explanations for obedience - social psych, situational, dispositional Flashcards
what are the 3 explanations for obedience?
- social psych explanations
- situational explanations
- dispositional explanations
what are the 2 social psych expl for obedience
- agentic state
- legitimacy of authority
what is agentic state?
- this is when a person believes that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions.
- when a person shifts from an autonomous state (the state in which a person believes they will take responsibility for their own actions) to the agentic state, it is called an agentic shift.
how does an agentic state lead to obedience?
agency theory is the idea that people are more likely to obey when they are in the agentic state as they do not believe they will suffer the consequences of those actions.
this is because they believe that they are acting on behalf of their agent.
what is legitimacy of authority?
- we obey because we feel obligated to, we accept people’s credentials and believe they know what they’re doing
- ingrained in us to obey these people, even when we believe it may be unethical
- uniform and location demonstrates legitimate authority (teacher/police)
what are the 3 situational factors?
- location
- uniform
- proximity
how does location lead to obedience?
a person is more likely to obey someone in a location linked to higher status and legitimacy
give an example of obedience due to location (milgram)
Milgram’s study was conducted at a prestigious American university (Yale), and so obedience was greater than in a variation of the study, conducted in a rundown office
how does uniform lead to obedience?
a person is more likely to obey someone wearing a uniform as it gives them a higher status and a greater sense of legitimacy
give an example of obedience due to uniform (milgram)
it was found that obedience was much higher when the experimenter wore a lab coat as opposed to normal clothes
how does proximity lead to obedience?
a person is more likely to obey when they are less able to see the negative consequences of their actions and are in closer proximity to the authority figure. this is because it
increases the pressure to obey and decreases the pressure to resist.
give an example of obedience due to proximity (milgram)
in Milgram’s study, obedience was higher when the experimenter was in the same room (62.5%) as the ppt, as opposed to being in a different room and speaking over the phone i.e. the
remote instruction condition (20.5% obedience levels)
evaluation legitimacy of authority: research support (Tarnow)
ID: a strength of legitimacy of authority as an exp for obedience, is that it has research support
Q: Tarnow looked at aircraft accidents in the USA, where flight crew actions were the contributing factors
EX: for example, there was an excessive dependency on the captain’s authority in over 1/2 of the accidents. one officer claimed he didn’t question the captain’s behaviour because he assumed the captain knew what he was doing
AN: this supports legitimacy of authority as it highlights how the captain’s authority overruled responsibility, due to his status. increasing the external validity of the explanation
evaluation agentic state: conflicting evidence
ID: a dispositional explanation may be a better reasoning for obedience
Q: Rank and Jacobson found conflicting research when studying agentic state in nurses
EX: for example, they found that 16/18 nurses disobeyed orders from a doctor to give an excessive dose of a known drug.
AN: this is a weakness as agentic state/shift cannot explain all situations, reducing external validity
evaluation uniform: research support (Bickman)
ID: there is research to support the situational variable of uniform
Q: Bickman conducted research to test uniform as an explanation for obedience
EX: for example, he found that the public were more likely to obey someone and pick up litter, when an actor was dressed as a security guard, rather than a milkman or in normal clothes
AN: this is a strength as the research increases the ecological validity of uniform as a situational variable, and the credibility