Each branch is cut-off indicated by two parallel lines
Pros of decision trees
- They allow managers to set out problems in a clear and logical manner
- All potential options can be seen at the same time, thereby speeding up decision-making
- They consider the risks involved in decision-making such as possible negative outcomes
- They enable more scientific and objective decisions to be made as all likely costs of decisions are considered
- As a visual stimulus, they provide a tangible insight to a problem, rather than having to rely on people’s view or emotions of the problem
Cons of decision trees
- The probabilities given in a decision tree are only estimates and are subject to forecasting errors
- They are based on quantitative data only, so qualitative issues (such as the effects on staff morale or the compatibility of a decision with the firm’s aims) are ignored
- The technique does not necessarily reduce the amount of risk involved in decision-making
- Delays in the planning process can void the data by the time a decision is actually made, yet jet lags are often inevitable in the real business world
- The task of assigning probabilities is rather subjective so results can be deliberately biased to justify the preference of the management
Force field analysis
- Force field analysis (FFA) deals with the forces for and against change
- Businesses need to be constantly adapting and changing, rather than being fixed in outdated practices and unable to look forward - force field analysis helps to decide whether change should be made
- Driving forces push for change whilst restraining forces act against change
- The relative strength of these forces determine whether the change should take place
- FFA can help to improve a project’s chances of success by investigating how driving forces can be strengthened and how restraining forces can be minimised or eliminated
- It is essentially a specialised technique of weighing up advantages and disadvantages to help decide whether a proposed change is worth implementing
Stages involved in the force field analysis
- List the driving forces for change and the restraining forces against change
- Allocate a weight to each of these forces - from 1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
- Draw a FFA diagram, including the weights of each of the driving and restraining forces
- Total the scores for the driving forces and restraining forces
Pros of force field analysis
- Provides a visual summary of all the various factors supporting and opposing a particular idea, with all the data that has been collected regarding a potential decision consolidated into a single graph
- Helps to improve a project’s chances of success by investigating how driving forces can be strengthened and how restraining forces can be minimised or eliminated
- Can look at qualitative factors
Cons of force field analysis
- Weights attached to the driving and restraining forces might be done subjectively rather than based on facts or evidence
- Not all relevant forces might be considered, perhaps deliberately to overemphasise the need for change
Gantt charts
- A gantt chart is a visual representation of all the tasks in a particular project plotted against the timescale
- It is a management tool used to plan and schedule business projects, allowing project managers to monitor progress
- Project management allows managers to complete a project successfully in the quickest time available by overseeing a large number of activities and ensuring that each task is completed on schedule
- Ultimate purpose of making a Gantt chart is to identify the minimum amount of time needed to complete a project. This requires the various tasks of a project to be planned in a logical order so that the different processes are completed with minimal delay and maximum efficiency
Rules to construct and interpret Gantt charts
- It is presented as a bar chart showing all the schedules tasks over a given time scale
- The time scale is shown on the horizontal axis
- Each activity is shown by a separate horizontal rectangular bar, with the length depicting the duration of the activity. Each bar shows the start date, duration, and end date of an activity
- Each horizontal bar show the start and finish date
- Both critical and non-critical activities (those with some slack time) are shown
- Predecessor-successor relationships are shown such as activities that must be preceded by others
Steps in making a gantt chart
- Identify all the activities required for the completion of the project
- Break down the project into separate and clearly identifiable tasks
- Determine how long each of the tasks will take
- Identify all dependencies (activities that cannot start until the completion of other tasks)
- Determine which tasks can take place concurrently to minimise production time
- Place all tasks in the right sequence on the gantt chart
Pros of gantt charts
- It improves efficiency and helps to manage resources (reduces time spent doing nothing)
- Allows for better tracking of the project status
- Illustrates overlaps and dependencies
- Visual so easy to see
- Can allow you to balance multiple projects
- Helps to set realistic deadlines and expectations
- Helps to keep everyone aligned, including remote or telecommuting workers
Cons of gantt charts
- Don’t designate priorities (assume everything is of the same priority)
- They can become complex and confusing for large projects with many things happening simultaneously
- Task bars do not show the amount of work that each task requires
- Setting it up can be time-consuming
Three levels of business decision-making
- Operational decisions
- Tactical decisions
- Strategic decisions
Operational decisions
- Routine and day-to-day decision
- e.g. supervisors deciding when factory floor workers should go for their break or sales managers dealing with customer enquiries
Tactical decisions
- Regular and short-term decisions
- Usually made by middle management
- e.g. decisions about pricing strategies or recruitment
Strategic decisions
- High-level and long-term decisions that set the overall direction for a business
- Such decisions are dealt with by senior managers as they carry much more risk
- e.g. which products to develop, salaries, which markets to enter, expansion etc
Types of organizational planning tools
- Fishbone diagram
- Gantt chart
- Forcefield analysis
- Decision trees