Trusts & Estates Flashcards
Will Formation: Essay Intro
A testator creates a valid formal will when there is (1) a testator with formal capacity, (2) present testamentary intent (3) to sign (4) a writing (5) in the joint presences of two witnesses who understand the intsrument is a will.
Will Formation: Capacity Paragraph
A testator has capacity when they are (1) 18 years old, (2) understand the extent of her property, (3) the testator knows the natural objects of their bounty (who will receive their property), and (4) knows the nature of their acts.
Here, testator [is/not] 18 yo because… They [do/do not] understand the extent of their property because ….They [do/do not] understand the nature of their bounty because… They [do/do not] know the nature of their act because…
Thus, the testator [does/not have] capacity.
Will formation: present testamentary intent paragraph
A testator has testamentary intent when they sign an interest and understand they are executing a will.
Here, testator [did/did not] sign an interest because … and [does/does not] understand they are executing a will because…
Thus, there [is/is not] present testamentary intent.
Will formation: signed paragraph
The testator or someone in their presence and direction must sign the will.
Here, testator [did/did not] sign the will because…
Thus, the will [is/is not] signed.
Will formation: writing paragraph
The entire will must be in writing.
The entire will [is/is not] in writing because…
Will formation: in the presence of two witnesses who understand the instrument is a will.
A formal will must be signed in the joint presence of and attested to by two witnesses at the same time. Two witnesses must be aware the instrument is a will and be of sufficient mental capacity to understand that they are witnessing a will being executed.
Here, the will [was/was not] signed in the joint presence of and attested to by two joint witnesses at the same time because… The two witnesses [were/were not] aware the instrument was a will and [did/did not] have the capacity to understand they were witnessing a will because…
Thus, this element [is/is not] satisfied.
Will formation: presumption of fraud, duress, or undue influence paragraph
If a witness has an interest in the will property, a court will presume the witness procured the devise by fraud, duress, or undue influence.
Here [witness] has an interested in the will property because….
Thus, the court will presume there has been fraud, duress, or undue influence and [witness] will have to rebut that presumption.
Will formation: substantial compliance doctrine
If a will was not properly witnessed, a court will treat the will as duly formed when the proponent of the will establishes, by clear and convincing evidence, that at the time the tester signed the will, they intended the document to constitute her will.
Here, there [is/is not] clear and convincing evidence that, at the time testator signed the will, they intended it to be their will because…
Thus, the substantial compliance doctrine [will/will not] save the will from the witness defect.
Components of a will: integration
When a testator physically attaches documents to a will or the components of a will are internally consistent with the additional documents, it creates a presumption that the pages were present at time of execution and intended to be part of the will when it was executed.
Components of a will: will alteration
Alterations made on the face of the will, including strikeouts, interlineation, or deletions, after a will is signed and attested are ineffective to change the will unless the will is re-executed with the proper formalities or the changes qualify as a holographic codicil.
Components of a will: Codicil
A codicil modifies a previously executed will and must itself be executed with the same formalities. When a testator executes a codicil, the will is treated as having been executed on the same day as the codicil.
Components of a will: incorporation by reference: BY WRITING
A document that is not integrated into a will is incorporated by reference and becomes part of the will when
(1) the document existed at the time the will was executed,
(2) the document is sufficiently described by the will,
(3) the document provides satisfactory proof that the proffered document is the document described in the will, and
(4) the testator intended to incorporate the document into the will.
Contesting a will
A will contest challenges the validity of the will. Grounds for contesting are defective execution, lack of testamentary intent, revocation, incapacity, undue influence, fraud, or mistake.
Intestate distribution: community property
A surviving spouse inherits all of the decedent’s community property. A surviving spouse receives decedent’s half of quasi-community property.
Intestate distribution: per capita
In a per capita jurisdiction, whenever issue taken by intestacy, or if a will or trust provides for issue to take without specifying the manner, they take per capita, equally in their own right. Issue of the same degree take equally in their own right. Issue of more remote degree take per capita by representation.
Intestate distribution: per stripes
In a per stripes jurisdiction, distributions are made at the first level, even if everyone is dead, so long as they left issue. The the issue take as the predeceased ancestor would.
Intestate distribution: adopted children
Adopted children are treated as a natural child of the adopting parent and severs the relationship between the child and his or her natural parents. However, the relationship is not severed between the child and his or her natural parents when the child is adopted by the spouse of the natural parent.
Intestate distribution: step-children & foster children
Stepchildren and foster children are treated as an adopted child if (1) the relationship began during the child’s minority, (2) continued through the parties’ lifetimes, and (3) it is established by clear and convincing evidence that the stepparent or foster parent would have adopted but for some legal barrier.
Intestate distribution: Non-marital children
Martial status of parents is irrelevant; rather, a court will focus on whether a parent-child relationship existed, irrespective of marital status.
Trust Formation Paragraph
A valid trust requires intent, res, a valid purpose, a trustee, and a beneficiary. There is intent when the truster manifests unequivocal intent to create a trust. There is res when there is identifiable property. A trust purpose is valid when it is legal and not against public policy. A trust must have a trustee. A trustee is a person designated to administer the trust. If one is not named, the court may appoint a trustee. A beneficiary is someone who has an interest in the trust. A trust must have a beneficiary to enforce the trust.
Here, there [is/is not] intent because… There [is/is not] res because… there [is/is not] a valid purpose because… there [is/is not] a trustee because… there [is/is not] a valid beneficiary because…
Thus, a vlid trust [was/was not] formed.
Types of trust: Charitable trust
A charitable trust confers a substantial benefit upon society. A charitable trust must have a stated charitable purpose.
Here, there is a state charitable trust purpose because…
Types of trust: charitable trust: modification/CY PRES
A court may modify a charitable trust through the cy pres power or when the settlor does not foresee circumstances and a deviation from the original trust terms is needed to preserve the trust. The Cy Pres doctrine applies when the settlor creates a trust that is impossible carry out, and the court can either (a) create a resulting trust or (b) apply cy pres. Under the doctrine of cy press, a court finds the settler had a general charitable intent and modifies the mechanism to carry out the settlor’s intent.
Here, the trust [is/is not] impossible to carry out because…