Understanding Internal Control and Assessing Control Risk Flashcards
1
Q
- AU-C 315 divides internal control into five components, and the nature of each: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring.
- The seven control environment factors are Integrity and ethical values, Commitment to competence, Human resource policies and practices, Assignment of authority and responsibility, Management’s philosophy and operating style, Board of directors or audit committee participation, and Organizational structure. Remember this using mnemonic IC HAMBO.
- The following are considered risks that may affect an entity’s ability to properly record, process, summarize, and report financial data: Changes in the operating environment, New personnel, New information systems. Rapid growth, New technology, New lines products or activities, Corporate restructuring, Foreign operations, or Accounting pronouncements
A
- Major Components of Internal Control
2
Q
- The third component of internal control is composed of the various policies and procedures that help ensure that necessary actions are taken to address risks to achieving the entity’s objectives. These include performance reviews, Information processing, physical controls, and segregation of duties.
- To be effective, the information and communication system should accomplish the following foals for transactions: Identify and record all valid transactions, Describe on a timely basis, Measure the value properly, Record in the proper time period, Properly present and disclose, and Communicate responsibilities to employees.
- Monitoring assesses the quality of internal control over time.
A
- Major Components of Internal Control
3
Q
- A control seldom relates to all important assertions. For example, a control over processing sales orders might be effective at determining the existence of receivables, but would not directly address receivables valuations, or completeness.
- Internal control provides reasonable but not absolute assurance that specific entity objectives will be achieved.
- Previously, the AICPA Professional Standards distinguished between administrative and accounting controls, stating that auditors generally emphasize the latter. While the distinction no longer remains for purposes of the professional standards, it does remain in certain laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
A
- Related Topics
4
Q
- The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is a law passed by Congress in 1977 with provisions requiring every corporation registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to maintain a system of strong internal accounting control, requiring corporations to maintain accurate books and records, and making it illegal for individuals or business entities to make payments to foreign officials to secure business. Violations of the Act can result in fines and imprisonment of the responsible individuals.
- The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations is composed of representatives from various professional organizations, including the AICPA, Institute of Management Accountants, Financial Executives Institute, Institute of Internal Auditors, and American Accounting Association. COSO commissions a study for the purpose of integrating various internal control concepts and definitions being used in the business community. The purposes of the study are to establish a common definition of internal control and to provide a standard against which business and other entities can assess internal control.
- The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 created a variety of new regulations and eliminated a significant portion of the accounting profession’s system of self-regulation. Three relevant sections include:
A
- Related Topics
5
Q
- Section 302: Makes officiers responsible for maintaining effective internal control and requires the principal executive and financial officers to disclose all significant internal control deficiencies to the company’s auditors and audit committee.
- Section 404: Requires that management acknowledge its responsibility for establishing adequate internal control over financial reporting and provide an assessment in the annual report of the effectiveness of internal control.
- Section 906: Requires that management certify reports filed with the SEC (primarily annual 10-K and quarterly 10-Qs) that the reports comply with relevant securities laws and also fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the company.
A
- Related Topics
6
Q
- The audit performs risk assessment procedures to obtain an understanding of the five components of internal control sufficient to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements, and to design the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures
- AU-C 315 distinguishes between determining that controls have been implemented vs. evaluating their operational effectiveness. In determining whether controls have been implemented, the auditor determines that the entity is using them.
- In evaluating operative effectiveness, the auditor goes further and considers how the control was applied, the consistency with which it was applied, and by whom (or what means) it is applied.
A
- Obtain An Understanding of Internal Control
7
Q
- The auditor should obtain an sufficient knowledge to understand management’s and the board of director’s attitude, awareness, and actions considering the control environment.
- The auditor should obtain a sufficient knowledge to understand how management considers risks relevant to financial reporting objectives and decides about actions to address those risks.
- The auditor needs to obtain a level of knowledge of the information systems and communication to understand the major transaction classes, how those transactions are initiated, the available accounting records and support, the manner of processing of transactions, the financial reporting process used to prepare financial statements, and the means the entity uses to communicate financial reporting roles and responsibilities.
A
- Obtain An Understanding of Internal Control
8
Q
- The auditor should obtain sufficient knowledge of the major types of monitoring activities the entity uses to monitor internal control over financial reporting, including how those activities are used to initiate corrective action.
- The auditor relies primarily upon a combination of previous experience with the entity, inquiries, inspection of documents and records, and observation of entity activities to obtain the needed understanding of the internal control.
- AU-C 315 points out that while obtaining an understanding of the design of a control, including whether it has been implemented, an auditor may either by plan or by chance obtain some information on operative effectiveness.
A
- Obtain An Understanding of Internal Control
9
Q
- The auditor’s documentation of his/her understanding of internal control for purposes of planning the audit is influenced by the size and complexity of the entity as well as the nature of the entity’s internal control.
A
- Obtain An Understanding of Internal Control
10
Q
- The effectiveness of internal control is important in many situations since particular controls may lessen the likelihood that risks could result in material misstatements.
- The decision sequence for considering internal control for the assertions related to classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures depends upon whether controls appear effective.
- The overall approach as it relates to controls is to identify controls that are relevant to specific assertions that are likely to prevent or detect material misstatements, and perform tests of controls to evaluate the effectiveness of those controls.
A
- Assess Risks of Material Misstatement and Design Further Audit Procedures
11
Q
- Alternatively the risk assessment may not include an expectation that controls operate effectively. This will be the case when either controls appear weak or the auditor believes that performing extensive substantive procedures is likely to be more cost effective than performing a combination of tests of controls and a decreased scope of substantive procedures.
- When designing further audit procedures the auditor may design a test of controls to be performed concurrently with a substantive procedure test of details on the same transaction.
- Although the objectives of tests of controls and tests of details differ, both may be accomplished concurrently through performance of a test of controls and a test of details on the same transaction. This is known as a dual purpose test.
A
- Assess Risks of Material Misstatement and Design Further Audit Procedures
12
Q
- For reasons of efficiency and practicality, auditors often perform tests of controls at an interim date prior to year-end and then update them to the extent considered necessary at year-end
- Is an auditor allowed to use the results of prior years’ tests of controls in the current audit? PCAOB standards do not allow this while Auditing Standards allow this in limited circumstances.
- When controls have changed since they were last tested, the auditor should test the operative effectiveness of such controls in the current audit. In circumstances where controls have not changed since they were last tested, the auditor should test the operating effectiveness of such controls at least once in every three years.
A
- Perform Tests of Controls
13
Q
- Generally IT processing is inherently consistent. Therefore, the auditor may be able to limit the testing to one or a few instances of the control operation.
- Based on the results of the tests of controls, the auditor will determine whether it is necessary to modify the substantive procedures. If tests of control reveal that the system operatives as expected, there will be generally no need to change the scope of planned substantive procedures. Conversely, if the system does not operate as effectively as expected (control risk is higher than expected), the scope of substantive procedures for the relevant assertions involved will increase (thereby decreasing detection risk)
A
- Perform Tests of Controls
14
Q
- Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires internal control reporting my management and the auditor.
- Section 404A requires management to include its assessment of internal control in the annual report filed with the SEC. Section 404B requires the CPA firm to audit internal control and express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control. As implemented, the Act applies to companies with a market capitalization of $75,000,000 or more.
- Both PCAOB Standard 5 and SSAE 15 require when performing an audit of internal control that the auditor examine the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to provide a sufficient basis to issue an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control in preventing or detecting material misstatements of the financial statements.
A
- Audits (Examinations) of Internal Control
15
Q
- Objective of audit of internal control is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control. To form a basis for such an opinion, an auditor should plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material weaknesses exist as of the date of management’s assessment.
- Deficiency occurs when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.
- A significant deficiency is when a deficiency or combination of deficiencies that occur in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting.
A
- Audits (Examinations) of Internal Control