Underlying Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Constitutional Standing Provisions

A

Cases and Controversies Clause, Art. III, § 2, cl. 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Constitutional Standing Cases

A

Lujan, Massachusetts v. EPA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

APA Standing Provision

A

§ 702 (Zone of Interest).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Non-Delegation Principle Provision

A

Vesting Clause, Art. I § 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intelligible Principle Provision

A

Separation of Powers, Vesting Clause, Art. I § 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intelligible Principle Cases

A

Hampton, Schechter, Witman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Major Question Provisions

A

Separation of Powers, Accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Major Question Cases

A

West Virginia v. EPA, Tobacco, [OSHA (Subject Matter)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(INVALID) Legislative Veto Provisions

A

Violates the Presentment Clause, Art. I §7, cl. 2 & 3. Violates bicameralism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(INVALID) Legislative Veto Cases

A

Chadha

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Appropriations Provisions

A

Formalistic Requirement of Vesting Claus, Art. I § 1. & Spending Power art. I, § 8, cl. 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Appropriations Cases

A

Robertson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(INVALID) Line Item Veto Provisions

A

Unconstitutional legislating, violates the vesting clause, Art. I § 1. etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(INVALID) Line Item Veto Case

A

Clinton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Presidential Powers Provisions

A

Art. II, § 1, cl. 1 (unitary executive); § 2, cl. 1 (commander in chief); § 3 (faithfully execute).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Presidential Powers Cases

A

Youngstown Steel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Executive Orders Provisions

A

Faithfully execute, Art. II, § 3.

18
Q

Executive Orders Cases

A

Trump, DAPA, Tabacco.

19
Q

Appointments Provisions

A

Art. II, § 2, cl. 2.

Ineligibility and Incompatibility Clause: Art. I, § 6, cl. 2.

20
Q

Appointments Cases

A

Buckley, N.L.R.B. Canning.

21
Q

Removals Provisions

A

Art. II, § 2, cl. 2.

22
Q

Removals Cases

A

Myers, Humphrey’s Executor, Morrison, Saila Law, Free Enterprise.

23
Q

APA Definitions and Scope

A

§ 551.

24
Q

APA Cause of Action Provision

A

§ 702 (“Any person suffering a legal wrong…”).

25
Q

APA Cause of Action EXCEPTIONS Provisions

A

§ 701 (enabling act & action is in agency discretion).

26
Q

APA Application/Review Provisions

A

§ 706.

27
Q

APA Application/Review Cases

A

New Rule: Overton Park. 

Rescission: State Farm, DHS. 

Change: DoC (Pretext), Fox.

Inaction: Massachusetts v. EPA.

28
Q

Fact/Policy Review—De Novo Provision

A

§ 706(2)(F).

29
Q

Fact/Policy Review—Arbitrary & Capricious Provision

A

§ 706(2)(A).

30
Q

Fact/Policy Review—Arbitrary & Capricious Cases

A
  • New Rule: Overton Park. 

  • Rescission: State Farm, DHS.
  • 
Change: DoC (Pretext), Fox.
  • Inaction: Massachusetts v. EPA.
31
Q

Fact/Policy Review—Substantial Evidence Provision

A

§ 706(2)(E).

32
Q

Fact/Policy Review—Substantial Evidence Case

A

Universal Camera.

33
Q

Interpretation of Statute—Deference
Provision

A

§ 706 (“the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions…”).

34
Q

Interpretation of Statute—Deference Cases

A
  • Who Interprets?: Hearst Publication, Skidmore, Chevorn. 

  • Step One: MCI Telecommunications, Babbitt, (National Cable & Telecom).
  • Extraordinary Cases: Tabacco, Massachusetts v. EPA. 

  • Step Two: Utility Air, (National Cable & Telecom).
  • Step “Zero”: Mead Corp., City of Arlington.
35
Q

Interpretation of Regulation—Deference Provision

A

§ 706 (“the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions…”).

36
Q

Interpretation of Regulation—Deference Cases

A

Auer, Kisor.

37
Q

Informal Procedure Provisions

A

§ 553: 

(b) Notice; 

(c) Comment;

(c) Concise General Statement.

38
Q

Informal Procedure Cases

A
  • Formal vs. Informal: Allegheny-Lundlum Steel, Florida East Coast Ry.

  • Notice: Chocolate Manufacturers, Long Island Care. 

  • Concise General Statement: Nova Scotia Food. 

  • Comment: HBO, Sierra Club, Volpe, Association of National Advertisers.
39
Q

Judicially Create Procedure Cases

A

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Vermont Yankee.

40
Q

Informal Procedure Exceptions Provisions

A

§ 553: 

(a)(1) military or foreign affairs; 

(a)(2) agency management;

…

(b)(3)(A) interpretative rules;
(b)(3(B) for good cause.

41
Q

Informal Procedure Exceptions Cases

A
  • Interpretative Rules: National Family Planning; Hoctor; Texas v. United States. 

  • Agency Management: Lincoln.