Cultural variations Flashcards
What are cross cultural variations
These refer to the fact that behaviour, attitudes, norms and values differ across cultures-becaused cultures socially construct different values and norms
What does individualistic mean
This emphasises individually, individual needs and independence
What does collectivist mean
This is where the individuals share tasks, belongings and income
How does Britain view insecure avoidant attachments, compared to Germany
Britan=negatively because it is associated with weak attachments
Germany=positively because it is associated with being independent
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) aim
- to investigate the cross-cultural variation in attachment types, through a meta-analysis (data from several studies)
- only use findings from studies that had used the strange situation
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) procedure
- meta analysis of 32 studies that had used the strange situation to measure and classify the relationship between mother and infant
- research from 8 different nations was compared e.g. Japan, Sweden etc
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) findings
-there was one and a half times greater variation within cultures than between them
-considerable consistency in the distribution of
attachment types was found across cultures
-secure attachment was the most common
-western cultures dominant insecure type was avoidant
-non-western cultures was resistant
-China had equal numbers of avoidant and resistant types
-Highest proportion of insecure avoidant was Germany
-Highest proportion of insecure resistant was Japan
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) conclusion
- there are greater variations in attachment types among different groups in society
- the greater variations found within cultures suggests that a sub cultural comparison would have been more valid
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) evaluation
- children are brought up different ways in different cultures-this might result in different types of attachment in different cultures. The Strange Situation might not have been a suitable method for studying cross cultural attachment
- the study assumes that different countires are the same thing as different cultures
- meta anaglyses can hide individual results that show as unusual trend
- it does not tell us why patterns of attachment vary within a culture
Grossman et al (1985)
claimed that more ‘avoidant’ infants may be found in Germany because of the value Germans put on independence - so ‘avoidance’ is seen as good