Types Of Firms Flashcards
Why do some firms remain small and how can this be overcome
Size market is small - operating in a specialist segment of market, low demand = remains small
Limited access to finance - small firms r high risks to banks ; unwilling to lend - BUT CROWDFUNDING (collecting small amount of capital from large group of indvs to finance a new business)
Owner objective to retain control of business - unwilling to expand
Lack of economies of scale = no incentive to grow if no cost savings - BUT CONCENTRATE ON NICHE MARKETS - specialised where there is less competition = more profitable (low comp and more price-elastic demand)
Indv personalised services - offer personal service, customers wish to deal with particular person
Why do some firms grow
Benefit from economies of scale - large firms have lower costs of output in LR
Increase market share - large firms have more power market = control prices + retain customer loyalty. Threat of competitors reduced.
Reduce to risk - produce range of products (diversify), benefitting from economies of scope - less risk to being forced out of business if demand falls
Meet managerial objectives - pay + bonuses of managers related to sales revenue.
State Principal- agent problem
When aims of the principals (shareholders) and agents (managers) diverge and conflict with each other.
Shareholders own most large businesses ( appoint managers to control business)
Shareholders maximise profits (dividends) and managers may have diff motives (increase sales and expense of profits)
Horizontal integration and adv and dis
When firms merge at the same stage of the same production process - may not have the same products but want to increase range of products
Adv
- gain economies of scale (exploiting internal EOS = lower LRAC = increased profitability)
- Increase market share by reducing competition + removing/ taking over key rivals = increased pricing power (can increase prices to increase profit margins - monopoly power)
Dis
- risk of attracting scrutiny from competition authorities/ regulators which may be worried the merger = decreased competition = decreased consumer welfare
- diseconomies of scale from enlarged businesses grown beyond optimum level from cost point of view
- workers might lose their job if roles in new form are duplicated
- workers may have
- some assets may be sold off - wasteful
Vertical integration
Firm merge at different stages of production process - broken down into 2 further types; backwards and forwards integration
Backward = firm merged with a supplier
Forward = buying another firm in same production process but closer to customer
Conglomerate integration (diversification)
Adv + dis
Firm buys another firm in a completely unrelated business - firm diversifies
Adv
- spreads risk, profitable areas cross subsidies loss-making areas
- diff products success at diff parts of business
- brands gain more recognition
Dis
- lack of expertise on new areas
- brands May become diluted
- differences in cultured = conflict + low productivity
Constraints on business growth
Gov regulation - ensure markets remain competitive + prevent dev of monopolies
Capacity constraints - May have insufficient machinery to expand, shortage of finance for expansion
Market constraints - limited demand, indv tastes have to be satisfied, large scale prod inappropriate
Vision constraints - owner’s attitude - family business + avoid taking on people from outside, easier to manage
State of economy - recession = demand limited, no point expanding
Reasons for de mergers
focus on core business = decreased costs (AC) = increases profit margins (cost savings) + increase returns to stakeholders
- Avoid diseconomies of scale and scope (due to large scale organisation) by decreasing range of functions in a firm = achieve lower management costs
Meet demands of regulators
economic impacts of demergers
producers - greater efficiency by becoming more specialised/ focused than before = lower costs improve profit margins
BUT - demerger may reduce the demand for the resulting company - reduction in rev may reduce overall profits
consumers - lower prices since more focused company reduce costs and pass onto consumers via lower prices - greater comp also pushes prices down
BUT - loss of economies of scale may INCREASE producer costs = higher prices for consumers