Agency and Partnerships Flashcards
Creation of an agency relationship
Definition – Agency is a fiduciary relationship, where a person or entity (the agent) acts on behalf of another (the principal).
Elements – An agency relationship exists if there is:
1) Assent – a formal or informal agreement;
2) Benefit – the conduct primarily benefits the principal; AND
3) Control – the principal has the right to control the agent (control doesn’t need to be significant).
*The characterization of the relationship by the parties is irrelevant.
Types of agency relationships
Universal Agent – has broad authority, authorized for ALL acts the principal can
perform.
− General Agent – has authority to conduct a series of transactions over a period of time.
− Special Agent – has limited authority either for a specific act/transaction OR a specified period of time.
Termination of agency relationship (MEDI)
An agency relationship terminates by:
a) A manifestation by either party that the relationship is terminated;
b) Expiration of a specified term of authority;
c) Death of principal or agent (by operation of law);
OR
d) Incapacity of the principal or agent (by operation of law) – except if a durable power of
attorney exists
Death of Principa
Common Law → agency is terminated regardless of whether the third-party has notice of principal’s death.
Some States → NOT terminated until the third-party has notice of the death.
Agency contracts
Agency Contracts – Principal can terminate the agent at any time.
− BUT, principal may be liable for damages if agent is terminated prior to the expiration of a contract (unless the agent materially breached contract).
Actual authority
A principal is bound to a contract entered into by its agent if the agent had actual authority.
Two Types – occurs if:
Express Authority → by principal’s explicit directions to the agent (either orally or in writing).
Implied Authority → either:
a) Action is necessary to carry out the agent’s express authorized duties;
b) Agent acted similarly in prior dealings with the principal; OR
c) It’s customary for an agent in that position (silence/acquiescence can give rise to a
reasonable belief of authority in the future).
An agent has actual authority when acting within their reasonable understanding of authority, even if
Apparent authority
A principal is bound to a contract entered into by its agent if the agent had apparent
authority.
Apparent Authority exists when:
1) A third-party reasonably believes the agent has authority to act on behalf of the principal;
AND
2) That belief is traceable from the principal’s manifestations (principal holds the agent out as having authority).
A principal holds an agent out as having authority if:
principal:
a) gives a position or title indicating authority;
b) previously held the agent out and did not publish a revocation; OR
c) cloaked the agent with the appearance of authority.
*Continues until the principal communicates termination to third-parties.
Apparent authority is not applicable if:
Apparent Authority is NOT applicable if:
a) the third-party had knowledge that the agent did not have actual authority; OR
b) the transaction was not within the ordinary usages of business.
Unidentified/partially disclosed principal
Apparent Authority CAN exist.
Undisclosed principal
Apparent Authority CANNOT exist.
Ratification
Makes the principal liable for an agent’s contract entered into without authority.
Ratification occurs when the Principal:
1) Has knowledge of all material facts or contract terms; AND
2) Assents (approves) to the same through words or conduct.
*Agent also remains liable if principal was not disclosed.
Rest. 2nd → Undisclosed principal CANNOT ratify.
Rest. 3rd → Undisclosed principal CAN ratify
Agent’s contractual liability
Generally, an agent has NO liability if they:
1) Fully disclose the principal to a third-party; AND
2) Have actual or apparent authority.
Agent will be liable if both elements above are not met.
Agent may seek Indemnification from a principal if:
1) agent is liable; AND
2) his conduct was authorized.
Employee v. independent contractor
Primary focus is whether the principal had the right to control the manner and method in which the job was performed.
Factors → courts analyze the following to determine if a person is an employee or independent contractor:
1) type of work;
2) pay (hourly vs. per project);
3) who supplied the equipment/tools;
4) degree of supervision;
5) degree of skill required;
6) if the work benefits the employer’s business;
7) extent of principal’s control over work details;
8) whether agent/contractor is engaged in a distinct business;
9) length of time employed/engaged;
10) characterization & belief of relationship; and
11) whether agent was hired for a business purpose.
Respondeat superior doctrine
An employer is liable for an employee’s negligent acts if the employee was acting within the scope of the employment.
Employee acts within Scope of Employment when:
a) Performing work assigned by the employer; OR
b) Engaging in a course of conduct subject to the employer’s control.
Time place purpose test
To determine the scope of employment, courts analyze whether the conduct:
i) Is of the kind the employee is employed to perform;
ii) Occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits; and
iii) Is motivated (in whole or part) to serve the employer.
Respondeat superior: intentional torts
are generally outside the scope.
EXCEPTIONS:
a) Act was specifically authorized by employer;
b) Act was driven by a desire to serve employer; OR
c) Act was the result of naturally occurring friction from the type of employment.
Not within the scope of employment
Conduct is NOT within the scope if it’s unrelated and not intended to serve any purpose of the employer.
− BUT see exception below.
Liability for independant contractors
Generally, an employer/principal has NO liability for an Independent Contractor’s torts.
Exceptions:
1) Inherently Dangerous Activities.
2) Non-delegable duty owed by principal.
3) Estoppel – the principal holds out the contractor as his agent, third-party reasonably relied on contractor’s skill, and the third-party suffered harm.
Duties owed by agent to the principal
1) Duty of Care → duty to use reasonable care when performing agent’s duties.
2) Duty of Loyalty → duty to act solely and loyally for the principal’s benefit.
3) Duty of Obedience → duty to obey all reasonable directions of the principal.
UPA
Uniform Partnership Act
RUPA
Revised Uniform Partnership Act
ULPA
Uniform Limited Partnership Act