Unit 10: Quasi Experimentation Flashcards

1
Q

quasi experiments

A

The researcher selects participants from pre-existing groups (does not have control over assigning subjects to conditions).
Sometimes called ex post facto because assignment happens after the groups have formed (ex. male/female)
Difference between groups may not be the cause of the effect, could be obscuring the effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

non-equivalent control group designs

A

Experiment with a control and experimental group, but P are nor randomly assigned to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

repeated treatment designs

A

A design that attempts to improve validity by introducing the treatment more than once (return to baseline in between).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

interrupted time-series designs

A

A design that considers the trend before and after the experiment, so one group can be tested alone (no control)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

program evaluation

A

A set of techniques for determining the effectiveness of a social service program.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

summative evaluation

A

A way to determine whether a program is functioning adequately, meeting its goals.
Often after completion.
Can be used to determine cutbacks, changes, expanding, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

formative evaluation

A

The goal is to improve the program.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cross-sectional study

A

A design that tests different age groups at the same time to determine age-based differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

longitudinal study

A

A design that follows one P/group and tests them at different points over time to determine age-based differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

cross-sequential design

A

Tests 2+ groups at 2+ times to control for cohort effects, secular effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cohort effect

A

Effects of characteristics that are specific to a cohort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

secular effect

A

Effects due to changes in the larger population/social environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How are quasi experiments different from true experiments?

A

Still intend to show cause-effect, but one of these is not met:

  1. researcher randomly assigns P to 2 groups that are roughly equivalent
  2. researcher manipulates the IV
  3. there is a control or baseline condition to compare to experimental/treatment condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under what circumstances can quasi experiments be a useful tool?

A
  • when only option/better than nothing
  • when can’t practically or ethically assign P to groups for exposure to the IV
  • can test lab results for external validity
  • can suggest further research for lab
  • can have higher external validity than true if more closely resembles the real world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the major weakness of quasi experiments?

A

Confounding variables. Because the researcher doesn’t have complete control over assigning P to conditions. Difference between groups could be the cause of effect, or could be obscuring the real cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Major threats in field testing (need to the diligent about these in quasi-experiments)

A
  1. diffusion/imitation of treatment - groups share info/resources with each other - reduces difference
  2. compensatory equalization - workers give treatment to control P - reduces differences
  3. compensatory rivalry - disadvantaged group is motivated to perform better - reduces difference
  4. resentful demoralization - disadvantaged group is discouraged and performs worse - increases difference
17
Q

What is a non-equivalent control group design with pretest and post-test? Under what circumstances are the results of quasi-experiments that use this design interpretable?

A

Control and experimental groups are not roughly equal - they differ in some way.
Add in a pre-test and post-test and then compare results.
The results are interpretable if they can be attributed to the difference between groups.
Pre-test scores start similar, then experimental change but control not, OR experimental starts lower and ends up higher.

18
Q

Under what circumstances is an interrupted time-series design useful?

A

When no control group is possible.

When data for before and after can be accessed to show trends.

19
Q

What different strategies are used in non-equivalent control group designs and interrupted time-series designs to control for confounding variables?

A
  1. comparing pre- and post-test results with other groups

2. considering trends before and after the test

20
Q

What are repeated-treatment designs? How do these designs control for confounding variables?

A

The treatment is introduced multiple times, with a return to baseline between each. If the effect is consistent each time, it increases confidence that the IV is causing the effect in the DV. Proves the effect isn’t due to a trend.

21
Q

Which quasi-experimental designs can be used with a single subject (an individual, a company, or some other units)?

A
  • interrupted time series
  • repeated treatments
  • longitudinal
22
Q

What are the common quasi-experimental designs used in developmental psychology?

A
  • longitudinal
  • cross-sectional
  • cross-sequential
23
Q

advantages and disadvantages of Cross-sectional study

A

A: faster/cheaper, done by one researcher
D: hard to control for cohort effects, age is confounded with DOB.

24
Q

advantages and disadvantages of Longitudinal study

A

A: avoids cohort effects
D: takes longer, more expensive, more than one researcher, confounds age with time of testing (secular effects)

25
Q

advantages and disadvantages of Cross-sequential design

A

A: addresses the confounding in cross-sectional and longitudinal. Shows secular effects, though does not control for them.

26
Q

How can quasi-experimental designs be used in evaluations of social programmes?

A

They are useful because P are often assigned (not randomly) to groups. Comparing existing groups according to an IV requires a quasi-experimental design.