types of conformity and explanations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define conformity

A

yielding to group pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who proposed the 3 types of conformity?

A

Kelman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 3 types of conformity?

A
  • internalisation
  • compliance
  • identification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is internalisation?

A
  • making the beliefs, values, attitudes and behaviours of the group your own
  • an individual’s change of view is permanent
  • private and public acceptance of groups opinion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is an example of internalisation?

A

e.g. being brought up in a religious household, and becoming religious yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is compliance?

A
  • going along with others ideas/views to gain approval/avoid disapproval of the group
  • publicly agreeing but privately disagreeing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is an example of compliance?

A

e.g. when friends pressure you into drinking alcohol when you don’t truly want to, and will not drink outside of such social situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is identification?

A
  • adjusting behaviour and opinion to the group, because we identify with the group, and so want to be part of it
  • publicly changing our behaviour, often temporary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is an example of identification?

A

e.g. acting more professional and less silly when you arrive at your
office to work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the strongest type of conformity?

A

internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the weakest type of conformity?

A

compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the 2 explanations for conformity?

A
  • normative social influence
  • informational social influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is normative social influence?

A
  • we conform because we want to be liked or respected by the group
  • based on the desire to fit in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is an example of normative social influence?

A

e.g. a person starting to smoke because they are surrounded by other people who smoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is informational social influence?

A
  • when someone conforms because they want to be right, so they look to others by copying or obeying them, to have the right answer in a situation
  • based on the desire to be right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is an example of informational social influence?

A

e.g. a person following the direction of the crowd in an emergency, even though they don’t actually know where they are going, as they assume that everyone else is going to the right place

17
Q

what research is an example of normative social influence?

A

Perkins

18
Q

outline Perkins’ findings

A

adolescents who were told that most of their peers did not smoke, were less likely to start smoking themselves

19
Q

what research is an example of informational social influence?

A

Fein

20
Q

outline Fein’s findings

A
  • asked ppt’s to vote for a US presidential candidate after they saw
    others voting for somebody else.
  • most of the ppt’s changed their mind because they wanted to be ‘correct’, thus demonstrating the impact of informational social influence as a mechanism for conformity.
21
Q

evaluation: research support for informational

A

ID: there is evidence to support the role of informational social influence
Q: this comes from research by Lucas et al, who gave students easy and difficult maths questions.
EX: for example, Lucas et al. found that conformity to an obviously incorrect maths answer was greater when the question was more difficult and the participant rated their own maths ability unfavourably
AN: this shows that individuals are more likely to turn to others when they lack the information to make
their own informed decisions i.e. in an ambiguous situation, increasing the reliability of the explanation

22
Q

evaluation: research support for informational + ELAB

A

ID: there is evidence to support the role of normative social influence
Q: the research support comes from Asch
EX: Asch found evidence of normative social influence, as ppt’s claimed if they gave the correct answer, they risked being ridiculed by the group, as they didn’t want to be the odd one out. furthermore, Asch found that when answers were written down, conformity dropped to 12.5%
AN: this is a strength as the research shows that ppt’s were conforming with the desire to fit in with the group, increasing the reliability of the explanation
ELAB: there is further research to support normative social influence
EX: for example, Perkins found that adolescents exposed to the simple message that the majority of their age peers did not smoke were subsequently less likely to take up smoking.
AN: this shows how people shape their behaviour out of a desire to fit in with their reference group

23
Q

evaluation: two-process model may be oversimplified

A

ID: as the 2 explanations are seen to be independent, they can be criticised for being oversimplified
Q: NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard’s ‘Two Process Model
EX: for example, a dissenting confederate can provide social support, reducing the effect of NSI through providing the ppt with a supporting, similar view. equally,
this can also reduce the effect of ISI through the confederate providing the ppt with an alternative source of information
AN: this means that it may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms. this reduces the credibility of the explanation because we are unsure of ISI and NSI operating independently or together