UK Prime Minister and Executive Flashcards
what does ‘primus inter pares’ mean?
first among equals
what is Kavanagh’s theory of the office of the Prime Minster?
That Blair’s impact would be more permanent. Two types of change: dramatic increase in size of importance of Cabinet Office and Prime Ministers Private Office and change in Prime Ministers relationships with other bodies; importance of party and of parliament decreased.
what is Hennessy’s theory of the Office of Prime Minister?
that the office is capable of being shaped by the office holder according to their wishes and according to circumstances as Britain is a parliamentary democracy and is a open, pluralist society
what is an example of a ministerial resignation over IMR due to personal misconduct?
Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell in 2012 as he was accused of insulting policemen in downing street.
what is an example of a ministerial resignation over IMR due to mistakes made within departments and how common are these types of resignations?
Agriculture minister sir Thomas Dugdale resigned in 1954 when mistakes made by civil servants in the Crichel Down case came to light.
Such cases are rare - reports into the sale of arms to Iraq and BSE uncovered mistakes in departments but no minister resigned.
arguments that the prime minister has become more presidential?
- leadership in the executive has been personalised, with the prime minister expected to impose his or her personality and agenda
- prime ministers increasingly rely on a close circle of senior ministers and advisers
- prime ministers have created a ‘strategic space’ between themselves and their governments, distancing themselves from other actors in the executive
- prime ministers appeal to the public directly, through the media, and claim a personal mandate from the electorate
- prime ministers have additional authority as party leaders, where they are elected by MPs and members, and exercise personalised leadership
arguments that the prime minister has not become more presidential?
- the prime minister leads but cannot command the executive, particularly in coalition, and directs rather than controls the agenda
- senior ministers have resources of their own, including support from government departments
- the prime minister needs the support of ministers and officials to achieve his or her objectives
- the prime ministers position is strong only if he or she enjoys policy success and popular approval, and makes effective use of his or her personal abilities
- support from the party is not unconditional and unpopular leaders face concerted efforts to remove them
arguments that the powers of patronage and appointing ministers does invest the prime minister with significant powers?
- can appoint to house of lords and alter party balance (Blair appointed 162 labour peers)
- can appoint and dismiss cabinet ministers
- in theory can reward supporters and penalise disloyal MPs
- can reshuffle cabinet
what are the three trends central to presidentialisation?
- personalised leadership (eg Thatcher and Blair)
- Public Outreach (eg Blair and Cameron)
- Spatial Leadership (Blairs ‘sofa government’ and the ‘Quad’)
arguments that the powers of patronage and appointing ministers does not invest the prime minister with significant powers?
- The honours system: a policy inquiry into allegations of ‘cash for honours’ ended in 2007 without criminal charges being brought but it led to changes to the prime ministers role in the honours system. nominations now considered by honours committees made up of civil servants and people independent of government. prime minister accepts their list.
- the Prime minister now plays no role in judicial appointments and is only given one name to ecclesiastical appointments
- some colleagues may have claims to posts and may cause issues if not appointed
- 2010 coalition required David Cameron to appoint 5 liberal democrats to his cabinet
- a prime minister is unlikely to overlook senior party figures who may be rivals for their job
- In 2016, 15 ministers who had attended cabinet under Cameron, including George Osborne and Michael Gove, were not appointed to Mays first cabinet
- Ideological considerations also important (most ministers in Mays cabinet had campaigned to remain in the EU but leave campaigners were put in charge of departments that would deliver)
- power to cabinet reshuffle can backfire (eg Margaret Thatchers demotion of foreign secretary Sir Geoffrey Howe in 1989 had damaging consequences because his resignation a year later triggered Thatchers downfall)
arguments that party leadership invests the prime minister with significant powers?
- government usually has a majority
- labour and conservative leaders are elected by their MPs and party members and this legitimises their position
- May won leadership election against Brexit candidates
arguments that party leadership does not invest the prime minister with significant powers?
- Increased rebellion by backbench MPs means that a prime minister cannot always rely on party support (eg the conservative-lib dem coalition governments proposals on reform of House of Lords were dropped after a rebellion by conservative MPs and conservative rebellions on EU issues contributed to Camerons decision to a referendum on membership)
- Brown - no leadership election
arguments that public standing invests the prime minister with significant powers?
-Thatcher and Blair made a significant impact on the world stage and had a strong relationship with the President of the US
arguments that public standing does not invest the prime minister with significant powers?
- Obama not interested in ‘special relationship’ affecting Brown and Cameron
- Gordon Brown not good at ‘celebrity’
arguments that authority in cabinet and policy making input invests the prime minister with significant powers?
- The prime minister chairs cabinet meetings, manages the agenda of cabinet meetings, and determines their frequency and length, directs and sums up cabinet discussions, creates cabinet committees and appoints their members, holds bilateral meetings with ministers, appoints senior civil servants and organises the structure of governments
- the prime minister can establish cabinet committees to drive forward their agenda (In 2016 May established and chaired a new economy and industrial strategy committee)
- the prime ministers policy-making role is not confined to a specific field. They have a license to get involved in issues across the political spectrum
- The prime minister is important when crises occur and takes and active interest in economic and foreign policy
- Thatcher played an active role in policy fields and in instances of policy success e.g. The Falklands wars strengthened her position
- Restructuring of Dept for education