UNIT 1 Flashcards
What is Language?
- What constitutes “Language”
- How de we talk about it?
- How do we measure it?
- What are its parts?
- How do we Assess it?
- How do we teach it?
- There are many different theories of language
Theories of Language
- Chap 1 of VB Skinner presents various linguistic theories
- Linguistic theory can be classified into 2 general often overlapping views:
1) Biological, 2) Cognitive, 3) Environmental
1) Biological view: C&P argue that language is innate to humans & primarily result of Physiological processes & Functions & that language has little to do with environmental variables, such as reinforcement & stimulus control
- Brain -> words, phrases, sentences
- Nature vs nurture
Theories of Language
COGNITIVE
- Psychologists argue that language is controlled by Internal Cognitive processing systems tht Accept, Classify, Code, Encode & store Verbal info & Language has less todo with env variables such as reinforcement & Stimulus Control.
- Language is viewed as Receptive & Expressive & the 2 are referred to as Communicative Bx that is controlled by cognitive processors
- Cognition -> Words
- Cognitive & receptive-expressive framework Dominates current lang assessment & intervention prog for children with autism
How Language Measured in a Traditional Linguistic Analysis?
- The focus is on response forms, topography and structure
- Phonemes
- Morphemes
- Lexicon
- Syntax
- Grammer
- Semantics
- Mean of length of utterances (MLU): words, phrases, sentences
- Classification system: nouns, verbs, adj, adverbs etc
Skinner wrote the book verbal Bx due, in part, to a challenge by:
a) Noam Chomsky
b) Roger Brown
c) Alfred North Whitehead
d) Jean Piaget
c) Alfred North Whitehead
Skinner’s book Verbal Bx contained:
a) Empirical research on verbal Bx
b) An analysis of autism & language delays
c) A rebuttal to Noam Chomsky
d) A conceptual analysis of language
d) A conceptual analysis of language
The response form consists of:
1) Mands, tacts, phonemes & words emitted
2) Phenomes, morphemes, words and sentences emitted
3) Mands, tacts, intraverbal and echoic emitted
4) Grammer, autoclitics, syntax and semantics emitted
2) Phenomes, morphemes, words and sentences emitted
Skinner’s (1975) Book Verbal BX (Chap 1 of VB is titled “A Functional Analysis of Verbal Bx)
- Etymological sanctions & terminology in VB
- Language is Learned Bx under the functional control of env contingencies
- “What happens wen a man speaks/responds to speech is clearly a ques about human Bx & hence a ques to be ans with the concepts & techniques of psychology as an experimental science of Bx)
Skinner’s (1975) Book Verbal Behavior
“Bx reinforced through the mediation of other persons” (who are trained to do so)
- The speaker & the listener (total verbal episode) The speaker & listener can be the Same skin
- Our 1st responsibility is simple Description: wat is topography of this subdivision of human bx? 1ce tht ques has been ans in atleast a preliminary fashion we may advance to the stage called Explanation: wat conditions are relevant to the occurrences of Bx- wat are the variables of which it is a function?
Skinner’s (1957) Book Verbal Behavior
- The analysis of VB involves the same Behavioral principles 7 concepts that make up the analysis of nonverbal Bx. No new principles of Bx are required. There are some new terms
- In chap 2 of VB Skinner presents the independent & dependent variables of VB
The function of a verbal response consists of:
a) The relevant cognitive processes involved
b) The genetic predisposition to communicate
c) Environmental antecedents & consequences
d) A blend of cognitive & environmental variables
c) Environmental antecedents & consequences
Skinner’s (1957) Book Verbal Behavior
- “Technically, meanings are to be found among the independent variables in a Functional account rather than as properties of the dependent variable”
- What constitutes a “Unit” of Verbal BX
- “….a response of identifiable form functionally related to one or more independent variables
- Wat is the Unit of analysis in language?
Skinner’s (1957) Book Verbal Behavior
- A common misconception about Skinner’s analysis of Verbal Bx is that the he Rejects the traditional classification of language
- However, it is not traditional classification/description of the response he finds fault with, it is the Failure to account for the causes/function of the verbs, nouns sentences etc
- The analysis of How and Why one says words is typically relegated to the field of psychology combined with linguistics: hence the field of “Psycholinguistics”
- Skinner noted that “A service of bx does not arrive at this special field to find it Unoccupied
How is Language Measured in a Behavioral Analysis?
-The Verbal Operant in the UNIT of analysis e.g. Mands, Tacts & Intraverbals
MO/Sd -> Response -> Consequence
Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal Behavior
- The traditional linguistic classification of words, sentences and Phrases as expressive & receptive language Blends imp functional distinctions among types of operant Bx & appeals to cognitive Explanations for the causes of language Bx
- in chap 3-5 of Verbal Bx Skinner presents the “elementary verbal operants’
Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal BX
- All the core of Skinner’s analysis of verbal bx is the distinction btw the Mand, Tact & intraverbal (traditionally all classified as “Expressive Language”
- Skinner identified 3 separate sources of Antecedent control for these Verbal Operants
- EO/MO control -> Mand
- Non verbal Sd -> Tact
- Verbal Sd -> Intraverbal
The Behavioral Classification of Language
- 4 of the verbal operants….
- Mand: Asking for reinforcers. Asking for “Mommy” cuz you want mommy
- TACT: Naming or identifying objects, actions, events etc. Saying “Mommy” because you see Mommy
- Echoic: Repeating what is heard. Saying “Mommy” after someone else says “Mommy”
- Intraverbal: Answering ques or having conversations where your words are controlled by other words. Saying “Mommy” someone else says “Daddy and…”
A question is usually an e.g. of which type of verbal behavior?
a) Intraverbal
b) Mand
c) Tact
d) Intraverbal and mand
b) Mand
The Role of the Listener: The Problem with Traditional views
- The traditional conception of VB…..has generally implied that certain basic linguistic processes were common to Both speaker & listener
- Theories of Meaning are usually applied to both speaker & listener as if the meaning process were the same for both
- Reason Skinner avoided use of the common terms Expressive Language & Receptive language cuz of the implication that they are merely different Manifestation of the same underlying cognitive processes
- And that the Listener’s Bx also constituted “Language”
The Role of the Listener: The Problem with Traditional Views
- Linguists & psycholinguists are primarily concerned with the Bx of the listener with what words mean to those who hear them & with what kind of sentences are judged grammatical or ungrammatical
- The very concept of communication whether if ideas, meanings or information - emphasized Transmission to a listener
- Much of the Bx of the listener has no Resemblance to the Bx of the Speaker & is Not Verbal according to our definition
The Role of the Listener: The Term “Listener”
- Etymological Sanction & the term “Listener”
- Skinner’s use of Listener is not the same as the accepted lay use of the term
- It is also not the same as Linguist’s use of the term
- The deaf & sign language
The Role of the Listener
What role does listener play in Skinner’s account of language
- A common position is that Skinner totally Ignores the Listener
- The word “Listener” appears on at-least 50% of the pages in VB
- There are 14 section headings (6 major) containing the word “listener”
- 2 full chapters are mostly devoted to the listener
- “Skinner’s” analysis of VB very convincingly directs our Attention to the complexity of the listener’s repertoire to account for speaker’s BX
The Different Roles of the Listener
1) Necessary for a verbal Episode
‘The Bx of the Speaker & Listener taken together compose what maybe called the total verbal episode
- “There is nothing in such an episode which is more than the combined Bx of two or more individuals”
- It would be foolish to underestimate the difficulty of this subject matter”
The Different Roles of the Listener
2) The Listener Consequates the speaker’s Bx
- Mediates Rx
- “The Verbal community maintains the Bx of the speaker with generalized Rx
The Different Roles of the Listener
3) The Listener Functions as an Sd and MO for Verbal Bx
- The listener, as an essential part of the situation in which VB is observed is a Discriminative stimulus
- “This function is to distinguished from the action of the listener in reinforcing Bx”
The Different Roles of the Listener
4) The listener “takes additional action”
“VB would be pointless if a listener did nothing more than reinforce the speaker for “The action which a listener takes with respect to the verbal response is often more imp to the speaker than generalized Rx
The Different Roles of the Listener
1) Nonverbal respondent BX
2) Nonverbal Operant Bx
30 Verbal Bx
The Different Roles of the Listener
-1) NonVerbal Respondent Bx
- Among the special effects of verbal Bx are the emotional reactions of the listener
- If a verbal stimulus accompanies some state of affairs which is the unconditioned or previously conditioned stimulus for an emotional reaction the verbal stimulus eventually evokes this reaction
The Different Roles of the Listener
Nonverbal Operant Bx (Receptive Language)
- Listener Compliances
- Listener Discrimination
- Listener Responding by function, feature and class
- These e.g. remind us of the fact that the Bx of listener is essentially Verbal. The listener reacts to a verbal stimulus whether with conditioned reflexes or discriminated operant Bc as he reacts to any feature of the Env
The Different Roles of the Listener
Verbal Operant Behavior (usually, the main argument)
- “In many imp instances the listener is also Behaving at the same time as a Speaker”
- “An imp fact about Verbal Bx is that the speaker & Listener may reside within the same Skin”
- “Some of the Bx of Listening resembles the Bx of speaking, particularly when the speaker “Understands” what is said”
- Much of what is Traditionally called “Listening” is Covert verbal Bx, consisting of all the Verbal Operants
The Different Roles of the Listener:
Summary
- Skinner’s Restricted use of “Listener”
- Necessary for a verbal episode (even when the speaker is his own listener)
- Discriminative stimulus & MO for VB (audience)
- Mediator of RX for the speaker (consequence)
- Nonverbal “action” (respondent Bx (emotion), Operant Bx (Receptive language))
- When Skinner says ‘very little of the Bx of the listener is Worth distinguishing as Verbal”
The Different Roles of the Listener: Summary (contd…)
- Excluded from Skinner’s use of Listener
- Verbal BX (“Listener” becomes a covert speaker)
- As a covert speaker all the Verbal Operants are Possible
- When Skinner says “Linguists & Psycholinguists are primarily concerned with the Bx of the Listener”
The Different Roles of the Listener: Summary
Contd…
- Excluded from Skinner’s use of “Listener”
- VB (“listener” becomes a covert speaker)
- As a Covert speaker all the verbal operants are Possible
- When Skinner says “Linguists & Psycholinguists are primarily concerned with the BX of the listener”, it’s tis covert VB that they are interested in
The Role of the Listener: Wat’s Missing?
- Wat aspects of the listener are Missing from Verbal BX?
- Skinner conceded in his 1989 paper “The BX of the Listener” that indeed the book VB contained “Little direct discussion of Listening”
- A detailed analysis of wat is traditionally called “Receptive language” is missing
The Role of the Listener: What’s Missing?
- There is not a Systematic analysis of Verbal stimulus control over nonverbal Operant Bx
- Similar to the type of analysis found for Mand, Tact, Intraverbal etc & their controlling variables
- More specifically, an Analysis of Verbal conditional discriminative stimuli (CSdS) that evoke nonverbal Bxs is missing
- Skinner did talk about the “Compound verbal stimulus” in relation to the intraverbal
- Catania identified the importance of verbal conditional discriminations to all of Verbal Bx
Skinner did not like the common distinction btw “Expressive” and “receptive” language because:
a) There was very little data to support the Distinction
b) The implication that they are merely different manifestation of the same underlying cognitive process
c) It had no clear application to language assessment and intervention
d) They are behaviorally the same skills
b) The implication that they are merely different manifestation of the same underlying cognitive process
The term receptive language only includes one aspect of what Skinner calls listener Bx. The term receptive language neglects the role of the listener as:
a) A speaker
b) An audience, a person who consequates VB, & one who takes respondent & verbal action
c) As an SD, MO & mediator for Verbal Behaviors
d) As a communicative partner
b) An audience, a person who consequates VB, & one who takes respondent & verbal action
Many claimed Skinner ignored the listener in his book Verbal BX. However, what he actually did was:
a) Suggest that all listener Bx was actually speaker Bx
b) Agree with the traditional definition of the listener & refer the readers to the relevant sources
c) Suggest that indeed the listener was irrelevant to language
d) Redefine the role of the listener as comprised of several different repertoires
d) Redefine the role of the listener as comprised of several different repertoires
Skinner describes a “verbal episode” as:
a) An intraverbal chain of Verbal Bx
b) All expressive language
c) An interaction btw a speaker and a listener
d) Only listener Bx
c) An interaction btw a speaker and a listener
A listener consequates a speaker’s Bx by:
a) Mediating RX
b) Correcting Verbal errors
c) Politely waiting for a turn to be a speaker
d) Taking accurate data
a) Mediating RX
A listener functions as a SD or an MO for verbal Bx by:
a) Reinforcing appropriate VB
b) Mediating Reinforcement
c) Echoically prompting correct responses
d) Serving as an audience that evokes verbal BX
d) Serving as an audience that evokes verbal BX
Skinner states that the most interesting elements of listener Bx are that the listener takes action. Wat kind of action does a listener take?
a) Emits respondent Bx
b) Emits verbal & nonverbal Bx as well as respondent Bx
c) Mediates Rx
d) Serves as an audience for verbal Bx
b) Emits verbal & nonverbal Bx as well as respondent Bx
Most who argue wit Skinner’s treatment of the listener fail to understand his point that:
a) The listener is an audience & mediator of speaker Bx
b) Much of wat is traditionally called listener Bx is actually covert verbal Bx
c) Cognitive psychology assigns causality to the wrong variables
d) The listener only mediates Rx
b) Much of wat is traditionally called listener Bx is actually covert verbal Bx
When Skinner says “very little of the Bx of the listener is worth distinguishing as verbal”, he is referring to which component(s) of listener Bx?
a) Mediating Verbal Bx
b) Serving as an audience for Bx
c) Mediating VB, serving as an audience for verbal Bx & emitting respondent & nonverbal action
d) All the BX of the listener
c) Mediating VB, serving as an audience for verbal Bx & emitting respondent & nonverbal action
Skinner admits (1989) that e did omit the treatment of a major aspect of listener Bx in his book VB. He neglected a detailed treatment of:
a) What is identified as receptive language, or the nonverbal Bx emitted by a listener
b) The cognitive processing of words demonstrated by a listener
c) How the listener becomes a covert speaker
d) Why the listener & speaker are different in behavioral terms
a) What is identified as receptive language, or the nonverbal Bx emitted by a listener
The Role of the Listener:
Verbal Conditioned Discriminations
-Verbal CSd: Two components of a verbal antecedent where one verbal stimulus Alters the evocative effect of the second verbal stimulus and collectively they evoke a differential response
For E.g. Touch a food…, Touch a Hot Food…, Touch a breakfast food
-Children with autism often have a difficult time acquiring Bx Controlled by verbal CSds, especially as the components grow beyond 2
-(Verbal CSd are also the main sources of control for most intraverbal Bx)
The Role of the Listener: Research & Applications
- VB CSds comprise a Significant component of the antecedent variables for listener Bx & constitute an excellent & Needed area of Research
- For e.g.
- Listener discriminations
- Listener Responding by Functions, Feature and Class
- Autoclitic relations
- Rule governed Bx
- However at the current time there is very little behavioral research on multiple component Verbal conditional discrimination
A conditional discrimination in “receptive language” would involve:
a) A verbal stimulus and a verbal response
b) A nonverbal stimulus & a nonverbal response
c) A verbal stimulus and a nonverbal response
d) A MO & a verbal response
c) A verbal stimulus and a nonverbal response
Verbal Extensions
- Generalization
- “If a response is reinforced upon a given occasion or class of occasions, any Feature of that occasion or common to that class appears to Gain some measure of Control
- A novel stimulus possessing one such feature may evoke a response
- There are several ways in which a Novel stimulus may resemble a stimulus previously present when a response was reinforced & hence there are several types of what we may call “extended tacts”
Verbal Extensions
Contd…….
- Skinner distinguished btw 4 types of extended tacts Generic, Metaphoric. Metonymic and Solistic
- The distinction is based on the degree to which a novel stimulus shares the relevant or irrelevant Features of the original stimulus
- In Generic Extension the Novel stimulus shares All of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
- In Metaphorical Extension the novel stimulus shares some, but not all of the relevant features of the Original stimulus
- In Metonymical extension the responses to novel stimuli have None of the relevant features of the original stimulus configuration, but some irrelevant but related feature has acquired stimulus Control
Verbal Extension (Contd….)
- Finally, a Solistic Extension occurs when
- “The property which gains control of the response is only Distantly related to the defining properties upon which standard reinforcements are contingent or is similar to that property for irrelevant reasons…..Most verbal communities not only Fail to respond effectively to such extension but provide some sort of Punishment for them”
Multiple Control
- Part 1 & 2 of book VB provides the reader with the defining features of elementary Verbal Operants & many e.g. of these operants
- Part 3, 4 & 5 focus on how to use these operants to Analyze complex VB
- Any given sample of VB esp those involving Verbal exchanges btw speakers & listeners contains a multitude of functional Relations btw antecedents, Bx & consequences
- The functional units of Echoics, Mands, Tacts, Intraverbal & Textual relations from the Formalities of VB analysis
Multiple Control
Contd…
- 2 facts emerge from our survey of the basic functional relations
1) Strength of a single Response maybe & usually is, a function of more than 1 variable &
2) A single Variable usually affects more than 1 response - Micheal identifies conditions where the strength of a single Verbal response is a function of more than 1 variable as “Convergent multiple control”
- Convergent multiple control can be observed in almost all instances of VB
- MO nonverbal stimuli & verbal stimuli freq share Antecedent control over VB
Multiple Control
Second Type
- The 2nd type of multiple control identified by Skinner occurs when a single antecedent variable affects the strength of more than just one response
- “Just as a given stimulus word will evoke a large # of different responses from a sample of the population at large, it increases the probability of emission of many responses in a single speaker
- Micheal identifies this type of control “Divergent Multiple Control”
Applications of Multiple Control
- Much of Early VB is multiply controles
- Mand-tact
- Multiple control can help to Evoke target Bx in language training procedures
- Mand + Tact + Echoic
- Most ongoing VB is multiply controlled
- Intraverbal & tact freq combine
Applications of Multiple Control
Contd
- Many eg of multiple control can be found in entertainment, literature, poetry, novels etc
- Michael points out that “The effects of multiple variables on the Bx of a listener play a role in our Enjoyment of esthetic and humorous aspects of VB
Skinner’s concept of “Verbal Extensions” are types of:
a) Generalization
b) Discrimination
c) Equivalence
d) Conditional discriminations
a) Generalization
In generic extension, the novel stimulus shares:
a) None of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
b) All of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
c) An irrelevant feature of the original stimulus
d) Some of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
b) All of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
In metaphoric extension, the novel stimulus shares:
a) An irrelevant features of the original stimulus
b) All of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
c) None of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
d) Some of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
d) Some of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
In metynomic extension, the novel stimulus shares:
a) None of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
b) Some of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
c) An irrelevant feature of the original stimulus
d) All of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
c) An irrelevant feature of the original stimulus
In Solistic extension, the novel stimulus shares:
a) An irrelevant features of the original stimulus
b) None of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
c) Some of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
d) All of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
b) None of the relevant or defining features of the original stimulus
In Skinner’s analysis of multiple control ________
a) A single response maybe a function of more than one variable
b) Two individuals can control the same Bx
c) A person may demonstrate multiple personalities
d) A mand, tact and intraverbal are all functionally equivalent
a) A single response maybe a function of more than one variable
Micheal defines convergent multiple control as:
a) The strength of a single response is a function of more than one variable
b) A single antecedent variable affects the strength of more than just one response
c) MO control combines with SD control
d) What makes literature interesting
a) The strength of a single response is a function of more than one variable
Michael defines divergent multiple control as:
a) MO control combined with SD control
b) The strength of a single response is a function of more than one variable
c) When a single antecedent variable affects the strength of more than just one response
d) Speaker and listener Bx combined
c) When a single antecedent variable affects the strength of more than just one response
Michael (2003) points out that the effects of multiple variables on the Bx of the listener ________
a) Cannot be easily identified
b) Play a role in our enjoyment of esthetic & humorous aspects of VB
c) Separate it from the BX of the speaker
d) Demonstrate the distinction btw the different types of Motivating Operations
b) Play a role in our enjoyment of esthetic & humorous aspects of VB
Private Events
- A significant amount of our day to day VB is controlled in part by private stimulation
- E.g. What is commonly referred to as “Thinking” involves stimuli arising from within an organism, the analysis of this type of stimulation & how it acquires stimulus control is Complex
- Skinner identifies 2 prob that are related to the analysis of VB controlled by private stimuli. First, “ the investigator cannot readily Point to the Stimuli to which he must appeal in predicting & controlling BX”
- 2nd “The problem of privacy cannot be fully solved by Instrumental invasion of the organism. No matter how clearly these internal events maybe exposed in the Lab, the fact remains that in the normal verbal episode they are quite Pvt”
Skinner’s Analysis of Private Events and his Radical Behaviorism
1, 2, 3
- B.F. Skinner’s philosophical view Radical Behaviorism, concerns the treatment of private stimuli.
1) BX is a function of the Env - any event in the universe capable of affecting the organism
2) But part of the universe is enclosed within the organism’s own skin
3) Some Stimuli or MOs may, therefore, be related to BX in a unique way. The individual’s response to an inflamed tooth.
Skinner’s Analysis of Private Events & his Radical Behaviorism
4)
4) But we need not suppose tht Private events have Special properties for that reason. They maybe distinguished by their limited accessibility but not, so far as we know, by any special structure/nature. Interoceptive & proprioceptive stimuli are just stimuli, like exteroceptive stimuli. The only Difference is that exteroceptive stimuli can affect more than 1 person in approx the same way
Skinner’s Analysis of Private Events & his Radical Behaviorism
5)
5) We acquire VB under control of Public stimuli by the reactions of others to our BX in the presence of those stimuli. We also acquire VB controlled by Private stimuli where others cannot make Direct contact with those stimuli. We tact itches, pains, nausea etc. How is it accomplished?
Skinner’s Analysis of Private Events & his Radical Behaviorism
6)
6) 4 ways: 2 involving Indirect contact with the Pvt stimuli (common public accompaniment & collateral response): Two involving Direct contact with stimuli that are first public but still control VB when they become Private (common properties and response reduction)
*Public Accompaniment
- Occurs when an observable stimulus Accompanies a private stimulus. For e.g. a father may observe a child bump his head on a table while chasing a ball
- The Public stimuli are available to the father, but not the private and more salient painful stimuli experienced by the child. The father can assume the child is experienced Pain & may say ouch or you hurt urself. In this way, the father is using the bump (observable stimulus) as an opportunity to develop VB under the stimulus control of a pvt stimulus
Collateral Responses
- Parents also teach their children to Tact their Pvt stimuli by using Collateral responses that Reliably occur with Private Stimuli
- The Same Training procedures with public accompaniment can be used with collateral responses (echoic to tact transfer)
Skinner’s Analysis of PVT Events & his Radical Behaviorism
- The Next 2 procedures use Public stimuli to establish Tacting of PVT events
- Common Properties: involve Public stimuli, but in a Different way.
- A speaker may learn to tact temporal, geometrical or descriptive properties of objects & then Generalize those tact relations to PVT stimuli
- As Skinner (1957) noted “Most of the vocab of emotion is metaphorical in nature. When we describe internal states as ‘agitated’, depressed, or ebullient certain geometrical, temporal & intensive properties have produced a metaphorical extension of responses
Skinner’s Analysis of Private Events & his Radical Behaviorism
- Respondent Reduction: Most speakers learn to tact features of their Own bodies such as movements & positions. The Kinesthetic stimuli arising from the movement & positions can acquire control over the Verbal responses
- When movements shrink in size the Kinesthetic stimuli may remain sufficiently similar to those resulting from the overt movements that the learner’s tact occurs as an instance of stimulus Generalization
Skinner’s “radical Behaviorism” is primarily related to his analysis of:
a) Verbal Behavior
b) The speaker and the listener
c) Private events
d) Multiple control
3) Private events
Public accompaniment occurs when:
a) An observable stimulus occurs along with a private stimulus
b) An observable Bx occurs along with a private stimulus
c) Particular properties of a public stimulus generalize to those of a private stimulus
d) Overt movements shrink in size & become covert
a) An observable stimulus occurs along with a private stimulus
Collateral responses occur when:
1) Particular properties of a public stimulus generalize to those of a PVT stimulus
2) An observable BX occurs along with a PVT stimulus
3) Overt movements shrink in size & become covert
4) An observable stimulus occurs along with a PVT stimulus
2) An observable BX occurs along with a PVT stimulus
Common properties occur when:
a) Overt movements shrink in size & become covert
b) An observable stimulus occurs along with a PVT stimulus
c) Particular properties of a public stimulus generalize to those of a PVT stimulus
d) An observable BX occurs along with a PVT stimulus
c) Particular properties of a public stimulus generalize to those of a PVT stimulus
Response reduction occurs when:
a) An observable stimulus occurs along with a PVT stimulus
b) Particular properties of a public stimulus generalize to those of a PVT stimulus
c) An observable Bx occurs along with a Pvt stimulus
d) Overt movements shrink in size & become covert
d) Overt movements shrink in size & become covert
In Skinner’s analysis of Private events, part of the env is contained within a person’s skin and __________
a) Must be accounted for in the analysis of Bx
b) Can not be measured, thus is not an antecedent/Bx
c) Will eventually be identified by advancements in medicine
d) Should be ignored
a) Must be accounted for in the analysis of Bx
What the Autoclitic Is?
-“Part of Bx of an Organism becomes in turn 1 of the variables Controlling another part. There are a-tleast 2 systems of responses, 1 based upon the other. The upper level can Only be understood in terms of its relation to the lower level”
What the Autoclitic Is?
Contd….
- A theme throughout VB is that a speaker can & often does, function as his/her own listener
- “Converting the speaker into an interested Bystander is certainly the direction in which an analysis of Bx will 1st move”
- The term “autoclitic” is intended to suggest (verbal) Bx which is based upon/depends upon Other VB
- In common sense terms the autoclitic is verbal Bx about a speaker’s own VB
- “Autoclitic Bx is concerned with practical action/with responses on the part of the listener”
- Autoclitic Bx increases the probability that the listener will behave Appropriately
What the Autoclitic Is
Contd….
- There are always 2 related, but separate 3-term Contingencies to analyze in autoclitic relations
- Skinner identified these 2 levels of verbal Bx as a “Standard relation” & “an Autoclitic relation”
- Micheal (1992) suggested that these 2 levels of VB be identified as Primary verbal operants (standard relation) & Secondary verbal operants (Autoclitic relations)
What the Autoclitic is
Contd….
The Primary verbal operants are
- Mand
- Tact
- Echoic (copying a text)
- Intraverbal
- Textual
- Transcription
The Autoclitic Tact (Contd…)
-Peterson (1978) suggested that Secondary Verbal BX be identified (or sub-divided) as either “autoclitic tacts” or “autoclitic mands” depending on the Source of control relevant to the specific autoclitic to be analyzed
The Autoclitic Tact (Contd…)
-The autoclitic tact “Informs the listener” with respect to some nonverbal aspect of the primary response (including its controlling variables) and is therefore controlled by nonverbal stimuli
The Autoclitic Tact (Contd…)
- Autoclitic Tact
- Child tacts the Controlling variables of his own VB
- I see
- Child tacts that it is visual Sd of Mommy is the source of control for the primary tact “mommy”
- I Think: Child tacts Weakness of the nonverbal source of control & its relation to the primary tact “Mommy”
- “I Hear”: Child tacts that it is an Auditory Sd of Mommy that is the source of control for the primary tact “Mommy”
The Autoclitic Tact e.g.
-Autoclitic responding is Shaped by listeners in several ways for e.g., if a father is wrapping a gift for his child’s mother & the child nearby says, “mommy”, the father may mand to the child to identify the source of control for the response, “mommy” as in, “Did you see her?”
The Autoclitic Tact (contd….)
- The father may Differentially respond to “I see” indicating that clearly “Mommy” is a Tact and the gift should be hidden, rather than just a mand for mommy, in which case it is okay to keep wrapping the Gift
- It could also be that the source of Control for the Response “mommy” is the gift, as in “That is for Mommy. The autoclitic “That is for” informs the listener that the exact source of nonverbal control for the primary tact “mommy” is the gift & the father can continue wrapping
The Autoclitic Tact (Contd…)
“An autoclitic affects the listener by indicating either a property of the Speaker’s Bx or the Circumstances responsible for that Property”
-The autoclitic mand “enjoins the listener” ti behave in some way with respect to the primary response & is controlled by MOs
The Autoclitic Mand (Contd…)
- Autoclitic mands occur frequently to manipulate listener Bx in ways Reinforcing to a particular speaker
- In the Autoclitics mand there is some specific MO that is controlling the secondary response
The Autoclitic Mand (Contd…)
- Autoclitic mands are Ubiquitos, but since the sources of control are pvt it is difficult for a listener to Tact the fact that MOs are controlling the VB
- “Hidden Agendas” often reveal themselves to a careful observer who identifies the autoclitic mands that may accompany primary verbal BX
The Autoclitic Mand E.g.
A primary intraverbal such as an Ans to a ques about the sales of a particular product may contain an autoclitic Mand such as “I’m sure you will be pleased with the sales” where “ I’m sure you will be pleased” is controlled by the same MO that might control the response “Don’t ask me for any details about the sales”
The Autoclitic (contd…)
-The distinction btw what is, and what is not autoclitic Bx, is often difficult, but cannot be made on the Basis of the response firm alone (a major theme in the analysis of all verbal Bx)