Unit 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the functions of tort?

A

Compensation
Deterrence
Justice
Vindication of Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the limitation period?

A

Limitations Act 1980
6 years from when the cause of action arises
Claim for defamation must be brought within 1 year
Personal injuries must be brought within 3 years
U18- relevant period of time does not start to run until the child reaches 18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Structure for tort of trespass to the person?

A

Define the relevant tort- requirements of battery/ assault

Defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is trespass to the person?

A

Umbrella term, describes three separate torts

  • Assault
  • Battery
  • False imprisonment

Actionable per se- claimant needn’t;t prove tangible physical harm in order to sue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define assault

A

Intentional act by defendant that causes another person to reasonably apprehend the immediate infliction of a battery upon him

  • Intentional is necessary (Letang v Cooper)
  • Immediate (R v Ireland ‘within a minute or so’)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define battery

A

Intentional direct application of unlawful force to another person

  • Intentional, intend actions not consequences (Wilson v Pringle)
  • Unlawful force- physical contact which is generally acceptable in ordinary conduct of everyday life won’t be unlawful (F v West Berkshire Health Authority)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the case law concerning assault by words alone?

A

Read v Coker- historically no
R v Ireland- ‘a thing said is a thing done’
Turberville v Savage- words can also negate an assault )(‘if we weren’t being watched’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the defences to trespass to the person?

A

Consent

Lawful Arrest

Defence of the person (self defence)

Defence of property

Necessity

Contributory Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the defence of consent

A

Can be express or implied
Sports- competitor consents not only to conduct within rules of sport but also conduct outside of rules that is in spirit of the sport (Condon v Basi)

Medical- patient deemed to have consented to medical treatment once informed in broad terms of nature of procedure (Chatterton v Gerson)

Medical- doctor’s failure to disclose risks will NOT invalidate patient’s consent (Chester v Afshar)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the defence of the person (Self defence)

A

Cockroft v Smith
Force must be used as self-defence and not retaliation
Force must be reasonable
Force must be proportionate to that used or threatened by claimant

Defence extends to protecting other members of family and employer/ employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the defence of property

A

Take reasonable steps to eject trespasser (which may involve asking trespasser to leave)- Green v Goddard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the defence of necessity

A

Defendant must show

  • Situation of necessity exists
  • Actions were reasonable in the circumstances of the case

F v West Berkshire Health Authority- two situations where necessity could justify treating an adult with consent

  • Emergency situation
  • State of affairs that renders the patient incapable of giving consent (Stroke)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the defence of contributory negligence

A

Not available as a defence to assault and battery
Provocation is not a defence in tort
Co-operative Group Ltd v Pritchard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in Wilkinson v Downton

A

If action falls outside of what is recognised by existing law then tort claim will fail unless claimant can convince court to change law

  • Defendant told claimant joke that husband had been in an accident, this induced shock and serious permanent physical consequences
  • New cause of action created
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the application of Wilkinson v Downton

A

No cause of action would lie unless the reluctant damage to the claimant amounted to a medically recognised condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the structure for answering questions on the tort of defamation?

A
  • State claimant may sue defendant for damages in tort of defamation
  • List the essential elements of defamation
  • Defences
17
Q

What are the essential elements of defamation?

A

Defendant’s words are defamatory

  • Sim v Stretch: lower claimant in eyes of right thinking members of society
  • Youssoupoff: cause the claimant to be shunned/ avoided
  • Parminter v Coupland: expose claimant to hatred, contempt or ridicule

Words refer to claimant
J’Ansonv Stewart- is description so detailed, resemblance so strong that reasonable person who knew claimant would assume article is about him

Words have been published

18
Q

What are the defences to defamation?

A

Trust (s2 Defamation Act 2013)

Honest opinion (s3 Defamation Act 2013)

Publication on a matter of public interest (s4 Defamation Act 2013)

Qualified Privilege (common law defence)