Types of attachment Flashcards
What is a secure attachment
Where there is a strong positive relationship between infant and caregiver
What is an insecure attachment
Where there is a weak emotional relationship between child and caregiver
Why are some children insecurely attached
- differences in maternal sensitivity
- temperament
- chuldren that are maltreated
Wartner et al (1994)
- Observed that securely attached children showed more competance in their play
- Children are able to comfidentialy expolore their environment whilst using their PCG as a base
- 82% of children at the age of 18 months and 6 years remained in the same category of attachment
Belsky and Fearon (2002)
Securely attached children had greater social confidence, school readiness, expressive language and receptive language
What are the 3 types of attachment identified by Ainsworth
Secure, insecure anxious avoidant, insecure anxious resistant
Signs of a secure attachment
- distress on separation
- pleasure on reunion
- seeks comfort
- reacts differently with PCG and stranger
Signs of insecure anxious resistant
- infant is insecure in the presence of mother/PCG
- distress on separation
- infant resists contact from PCG on return and is wary of stranger
Signs of insecure anxious avoidant
- infant does not seek contact from PCG
- shows little distress on separation
- avoids contact with PCG on reunion
- infant treats PCG and stranger the same
Ainsworth et al (1978) strange situation aim
Investigate individual variation in infant attachments. How children react under conditions of stress and to a new situation
Ainsworth et al (1978) strange situation method
- in a controlled observation, 12-18 month old infants were in a room with their mother
- 8 different scenarious occurred, including being approached by a stranger, the infant being left alone, and the mother returning
- the infant’s reactions were observed
Ainsworth et al (1978) strange situation results
- 15% were insecure avoidant (type A)- they ignore the mother and didn’t mind if she left. A stranger could comfort them
- 70% were securely attached (type B)- they were content with mother, upset when she left, happy when she returned. Avoided strangers
- 15% were insecure resistant (type C)- unea with their mother, upset when she left, reisisted strangers, hard to comfort when mother returned
Ainsworth et al (1978) strange situation conclusion
Infants showing different reactions to their carers have different types of attachment
Ainsworth et al (1978) strange situation evaluation-strengths
- controlled observation-reliable results
- 100 infants-good sample size
- supports Maccoby’s key attachment behaviours
Ainsworth et al (1978) strange situation evaluation-weaknesses
- lab study-artificial-reduces ecological validity
- parents may have hanged behaviour as they knew they were being observed-could have had effect on children’s behaviour
- mother may have not been the child’s main attachment figure
- child put under stress-ethical issue
- Main and Soloman (1986)- suggested a 4th attachment type
- demand characteristics
- ethnocentric-American so culturally biased and reflects one’s norms and values