UK POLITICS - Democracy and participation Flashcards

1
Q

Define democracy.

A

A political system in which all citizens have an equal right to participate in society’s decisions about policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are Dahl’s 5 key measures of democracy?

A
  • Equal and effective methods of participation
  • All person’s votes must be equal
  • Equal and effective opportunity to learn about possible choices and their effects
  • Oppurtunity to set the agenda
  • Universal suffrage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When did the UK start as a democracy? When did it finally become one?

A
  • Magna Carta 1215 was the roots of Western Liberal democracy
  • The Equal Franchise Act 1928 satisfied the last of Dahl’s 5 requirements of a democracy: universal suffrage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the source of direct democracy?

A

Ancient Greek, specifically Athenian, democracy relied on the participation of all citizens in open assemblies to make decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 key features of direct democracy?

A
  • The people themselves make policy decisions, rather than choosing who does on their behalf
  • There is no seperate class of professional politicians
  • People engage in politics regularly and as an ongoing activity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline the three institutions of the Ancient Greek democracy.

A
  • The Ekklesia: the open assembly where anyone could speak and debate on policy, though only some could hold attention, like Demosthenes
  • The Boule: a faux-civil service of 500 men decided by drawing lots (sortition)
  • The Dikasteria: 501 jurors chosen every day to resolve court cases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why did the Ancient Greeks use sortition?

A

Filling public office via random selection was seen as more democratic as it could not be swayed with money or popularity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a modern example of a direct democracy?

A

Although Taiwan does have a government with representatives, it’s incredibly low-bar for referendums since 2003 have given citizens unparalelled possibility to participate: in November 2018 alone, there was 10 citizen-led proposals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the core issue with direct democracy that required the creation of representatives?

A

Only a small percentage of the population can or want to devote a serious amount of time to political issues - this way that small precentage can be elected to do the heavy lifting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three key features of representative democracies?

A
  • Popular participation is indirect
  • Popular participation is mediated via representative institutions
  • Popular participation is more limited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three features of fair, democratic elections?

A
  • Freedom, fairness, regularity
  • Universal suffrage
  • Party and candidate competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How has oppurtunities to vote increased in the UK?

A
  • Universal suffrage since 1928
  • Elections to devolved governments since 1998
  • Increasing use of referendums
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 5 types of representation?

A
  • Social
  • National Interest
  • Constituency
  • Party
  • Causal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline social representation. Give an example

A

The idea that representative bodies should be an accurate cross-section of the characteristics of their representees so as to represent both their views and the experiences. Not done incredibly well in the UK, though improving (Starmer’s cabinet)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline representing the national interest. Give an example

A

As representatives sit in a national Parliament, they are expected to promote causes and policies that will benefit the wider UK, even if to the detriment of smaller groups. (Adrian Ramsey and NIMBY accusations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline constituency representation. Give an example.

A

Representatives are represented by their local constituents so in a more direct manner, should represent them. This is also easier than other types as people in the same geographical area will likely have the same issues and concerns to be addressed. (Jeremy Corbyn is one of the few independant MPs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the 3 aspects of constituency representation?

A
  • Representation of the whole constituency such as getting more funds
  • Representation of individual constituents, also known as redress of grievances
  • Simply listening to the views of constituents when voting on national issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline party representation. Give evidence

A

When most people are voting, they are voting for the policy and leadership of the party, rather than their local represenative so that representative is best representing them when they are towing the party line. (75% of people don’t know their local MP (BBC, 2015))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Outline causal representation. Give an example

A

When an MP supports and promotes a specific cause (like LGBTQ+ rights or environmentalism) or the uplifing of a certain group (reugees or veterans). In this way, they are representing everyone by making the country better on the whole. (MP Johnny Mercer’s fervent support of Veterans and 2020 resignation due to the government’s inadequate support)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How can direct democracies be more legitimate?

A

Direct democracy and popular participation means that all laws genuinly are ‘the will of the people’ so can more easily be justified in a democratic system. Representative democracies and the distance between people and politics can lead to apathy. (Labour only actually gained 20% of the electorate’s vote)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How does direct democracy lead to greater personal development?

A

Direct and popular participation forces people to actively engage in politics, becoming more active citizens and working to better society under their perspective. Representative democracy has little to no participation so people often become apathetic and don’t care to learn.
(More than 50% of people talk about politics a few times a month or less)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why would an end to professional politics be good?

A

Politicians often only seek to increase their own station, status, and wealth - not caring about the effect of their decisions on those they represent - a direct democracy would strike this possibility and increase the trust the public has in legislative decisions.
(In 2019, 63% of people felt the political game was rigged in the favour of the rich and powerful)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the efficacy issue with direct democracy?

A

It is not achievable on a large-scale: the 100,000 Athenians allowed to vote could more easily gather in one place and discuss than the 68 million UK citizens, instead we have a smaller number of representatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the labour issue with direct democracy?

A

It requires citizens to devote a large amount of time to political education, often getting in the way of other responsibilities; the Athenian solution was slavery and having women taking care of family life (neither of which would take part in democracy (3/5 of the population)), not a great solution. The modern solution is to give the burden to a class of people who wholly devote themselves to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the expertise issue with direct democracy?

A

People are very easily swayed to solutions to problems that appear more clear cut, often against their own interests - politicians have special education to know not to be swayed and to use their expertise to find the best possible solution.
(Brexit, fishers, and the CFP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Outline the forms of political participation in order of intensity

A
  • Standing for public office: many are full time politicians and dedicate their work lives to politics
  • Active party membership: campaigning, canvassing and generally being engaged with the workings of your party
  • Active pressure group membership: can mean attending or even organising demonstrations or direct action
  • Passive party or group membership: joining the group but not doing much more than voting
  • Digital activism: online movements that only require expression of support or signing e-petitions, etc.
  • Voting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is the issue with a lack of political participation?

A

If the population does not assert its will upon the democratic system, it becomes open to abuse and the preferential treatment to those who engage over those who do not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

How has political party membership changed over time?

A

In the 40’s and 50’s, political party membership was at its peak very possibly due to new found faith in democracy and growing optimism in the UK post-WWII (Conservatives leading with 3 million, excluding all the trade union members); since, there has been a steady decline due to growing apathy (conservatives possibly under 100,000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are the three exceptions to the decline in party membership and what does it mean?

A
  • Labour membership surged when Milliband decreased the fee to £3
  • Following the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum, SNP membership allegedly shot up to 100,000 in a population fo 5 million
  • There was a 50,000 member surge in UKIP in the run-up to the 2015 general election
    People still see political parties as vehicles for change, but only if promising something radical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is the counterpoint to decreased party membership as proof of declining participation?

A
  • Previously, political parties often represented a subsection of society that made it an obvious choice to be in that party if you were part of that group. It was natural to be a conservative member if you were an aristocrat because it was overtly in your interests
  • Socially it was also preferable to be apart as you were seen as alien otherwise
  • Labour’s drop since the 50’s can be attributed to its membership no longer being prerequired as joining a trade union
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the lowest turnout in history?

A

2001 - 59.4%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Give an argument and counterargument for the decreasing turnout as part of the participation crisis.

A

Steady increase since 2001 signifies renewed belief in politics - 2019 reaching 63% (on the rise)
Increased opportunities to vote (referendums and devolved bodies)

  • 2024 - 59.8%, the second lowest in recent history, likely due to dislike of both parties
  • 63% is still much lower than 84% in 1950
  • Referendums and devolved bodies have even lower turnout, possibly due to voter fatigue and an excess of oppurtunities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Give an argument and counterargument to individual politics in the participation crisis.

A

There has been growth in more individualistic forms of participation - e-petitions leading to things like the Hillsborough inquiry
- Increase in ‘political consumerism’ - such as with the boycott on McDonalds leading to a share fall of 4%.

  • ‘Slacktivism’, requires very little effort and shows less participation so still signalling a loss. However it does work, we may be in an age where participation is just easier.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Give an argument and counterargument to pressure groups in the participation crisis.

A

PGs closely represent specific goal unlike catch-all parties - Stonewall successfully lobbied the government to repeal Section 28, continue to be an invaluable resource for the defence of queer rights
Becoming more widespread - the Passion Collaboration: 1 in 10 adults in the UK are members of a pressure group.

  • Some have lost power, trade unions were once one of the guiding hands in politics (13.2 million members in 1979) but Blair was accused by the TUC head of treating them like “elderly relatives”. However, Starmer said he wanted a “partnership” with them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Give an argument and counterargument to direct action in the participation crisis.

A

Becoming incredibly common, with groups like BLM, Extinction Rebellion, and Just Stop Oil rising to prominence in 2020 - 15-26 mill people participated in BLM protests in America

  • Efficacy: Just Stop Oil likely harmed the movement with the Stone Henge spray paint
  • Democracy: is direct action democratic given its entire aim is to circumvent lobbying and the democratic system?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Give an argument and counterargument to 16 year olds being mature enough to vote.

A

Young people are old enough to be involved in politics - 20,000 young people in youth councils and over 600 elected members of youth Parliaments
Not being allowed to vote is an irrational limit, they join the military - in 2019, under-18s were the largest age group to join the military - 28%

  • Adolesence is a period of development and it should not be harmed by forcing responsibilities like voting onto them - Murray (1961). However, children are already exposed and burdened by politics as people within the system and were harmed by things like austerity cutting sure start.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Give an argument and counterargument to lowering the age of voting to increase participation.

A

Would encourage the young to learn about politics due to increased stake - 16/17 year olds having 75% turnout to Scottish referendum, compared to 54% of 18-24 Would reorient politics around issues the young are interested in and represent their values - Israel-Palestine

  • Worries about young people not voting leading to apathetic voters and a generation of abstainers. However, young people don’t vote because they feel disagentic in the political system - over-65s more than 2x as likely to vote remain than under-25s
38
Q

Give an argument and counterargument to 16 year olds being too radical to vote.

A

Young people are more likely to have incredibly radical political views spurred by a wish to seem cool (Watts (1999)) so may vote to gain social capital rather than for what’s best - 1/2 of Gen Z consider themselves Marxists

  • The old are also excessively radical, just conservative - 60% of people over 65 voted Leave. Additionally, given the rise of instant news and the internet, its an assumption to say the young are uneducated on their ideologies.
39
Q

Compulsory voting
Patricipation V Cosmetic democracy

A

Compulsory voting would easily solve the participation crisis, the historic low of 54.8% in 2024 would be done - Australia dealt with similar lows of 60% in 1924, till compulsory voting and 90% in 2022.

  • This doesn’t deal with the core issue that people aren’t engaging with democracy and politics - on average people spend 15 minutes a day reading the news and <1/2 the country talks about politics more than weekly.
40
Q

Compulsory voting
Legitimisation V Worthless votes

A

Governments in power would have the express will of an actual majority, as such their democratic function is strengthened and people are more likely to listen to them - Starmer has 20% of the actual electorate and Blair’s historic 179 seat majority was won with 30%.

  • People who don’t vote often care the least about politics, as such forcing them would only create more random votes or votes in line with the most recent scandal rather than policy or any actual evaluation. However, for the former, that is how a lot of people vote - Brown and Bigotgate despite taking us out of a recession
41
Q

Compulsory voting
Civic duty V Freedom

A

The more people are forced to vote, the more they will be socialised into the idea that they have to be full functional members of society, it is also one of the “duties to community” outlined in the UDHR

  • Freedom to vote is also freedom not to vote - abstention is as much a statement as voting.
  • Cohen (1972) would argue that abstention marks a system necessary for reform, making it compulsory would remove that warning.
42
Q

E-democracy
Ease V Participation

A

Making voting easier would be a great way to encourage young people to vote - 54% at Scot referendum
Old and disabled people may have an easier time voting

  • Old people already vote - 70+ turnout is almost double that of 18-24
  • Young and disabled people don’t not vote cause its difficult, they don’t feel represented - 50% of disabled people felt forgotten by politics and the political system has shifted right, alienating the largely leftist youth.
43
Q

E-democracy
Weakness and transparency

A

Online systems are much easier to sabotage and alter the votes of an election - Brazil has not allowed testing of their system since 2012 when a team of researchers were easily able to gain brief access to millions of lines of code.
Even if it’s not, that possibility can be manipulated - millions of people questioned whether the Russians had been involved in the 2016 Trump win and the 2020 Biden win was so questioned, it led to the Capitol riots.

  • The American system not digital, all systems are inherently weak on some level and it is unfair scrutiny against this system. However, there is more of an idea that its weak, which plays into the latter.
44
Q

E-democracy
Efficency and accuracy V Expense

A

Traditional counting takes time which can cause political disrest and may be disastrous in times of calamity, such as with the election just after WWII.
More accurate so leaves less room for scrutiny of results - in 2024, there were 7 states that required recounts and with results as close as North East Fife 2017 (2 votes).

  • AI not entirely accurate - Strawberries
  • This is an expensive product that may have marginal success - The COVID tracking app costed £37 million.
  • This is inherently less transparent as recounts become impossible if the vote is questioned.
45
Q

What are two names for the right to vote?

A
  • Suffrage
  • The franchise
46
Q

What are the three principles of UK suffrage?

A
  • Almost everyone over 18 has the right to vote in elections (save for convicts, the certified insane, and royals)
  • Electoral law does not discriminate
  • It is the responsibility of individuals to register to vote
47
Q

Give the evolution of Suffrage 1800-1900.

A
  • Great Reform Act (1832): enfranchises almost all middle-class male property owners, bringing the franchise to 6% (up from 4%)
  • Second Reform Act (1867): enfranchises all settled male tenants (giving the cote to much of the working-class)
  • Ballot Act (1872): introduces the secret ballot, inhibiting corrupt candidates from buying votes
  • Third Reform Act (1884): enfranchises almost all working men, 60% of all adults now have the right to vote
48
Q

Give the evolution of Suffrage 1900-

A
  • Representation of the People Act (1918): enfranchises most men and women over 30 who are married, property owners, or graduates
  • Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act (1928): extends franchise to all adults over 21
  • Representation of the People Act (1948): established the principle of ‘one-person-one-vote’
  • Representation of the People Act (1969): voting age in UK lowered to 18
  • Scottish Elections (Reduction of Voting Age) Act (2016): voting age for Scottish elections lowered to 16
49
Q

Outline the basic history of the suffragists and suffragettes.

A
  • Parliament denies petition to give women the right to vote 1866
  • The suffragists are created as a lobbying group headed by Fawcett - open to all, democratic and using peaceful means to lobby the government to give women the vote, ultimately successful in 1928
  • Some women, specifically Pankhurst and her daughters, grow impatient with the seemingly milquetoast efforts and create the suffragettes - a woman-only movement that uses violent means to intimidate the government which was disbanded upon women over 30 gaining the vote in 1918
50
Q

[Essay] How does disenfranchisement increase likelihood of reoffence?

A

Person loses the right to vote + traumatic experience of imprisonment ~> person feels alien to society ~> Person is thrust back into society ~> person is more likely to reoffend because it’s all they know
- Cohen (1972): master status
- Centre for Criminal Justice Studies: giving prisoners the vote sends the message that they are still members of society

51
Q

[Essay] How do prisoners lose the right to vote?

A

Violate social boundaries ~> require rehabilitation, punishment, or separation ~> deemed unsuitable to decide the course of society ~> no vote
- 1884 US supreme court: “one rendered infamous by conviction of felony is unfit for the privilege of suffrage.”

52
Q

[Essay] How does disenfranchisement act as a deterrent?

A

Right realists (like Reagan and Thatcher) argue that criminals make a cost-benefits calculation when committing a crime, so increasing the cost (disenfranchisement) will decrease crime - also known as target hardening since this approach has been taken, crime has been going down.

Criminals make a rational cost-benefit calculation when committing a crime ~> increasing the cost (disenfranchisement) ~> people are less likely to commit crime
- Right realists: Rational-Choice theory
- Target hardening reduced crime since the Thathcer era

53
Q

[Essay] How isn’t disenfranchisement a deterrent?

A
  • Crime only started going down after the 90’s when it peaked, target hardening had nothing to do with it.
  • No it doesn’t: all prisoners can vote in Finland and its criminality score is almost half the UK’s (3 V 5.75)
  • With increasing inequality (top 20% making 7x as much as bottom 20%), more people are resorting to crime as a means or solving relative depravation
54
Q

[Essay] How do prisoners deserve the vote?

A

It is a fundamental human right to be able to vote ~> the UK is violating human rights by refusing ~> the UK violates moral and international law and weakens the legitimacy of Government rule
- ECHR ruling on Hirst V UK: UK is violating Article 21 of the ECHR
- Starmer at the European political Community 2024: “I would never leave the ECHR.”

55
Q

[Essay] How does prisoner enfranchisement harm democracy?

A

People don’t care or want prisoners to have the vote ~> democracy means people get what they want ~> prisoners shouldn’t get the vote because it would harm democracy
- YouGov 2012: 63% of people don’t want any prisoners to have the vote
On the other hand: Burke’s Trustee/Delegate model

56
Q

What are the three key features of pressure groups?

A
  • External: attempt to influence government policy from outside (Suffragettes and force feeding)
  • Narrow: focus on specific issues (Dad Shift and push for greater paternity leave)
  • Unity: united by a specific shared belief so can work with other ideologies (Civil Rights Movement)
57
Q

Outline the purpose distinction between pressure groups.

A
  • Interest: represent the interests of a specific section of society: Trade Union Congress brings together 48 unions of more than 5.5 million workers to lobby for worker’s rights
  • Cause: represent certain values or beliefs not specific to one group: Child Poverty Action Group
58
Q

Outline the relationship distinction between pressure groups.

A
  • Insider: groups that are regularly consulted by the government and use that influence rather than direct action or civil disobedience: National Farmer’s Union £1 million programme to help dairy exports
  • Outsider: groups that are kept or choose to stay outside the circle of government and attempt to influence via mass media and protest politics: BLM and the arrest of Thomas Lane, murder of George Floyd
59
Q

Why might a pressure group be outsider?

A
  • They are denied insider status and are forced to ‘go public’ to indirectly influence policy: Dad shift
  • They choose to operate as outsiders due to their radical goals and worries of being ‘domesticated’: Just Stop Oil
60
Q

[Essay] Why should insider pressure groups work with ministers?

A

Ministers need specialist knowledge ~> they go to pressure groups ~> pressure group has direct influence over government policy that is most likely to get through
- ASH and Sunak’s progressive smoking ban

61
Q

[Essay] Why shouldn’t insider pressure groups work with ministers?

A

You need the government to have complete power to pass the policy, not always true and recently less so
- May’s 9 seat minority and the loss of influence of the IEA
However, Johnson’s 80 seats and Starmer’s 85 seats may have restored it

62
Q

[Essay] Why should insider pressure groups work with Parliament

A

Smaller majorities or minority government ~> diminished power in Parliament ~> lobby Parliament overall ~> Wider reach + influence government and opposition simultaneously
- BLM in 2020 and Johnson creating the Commission of Race and Ethnic Disparities investigate and suggest solutions for inequity
- The National Autistic Society’s ‘I Exist’ campaign convincing many MPs for Gillian’s Autism Act 2009
- In 2022-23, only 43% of government bills passed

63
Q

[Essay] Why shouldn’t insider pressure groups work with Parliament?

A

Government gains strong majority ~> lose Parliament power + may become associated with certain parties

Doesn’t work if you government has strong party line
- Best for Britain and the failure to get a second referendum (Johnson’s 21)

64
Q

[Essay] Why should insider pressure groups work with political parties?

A

Political parties are in Parliament + more likely to have consistent ideologies ~> have constant ear of group in Parliament
- The Liberal Reform group has embedded itself in the LibDem party
- Greensill’s use of Cameron to lobby the Conservatives for more funding

65
Q

[Essay] Why shouldn’t insider pressure groups work with Political Parties?

A

Party doesn’t achieve significant power ~> No power to bring policy
- Liberal Reform Group has had little power to affect economic policy given LibDems have hovered around 80 seats

Getting too close to one party can alienate others and discourage them from our policies as they are seen as those of another party
- Trade Unions, worker’s rights and Labour

66
Q

[Essay] Why should outsider pressure groups work engage in orderly protests?

A

Orderly protests legitimise the movement
- The Civil Rights Movement and the March on Washington

The aim to present their goals as the ‘will of the people’ and make the government worry about electoral loss
- The marches and walkouts for Palestine and Labour’s humanitarian pause becoming a ceasefire

67
Q

[Essay] Why shouldn’t outsider pressure groups work engage in orderly protests?

A

A persistent and widely popular government may not have to worry
- Iraq, Stop the War (1 million) and Blair still getting a 31 seat majority

May only be ably to present as the will of the people if large membership
- Just Stop Oil has less than 100 members

68
Q

[Essay] Why should outsider pressure groups work engage in civil disobedience?

A

More media attention = more people drawn to your cause + more discussion of your goals
- Extinction Rebellion held its first protests in October 2018 and opened 140 chapters the following November

Violence can get even more media attention and make people worry about growing societal disorder
- Suffragettes and 3000 bombings and arsons

69
Q

[Essay] Why shouldn’t outsider pressure groups work engage in civil disobedience?

A

Low level disruption may be characterised as ‘childish rebellion’ without real political goals
- Just Stop Oil and Stonehenge orange spray paint

  • Violence inevitable leads to condemnation and subverts the political system which is based on one’s ability to convince other people
  • “We do not negotiate with terrorists.”
70
Q

What are the 5 factors affecting the success of a pressure group?

A
  • Wealth
  • Size
  • Organisation and leadership
  • Compatibility with government
  • Popular support
71
Q

Give an argument and counterargument for the importance of wealth to pressure group success.

A

Wealthy groups often hold sway within systems so the government have to listen to them - Unite (second largest union) successfully lobbied the 2020 government to help workers amid the pandemic
They can also use their wealth to employ full-time lobbyists whereas less wealthy groups have to rely on part-time volunteers - 8/10 of the most frequent lobbyists are from corporations in the FTSE 100 index

  • This is backwards thinking, pressure groups gain wealth because they are successful
  • Wealth matters less in an era of instant news, when reach is relatively cheap - 24% of social media users reported using the #BLM
  • Parties need public support to side with wealthy campaigners - 2021, conservative government announced 25% increase to corporation tax after pandemic.
72
Q

Give an argument and counterargument for the importance of size to pressure group success.

A

Large groups can claim to represent the public opinion so governments are more likely to listen to them - the National Student Union has 6 mill members and in 2012, successfully lobbied for greater bursaries
Larger membership means larger protests which gain greater media spectacle and awareness - Stop the War and 1 million Iraq protests

  • Specialist expertise may outweigh size - the Howard League was quoted by the media 500 times in one day for its criticism of the government building more prisons despite only having 19 staff
  • If sectional, density may matter more - BMA has 80% of doctors at 200,000
73
Q

Give an argument and counterargument for the importance of organisation and leadership to pressure group success.

A

A good leader can make a group’s actions more precise and accurate - MLK acted as a moral religious bridge to white Christian America
They may also have good contacts and a high media profile - Marcus Rashford acted as a big media liason for the Child Food Poverty Task Force

  • Great organisation doesn’t really mean anything if the government remains stagnant - 6 5-day strikes by BMA in protest of a new contract for junior doctors, including the first general strike in NHS history fell apart in November 2016 after the government refused to quit
74
Q

Give an argument and counterargument for the importance of compatibility with government to pressure group success.

A

In the end, governments are much more likely to push policy if the agree with it - Blair, Iraq, and Stop the War; NSPCC, ‘flaw in the law’ campaign and amending the law to include online grooming

  • Even if they can’t change the policy in the short-term, they may be able to change public values in the long-term - one of the aims of Stonewall is to increase acceptance of queer genders and sexualities in their mission statment
  • Gaining enough public support may force the government’s hand - The marches and walkouts for Palestine and Labour’s humanitarian pause becoming a ceasefire
75
Q

Give an argument and counterargument for importance of popular support to pressure group success.

A

Governments make a calculation of electoral loss if they refuse a demand, if you have the will of the people, they are more likely to listen - Rashford’s ability to gain support for extending FSM to the summer holidays forced Johnson to U-turn in 2021

  • This doesn’t always mean they’ll listen - BMA and 2016 protests
  • Other means of getting the government’s ear may be better - insider groups like the IEA have small support but strong power, especially under May
76
Q

Do Pressure Groups Promote Democracy?
Supplementing democracy Vs. Holding unaccountable power

A

Parties want more votes ~> appeal to larger groups ~> smaller groups go unrepresented due to lack of electoral promise ~> turn to pressure groups to get their interests and beliefs into the mainstream via protest and lobby - ‘Dad shift’ and the baby protest, BLM and the use of the internet

  • Pressure groups are private ogranisations with private decision makings and finances ~> PGs are unnaccountable to the public so can commit action damaging public health without reprucussions ~> undermine democracy - Just Stop Oil and Stonehenge (history), BLM riots (public safety and economy)
77
Q

Do Pressure Groups Promote Democracy?
Widening participation Vs. Narrowing Participation

A

Traditional forms on decline ~> Participation needed to enhance democracy ~> PGs give alternative methods that appeal to people that feel representative democracy has failed them - Use of Haka in NZ Parliament to protest bill

  • The most powerful groups tend to be those that are already powerful, those with money, popularity, etc. - 8/10 of the most frequent lobbyists are from corporations in the FTSE 100 index
78
Q

Do Pressure Groups Promote Democracy?
Widening power Vs. Narrowing power

A

No group can maintain power longer than they are of interest and competing groups provide political consumers with a constant variety of ideological choice - The Tobacco Institute was heavily influential before 1997 but ASH has become more so since (Sunak’s progressive smoking ban)

  • Sectional interests may mean damage towards wider society - Groups like the Taxpayer’s Alliance lobby for lower taxes which means lower public spending and worse public services
79
Q

Define a think tank and give left/centre/right-wing examples.

A

A body of experts brought together to discuss certain topics and find solutions to certain issues
- Left: the Fabian Society, prominent in helping create Social Democracy
- Centre: Centre for Social Justice, helped develop universal credit
- Right: The Institute of Economic Affairs, especially prominent under May and Truss

80
Q

Give an argument for and against the positivity of think tanks.

A

Think tanks provide expert knowledge, discussion and debate of issues and can speak more freely without worrying about appearances - the Fabian Society drew many influential figures like H. G. Wells and E. Pankhurst

  • Many argue that think tanks only promote the interests of their wealthy funders, disregarding the efficacy of their reccomendations - roughly 50% of the IEA’s funding, who promote tax cuts and lower public spending) comes from individuals or large businesses
81
Q

Outline a lobbyist and give an example.

A

Organisations or groups that sell their expertise in political processes to those who want political influence.
- Greensill payed Cameron £720,000 a year to lobby the minister he once knew to join a scheme called the Corporate Covid Financing Facility

82
Q

Give an argument for and against the positivity of lobbyists.

A

Lobbying is part of democracy and allows people, especially those who often go ignored, to have their interests heard - in 2012, lobbyists worked with the Association of Convenience Stores to convince 80 MPs to exempt local newsagents from a new law on keeping tobacco behind shutters.

  • Lobbyists concentrate knowledge of efficent lobbying into the hands of those who can afford them, effectively stripping power from groups that aren’t rich enough and promoting the interests of the wealthy - the lobbyists in the previous example were funded by British American Tobacco (£64b) to circumvent laws inhibiting them from directly lobbying MPs.
83
Q

What are human rights?

A

The absolute, fundamental and inalienable entitlements we recieve that the government has a responsibility to protect and uphold.

84
Q

Outline positive and negative rights.

A

Postive: rights that require action to be realised
- Right to public education requires government action

Negative: rights that require inaction to be realised
- Right to life is naturally upheld unless otherwise negated

85
Q

What are the 9 most important legal devellopments of citizens rights in the UK?

A
  • 1215: Magna Carta; imposed restictions on the power of the monarch
  • 1689: Bill of Rights; Parliamentary soveriegnty and the rights of parliament over the monarch
  • 1807: Slave Trade Act; abolished British slavery
  • 1953: ECHR; government action has to comply with ECHR
  • 1973: ECJ; ECJ now has the power to protect workers’ rights
  • 1984: Data Protection Act; established protections surrounding personal information held by public institutions
  • 1998: Human Rights Act; codified the ECHR and allowed it to be brought to UK courts
  • 2000: FOIA; ensured political transparency
  • 2010: Equality Act; consolidated and codified all anti-discriminatory measures
86
Q

What were the three key aims of HRA 1998?

A
  • Bringing rights home: allowed Brits to challenge human rights abuses in the UK without funds to go to the ECtHR
  • Creating a culture of respect for human rights: placed legal duty on almost all public bodies to uphold human rights
  • Increasing public awareness of human rights: by placing everything in one document, made easier to understand and utilise
87
Q

Give two examples of the Human Rights Act in action.

A
  • The HRA underpinned the 1998 Good Friday Agreement
  • In 2022, local police failed to protect a woman’s right to life when they did not respond to her 999 call and had to settle with the woman’s family
88
Q

Give three arguments for the HRA as effectively protecting rights and liberties, giving examples.

A

Right are now enshrined in statute law
- No longer ignorable due to international law
Legislation has to comply with the HRA
- Rwanda scheme
Citizens can access rights portection via UK-based courts
- Hillsborough case 1989

89
Q

Give three arguments against the HRA as effectively protecting rights and liberties, giving examples.

A

Can be circumvented by Parliament
- The Safety of Rwanda Act 2024
Trojan horse for EU rights
- UK needs a ‘British Bill fo Rights’
Can be set aside by government in crisis
- The Derogation of the rights of terror suspects afetr 9/11

90
Q
A