unit 1 Flashcards
enlightenment
European intellectual movement in the 18th century that had much influence over the framers of Constitution
natural rights
people are born with certain rights given by their creator, rights that cannot be taken away by anyone; theoretical state of nature where humans were free
popular sovereignty
by nature, the power to govern is in the hands of the people
social contract
in order to protect their natural rights, people willingly give away some of their power to a government (rights for safety)
republicanism
people elect leaders to represent them, powers of government are separated
limited government
a government that is prevented from tyranny through a system of checks and balances and the distribution of power among several acting members
participatory democracy
emphasizes broad participation in the political process by most, if not all, members of a society; doesn’t work with America because we’re just too big, but is seen at local levels
pluralist democracy
groups of people associate with interest groups who then compete to influence policy; giving people voice in groups, such as NAACP, National Rifle Association
elite democracy
emphasizes more limited participation in policymaking on the assumption that government is complicated and therefore only the most educated people need to run it (electoral college)
where can we see the types of democracy in the constitution?
elite democracy: elected representatives legislate on behalf of their people
pluralist democracy: first amendment’s freedom of assembly; allows political parties and interest groups to flourish
participatory democracy: first amendment’s freedoms of speech and press; allows people to express their political opinions
Brutus 1
championed a broad, participatory model; feared the curtailment of personal liberties reflected in a larger republic like the US
Federalist 10
argued that with so many competing factions in a large republic, liberty would be upheld by their competition (pluralist democracy)
federalists vs. anti-federalists
should the states ratify (accept) the new Constitution as law or no?
majority rule vs. minority rights
in a republic government, the majority will rule, but the minority shouldn’t be oppressed
factions
groups of people who believe their interests are more important than any other interest
federalist 10
Madison was concerned about factions in government; if the majority voice prevailed then the minority would never be represented…
Madison proposed solution: try to manage effects, appealing to the size and diversity of the US; too many factions in a large country, so they fight against each other and cancel out, which is why we need a large republic
ALSO double protection against tyranny of factions
brutus 1
anti-federalists were very weary of the new Constitution because it invested the federal government with a lot more power than it had under the Articles; argued about the dangers of a large, centralized government (especially necessary & proper clause and supremacy clause)
anti-federalist supporters were participatory democracy fans
“a large, centralized government cannot adequately represent the views of the people because it would be largely separated from them”
Articles of Confederation
federal government was weak, state governments were strong (monarchy hangover); only one branch of federal government: Congress