Tumour immunology and immune escape Flashcards
How does the immune system know what to kill and leave alone?
The model we use is discrimination of self and non-self through recognition of sugars, proteins, glycosylation patterns, PAMPS
If tumour cells are self, does the immune system recognise cancer?
Tumour cells are self
And yet…
Transplantable tumours in mice showed that a tumour specific immune response can be generated
Mice can be vaccinated against a tumour, therefore showing that the immune system can recognise cancer
Explain how the experiment by Shankaren et al (2001) showed the implication of the immune system and CD8+ T cells in eliminating tumours
RAG2-/- = mice have no way of generating antigen receptors = no lymphocytes therefore no adaptive response
Gave mice methylcolanthine, 80 days after drug given, KO mice start to have tumour, this means that the adaprive immune reponse is dealing with tumours and killing them normally
They also found that almost all tumour cells were killed by CD8+ T cells, with a small contribution from NK cells
What do the TCRs of T cells recognise infected and maligant cells through?
major histocompatibility molecules (MHC) on antigen presenting cells (APCs)
Surface and secreted molecules on CD4 vs CD8 cells
Surface: same (ab TCR, CD3), different, CD4 and CD8
Secreted:
CD4: IFNy, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-10
CD8: Perorin, granzyme, IFNy
Features of MHC i
Present endogenous antigens (intracellular, internal)
Display self proteins, virus proteins, intracellular pathogens
Present antigen to cytotoxic T cells (CD8)
Features of MHC II
Found primarily on Antigen presenting cells (APCs) – DENDRITIC CELLS, B cells, macrophages
Present exogenous antigens (extracellular, external)
Phagocytosis, receptor mediate endocytosis
Present antigen to helper T cells (CD4)
What 2 signals does a T cell need
1 = antigen
2= co-stimulation from an APC
Features of NK cells
Can kill infected or tumour cells without priming
Release large amounts of IFN-γ
Have an activatibg receptor and an inhibatory ones
Activating ligands could be:
Stress molecules
Caspases from dying cells
Inhibitory ligans are:
MHC (attach to KIR receptor or NKG2A (CD94)
Explain how NK cells make decisions based on the balance of activating and inhibitory signals
NO ATTACK:
- no MHC I moleculs, no activating ligand
- MHC I molecules, no activating ligand
ATTACK:
No MHCI molecule, Activating ligands
BALANCE:
If there is a balance of both present
What molecule forms a pore to allow granzymes to kill?
Perforin
Smyth 2000
pfp-/- mice lack perforin
p53+/- mice more susceptible to tumours
Mice that lack porferin only have about 40% with no lymphoma
next:
wild type B6 mice
B6.pfp-/- = lack perforin
B6 + aThy1 = lack T cells
B6 + aNK1.1 = lack NK T cells
B6 + aCD8 = lack CD8 T cells
Low cell numbers do not cause tumours
Mice lacking perforin, T cells and CD8 T cells rapidly develop tumours
KO T cells (white ovals)
RW
Experiment highlighting the importance of T cells and NK cells
Shankaren 2001
WT 20% sarcomas
RAG2-/- = mice have no way of generating antigen receptors = no lymphocytes (60%)
IFNGR-/- = mice cannot respond to IFNy release (60%)
STAT1-/- = STAT1 mice cannot respond to inflammation (55%)
RkSk – both RAG2 and STAT1 knocked out (15% incease in mice with sarcomas) likly due to NK cells, showing these also contibute
What are tumour antigens also known as
Altered self
How can tumour antigens/altered self occur?
if tumour is triggered via a virus (Oncogenic virus ) e.g. HPV
Differences in epigenetic silencing within a tumour cell
Mutations generally that make a different peptide
These are all very specific so are easier to treat with drugs
Gene over-expression, can be seen by T cells, but more difficult to treat
Tumour specific gene expression – T cells may be able to sense this but again difficult
For a tumour antigen to develop
The mutation needs to be generated, through structural or epigenetic mutations
The mutation needs to be translated to protein
The peptide needs to be generated by the proteosome and pass into the ER
The peptide needs to be bound by an MHC class I molecule
The peptide/MHC complex needs to initiate a robust response in a T cell
Mutated antigens
The first identified mouse tumour antigen was cloned in 1988.
The antigen was a complex between a mutated peptide (one amino acid altered ) and the MHC class I molecule. The wt peptide did not bind well to MHC.
Allowed CD8 T cells to recognize and kill cells expressing the mutated but not the wildtype peptide
Overexpressed antigens in tumour cells lead to…
Some tumour antigens are not unique to the tumour but are hugely overexpressed compared to healthy tissue. This is a danger signal for the T cells and for antibody recognition. BUT these antigens are not unique to the tumour and so that makes them very difficult to target
Germline antigens
Sometimes antigens are expressed in tumours but not in normal adult tissues – so there is no immune tolerance to that antigen established. E.g. gene switched on in the tumour cell which is normally only expressed in sperm, which do not have MHC and cannot therefore present it to T cells – so T cells do not normally see that antigen
These antigens are therefore tumour-specific but are not mutated
Viral oncoproteins
About 15% of tumours are triggered by viruses (e.g. cervical cancer / papilloma viruses). Viral peptides will be presented by MHC on the surface of the cells they invade. These are obviously non-self and trigger an immune response from the CD8 T cells.
Differences in testing in mice vs humans
Mice:
We use genetically identical mice
We only use a few, very in-bred mouse strains
Cell lines:
We use a few tumour cell lines
They are often extremely mutated after years in culture
We inject at millions / mouse
As we move forward in cancer biology it may become better to test in humans first, this is not the case currently
What would you refer to lymphocytes in a tumour as
TILs (tumour infiltrating lymphocytes)
Are TILs important in humans?
One way of telling if T cells have important anti-cancer roles in patients is seeing if patients on immunosuppressive therapies have increased cancer risk
Or if patients with inherited immunodeficiencies have increased cancer risk
Large population databases are required for this sort of work
Van Leeuwen 2010:
Do patients with kidney transplants have more cases of cancer? And due to being on immunosuppressive drugs
Also had group where transplant failed and went back to dialysis - this is a good control group that once had immunosuppressive drugs but now don’t
Also split cancers they looked at into cancers triggered by infections and ones that weren’t
On immunosuppressive drugs you are 100% more likely to develop lip cancer, drops back to normal ones off, but there are many cancers that this wasn’t the case, showing that T cells are important in some cases