gov intervention Flashcards
what is state provision
the direct provision of goods + services by the gov free at the point of comsuption
what do we assume about state provision
government has full knowledge of SC and SB (knowing all externalities and the socially optimum level)
- therefore is used to to solve underproduction/ underproduction issues AND solve inequity issues due to universal access (p=0)
- solve missing market issues = reach socially opt level and reach rev max and allocative efficiency
major issues of state provision
excess demands (p=0)
- Qd is further than Qs
- prices cannot rise to ration out excess demand due to universal access
- for example in healthcare patients are treated based on the severity of their conditions determines when you get treatment - therefore live in pain if conditions not considered serious enough
- gov may say to services to deal with excess demands like having large queues and waiting rooms, lots of children in classrooms (burden of excess demand)
- people may consider to go into privatisation of that service (maybe government intervenes to provide this) in order to alleviate pressure
huge costs
- cuts to other areas og gov spending
- opportunity cost
- LR funding
asymmetric information - don’t actually know the socially opt level - means Qd may not be at appropriate level = market failure (overdoing allocation of resources/ too low will lead to worsening of excess demand)
INEFFICIENCY - lack a profit motive
- costs tend to be much higher (OPP COST)
examples of regulatory bodies
ORR (railway regulators)
OFCOM (telecommunications)
what is the aim of competition authorities
to ensure the public interest in being protected
the role of regulation/ competition authorities
prevent excessive pricing
promote competition
ensure quality, standards, choice
promote innovation (profits being used for consumer benefit)
regulate natural monopolies (privatisation is effective)
when might regulation take place?
collusion/ cartel agreements
investigate mergers
liberalise highly concentrated markets
what is privatisation
when state run (gov run) organisations are sold off to the private sector
- due to private sector having a profit motive, efficiency gains are increased
- higher competition is allowed in the market, decreasing costs and leading to further increased in efficiency
- moving towards the competitive levels of output and price levels (Pm to Pc and Qm to Qc) producing to where AR=AC
benefits of privatisation
allocative efficiency - due to increased competition there is an increased efficiency, more motive to produce at higher qualities = greater consumer satisfaction
decreased X inefficiency - reduction in waste, decreasing costs and maximising profits)
Dynamic efficiency gains do to profit motive, this allows for reinvestment in the LR - decreases prices in the LR and benefit consumers (improved innovation and lower prices)
negatives of privatisation
flocking of firms into the market may lead to limited competition - this leads to allocative inefficiency (firms may not strive to produce at the best quality since there is limited comp) and productive inefficiency (not produce at the lowest point on the AC curve)
due to profit motive - there may not want to be the want to run loss making firms however there is high demand from consumers which may cause issues
what is nationalisation
process of taking an industry into public ownership (run by the gov)
benefits of nationalisation
greater EOS - productive efficiency gains lead to lower AC and therefore lower prices for consumers
- focus on service provision, meaning the needs and wants of the consumers are met, allowing allocative efficiency, maximising CS
- less likely to be market failure arising from externalities since social opt levels are being maximised, minimising overall oveprod/consump = AE gains
negatives of nationalisation
risks of diseconomies of scale if firm/ company grows too large, exceeding opt levels
(communication, coordination)
- there are a LACK of incentives (due to lack of profit motives) for state runs to minimise costs = wasteful production creeps in = X-inefficiency
- lack of supernormal profits = Dynamic inefficiency - not able to reinvest into innovation and R+D = reduces benefits to consumers and their satisfaction in LR
evaluations for nationalisation
funding vs delivery
- there are huge costs tax payers have to share burden as a result of nationalisation but if society benefits from better delivery of public service rather than private service then this is overall positive
if there is strong regulation, there will be no need to fully nationalise a market/ service and thus reduces the risks/ impacts this has on society/ firms - alternative
what are the ways in which gov intervention can promote competition + contestability
deregulation
privatisation
competitive tendering