UK Democracy and Political Participation Flashcards
what does democracy mean?
a system where power is held by ‘the people’
what is direct democracy?
a system where the people are able to make decisions directly on an issue, usually in the form of a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response
what is representative democracy?
a system where the people elect a person or group of people to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf
what is a liberal democracy?
a form of democracy in which the right to vote will be widespread and representatives will act in the interest of everyone in society
what is a majoritarian democracy?
a system whereby the will or desires of the majority of the population are the prime considerations of the government
what is a parliamentary democracy?
a system where parliament stands as the highest form of authority. the executive branch will be drawn from and accountable to the peoples representatives in parliament
what is a presidential democracy?
this is a system where the executive will be elected separately from the legislative body and is therefore chosen by and directly accountable to the people
what is a pluralist democracy?
a system of government where there is competition between different groups who represent popular concerns to the government of the day
what are the functions of democracy?
representation, accountability, participation, power dispersal, legitimacy, education
what is an initiative?
a means by which the people, rather than the government, can call for a vote on a specific issue
what is a petition?
an appeal to make something specific happen, usually be demonstrating a high level of popular support
what are arguments in favour of direct democracy?
- a pure form of democracy
- increased legitimacy
- improves participation
- increases public engagement
- improves political education
- it works
what are arguments against direct democracy?
- it is not practical
- tyranny of the majority
- undermines elected representatives
- low turnouts
- emotional responses
- populist outcomes
what are positive aspects of democracy in the uk?
Free and fair elections, turnout,
universal suffrage, the party system, pressure groups, parliamentary sovereignty and devolution
what does purdah mean?
a phrase used to describe the period before an election of vote where members of local councils or government are not allowed to make any new statements or proposals that could affect the way people vote. the period is usually 4 or 6 weeks.
what is the electoral commission?
created in 2000 by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act. The commission is independent from government and party influence and has they key responsibility of overseeing and strengthening democracy in the UK.
how has turnout been changing in recent years?
historic averages: 75%
1997: 71%
2001: 59%
2005: 62%
2010: 65%
2015: 66%
2017: 69%
2019: 67.3%
2016 local council: 34.33%
Scottish independence referendum: 84.6%
EU referendum: 72%
what is a pressure group?
a group of like-minded individuals who come together on the basis of shared interests or a commonly held cause in order to put pressure on policy-makers at Westminster and beyond
what does democratic deficit mean?
a term used to describe the undemocratic nature of institutions or procedures that are supposed to promote democracy
what are negative aspects of democracy in the uk?
unelected elements, turnout, the west lothian question and EVEL, the voting system, lack of meaningful choice, elitist pressure groups, weaknesses of the electoral commission, lack of entrenched rights
what is an example of the house of lords negatively affecting democracy?
In October 2015 the House of Lords rejected a series of proposed cuts to the tax credit system. The proposals had recently been passed by a narrow vote in the House of Commons. The government then dropped plans to make the cuts but the situation raised questions over the nature and democratic legitimacy of the Lords:
- they were in the conservative manifesto so had a mandate to be carried out so under the salisbury doctrine the lords shouldn’t have rejected them
- the government presented it as a financial measure which the lords aren’t allowed to reject though the lords claimed it was a welfare bill
- the lords saw it as a piece of delegated legislation which meant they had the power to veto it
- the peers who rejected it were mostly labour and lib dem peers who had just lost the general election
- Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber, a conservative peer who resides in the USA flew to the UK to vote despite not being affected by the issue
how are rights in the uk undermined?
- freedom of speech - creation of ‘safe spaces’
- freedom of protest - measures taken to restrict protests outside of parliament
- right to vote - prisoners no right to vote
- right to due process - governments have been able to extend the period of detention without charge under the terrorism act to 28 days in 2006
what is the franchise?
the right to vote in elections
what was the Great Reform Act 1832?
voting rights were extended to property owners
what did the Representation of the People Act 1928 do?
extended the franchise to all citizens over the age of 21
what did the Representation of the People Act 1969 do?
extend the franchise to all people over the age of 18
who were the suffragists?
- the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies
- used peaceful methods of protest
- more than 100,000 members by 1914
who were the suffragettes?
- the Women’s Social and Political Union
- organisation run by Pankhurts
- used violent and illegal methods of protest
what groups have campaigned to give at least some prisoners the right to vote?
Howard League for Penal Reform, the Prison Reform Trust, and Amnesty International
what case declared the blanket ban on all prisoners voting was a violation of their human rights (UK)?
Hirst v UK (2005)
arguments for prisoners being given the right to vote?
- the denial of the right to vote removes a sense of civic responsibility, making rehabilitation harder.
- there is no evidence that the loss of the franchise acts as a deterrent
- the right to vote is fundamental and cannot be removed
- removal of the vote makes a prisoner a non-person and further alienates them from society
- the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the blanket ban on prisoners is a violation of the Human Rights Act
arguments against prisoners being given the right to vote?
- Those who commit a custodial crime against society should lose the right to have a say in how ghat society is run
- the threat of losing the right to vote prevents crime and enhances civic responsibility
- Giving convicted criminals the right to have a say in how laws are made would undermine the principle of justice
- Prisoners are concentrated in certain constituencies where they are unlikely to remain once free, so they should not be able to choose the local representatives for those communities.
what actions towards the franchise being extended to 16 and 17 year olds have taken place?
2011 - ‘votes at 16’ launches a new, interactive website to allow supporters to share it’s work
2015 - votes at 16 private members bill, proposed by Vicky Foxcroft MP, has its second reading in the House of Commons
2017- Liberal Democrats manifesto contained a commitment to lowering the voting age to 16
who is the votes at 16 group made up of
- British Youth Council
- Children’s Rights Alliance for England
- National Union of Students
- Public Achievement
- Scottish Youth Parliament
what are traditional methods of political participation?
voting, joining a party and helping it to campaign, joining a pressure group and helping to promote it, organising or signing a petition, going on a march, going on strike, writing a letter, standing for public office