Trusts Flashcards
What are the 5 principal characteristics of a trust?
- Trust property
- A trustee
- A duty
- Objects
- An equitable proprietary interest
What are 2 qualities of a beneficiary?
-Rights correlative to trustee’s duties and can enforce those duties
-An equitable proprietary interest in the trust property
A beneficiary has equitable proprietary interest in trust property. What does this allow them to do?
-Enforce interest against everyone except equity’s darling (i.e., 3rd party buys asset with due consideration + did not know that it was on trust)
-Claim an interest in the traceable proceeds of trust property
What is the difference between a contract and a trust?
-Result of agreement between parties (which owe obligations to each other) vs no need for agreement between parties (obligations from T to B)
What is the difference between debtor-creditor relationships and trusts?
-Debt does not relate to specific assets/funds vs duty relating to specific property
-Personal right to repayment vs equitable proprietary interest
-A bank is not a trustee of money deposited by its customers
What is the difference between agency and trusts?
-Agent can commit a principle to a contract with a 3rd party vs a trustee cannot commit B to contract with a 3rd party
(Note: both are s.t. fiduciary duties)
What is the difference between bailment and trusts?
-Subject matter: tangible personal property vs anything
-Bailor is not legal owner
What is the difference between administration of estates and trusts?
-Time: as quickly as possible vs potentially many years
-Interests of rights: personal right against executor relating to proper administration of estate vs B has equitable proprietary interest
What are the 2 methods of creating an express trust?
-Self declaration of trust
-Transfer on trust
When is constitution required?
Transfer on trust: transfer legal title to trustee
What is required for all express trusts (x3)? What is additional required for inter vivos express trusts (x2) and testamentary express trusts (x1)?
All:
1. Certainties
2. Beneficiaries / permitted purpose
3. Compliance with applicable perpetuity rule
Inter vivos express trust:
-Transfer on trust: constitution
-Trust of land: manifested and provided by some writing signed by some person who can declare such trust or by his will
Testamentary express trust:
-s9 Wills Act
What is required (in general) for an enforceable trust of land? What is the exception?
- Written +
- Signed by someone who can declare trust (usually settlor; arguably trustee) or declared by will (i.e., satisfies s9)
Exception: resulting, constructive and statutory trusts?
What happens if s53(1)(b) (regarding formalities for declaring trust of land) is not complied with?
Trust is unenforceable (not void): B cannot enforce their rights (note: once enforceable, Bs can enforce their rights in respect of period between declaration and satisfaction)
How does the rule in Saunders v Vautier work for multiple beneficiaries?
- Adult Bs (with full mental capacity) who exhaust all possible claims on a trust fund can collectively terminate the trust
- Where Bs exhaust all possible claims on part of a trust fund, they can terminate the trust in relation to that part (e.g., fixed trust in equal shares)
(Note: look for gift-over)
Can beneficiaries with contingent interests exercise S v V rights?
Yes, if they act together with all other persons who share the beneficial interest in the property, incl. objects of any gift-over
What are the 3 certainties?
- Intention
- Subject matter
- Objects
What is the requisite intention for certainty of intention?
Intention to assume duty to hold or apply property for beneficiaries
Certainty of intention: how can intention be ascertained? What are some relevant factors?
- Words: imperative; word ‘trust’ is not determinative
- Conduct: segregate funds in a separate bank account which has been earmarked for particular person/purpose; treat sole bank account as joint
What approach is taken to ascertain intention?
Objective approach: if they manifest an intention to impose/ assume the duty which is characteristic of a trust, they intend to create a trust (irrelevant that they do not actually (i.e., subjectively) intend to create a trust or are unaware that they even exist)
What are the 2 requirements for certainty of subject matter?
- Trust property requirement
- Beneficial entitlement requirement
What are the 2 main problems with the trust property requirement?
- Identifying subject matter by description: cannot create trust of ‘bulk’ or ‘net assets’
- Identifying subject matter out of a larger mass
Are fractional interests acceptable for the trust property requirement?
Yes, if wider mass of assets has been clearly identified
Which is the only combination of tangible & fungible that will produce valid trust property?
Intangible & fungible (e.g., trust over same type of shares)
What are examples of void trusts where subject matter is identified as a specific number of a larger mass?
Tangible & fungible: 20 out of 100 bottles of wine; 1 out of 5 1kg bars of gold
Tangible & non-fungible: trust over diamonds
How is the beneficial entitlement requirement assessed?
Must be possible to ascertain nature and extent of B’s interest in the trust property
Objective test: e.g., ‘reasonable income’ is an ‘objective yardstick’
What test is used to determine certainty of objects for a fixed trust where there are multiple beneficiaries?
Complete list test: must be possible to draw up a complete list of all beneficiaries
1. Conceptual certainty (defining the objects e.g., class)
2. Evidential certainty (whether person meets that definition)
What happens if identifiable beneficiaries have a beneficial entitlement which is not dependent upon entitlement of uncertain beneficiaries?
Identifiable Bs can still take their interest: does not fail completely (e.g., trust to settlor’s wife for life, remainder to their ‘favourite daughter’)
How is certainty of objects assessed for discretionary trusts and powers of appointment? What extra factor needs to be considered for discretionary trusts?
Is/is not test:
1. Conceptual certainty is required: need to be able to define trust objects (e.g., employees, children and relatives are all conceptually certain)
2. Evidential certainty: some uncertainty allowed - for C to prove to trustees’ satisfaction that they are with the class; need 1 person to fit requirement
Administrative unworkability
What is meant by administrative unworkability?
Administrative unworkability: void if class of beneficiaries is so hopelessly wide as not to form anything like a class (e.g., residents of Greater London or West Yorkshire)
What are the 2 requirements of a Quistclose trust?
- Money is paid for a purpose (instead of at recipient’s free disposal)
- Mutual intention that money could only be applied for the purpose and not at free disposal of borrower
What is constitution?
The transfer of legal title from one party to another
What do constitution rules apply to?
- A transfer on trust (and NOT self-declaration of trust): requires legal title in property to be vested in trustees
- Gift: requires transfer of legal title from donor to donee
How does constitution take place for a testamentary trust?
Via the will: after testator’s death, PRs must obtain legal title to testator’s estate, and then ensure that legal title is transferred
How should legal title of registered land be transferred correctly?
- By deed
- Registered with Land Registry
How should legal title of shares in a private company be transferred correctly?
- Transferor signs stock transfer form
- Stock transfer form sent to company
How is legal title of a chose in action transferred correctly?
Notice in writing to debtor/ bank
How is legal title of chattels transferred correctly?
- Deed of gift; or
- Delivery of chattel with evidence of transferor’s intention to transfer it
How is legal title of cheques in favour of transferor transferred correctly?
Transferred to a 3rd party by transferor endorsing the cheque by signing their name on the back
What happens if disponer fails to comply with formalities?
Gift/trust was imperfect –> need to consider whether equity has perfected it. If it does not, trust is void (and potentially on resulting trust)
What are the 4 exceptions to the general rule that equity does not perfect an imperfect gift/trust?
a. Re Rose
b. Unconscionability principle
c. Strong v Bird: fortuitous vesting
d. DMC
What is required to perfect an imperfect gift/trust using Re Rose?
(i) Transferor completes transfer form in correct form
(ii) Transferor gives completed transfer form and any supporting doc(s) to transferee or 3rd party (NOT agent) who can perfect the transfer (‘beyond their control’)
What is required to perfect an imperfect gift/trust under the unconscionability principle?
Circumstances would make it unconscionable for donor to change their mind e.g.
-Made gift in own free will
-Told transferee about gift and that transferee need take no further action
-Transferee believes gift is there
-Transferor intends to transfer
What is required to perfect an imperfect gift/trust using fortuitous vesting (3 elements)
i. Donor intended to make an immediate gift (relates to existing, not future property)
ii. Donor’s intention to make gift continued until their death (i.e., does not change mind)
iii. Donee appointed PR of donor’s estate
What is required to perfect an imperfect gift/trust using DMC (3 elements)?
i. Donor contemplates their death in the future from an identified and (believed) imminent cause
ii. Gift is conditional on their death (i.e., donor intends gift to be fully effective only if they die, and to be revocable until then)
iii. Donor gives donee dominion (control) over subject matter of gift: hands it, or something representing title (not just possession), to donee
What is required for donor to part ‘dominion’ of property for chattels and (constructively) houses
-Chattels: delivery (with intention)
-Houses (via constructive delivery): title deeds via keys to steel box which contained the deeds (keys to house were insufficient)
What can donee do if all requirements of a valid DMC are present?
Request that the donor’s PRs then complete transfer of legal title to them
How does perpetuity work for charitable trusts?
Can last indefinitely:
-Property held on charitable trust: must vest in the charity within 125 years
-Capital which vests in charitable trust: will continue to be held, and can be used for these purposes unless the property runs out
What is the cy-pres doctrine?
Allows trust property to be applied for other charitable purposes even if the specific trust fails
How is certainty of purpose assessed for charitable trusts?
Sufficient that there is intention to apply property for a charitable purpose (much more flexible than private trusts): if there is uncertainty as to how this intention is to be carried out, trustees can direct that the property be applied for such charitable purposes as they select
What are the 12 charitable heads?
- Provision/relief of poverty
- Advancement of education
- Advancement of religion
- Advancement of health or the saving of lives
- Advancement of citizenship or community development
- Advancement of the arts, culture, heritage or science
- Advancement of amateur sport
- Advancement of human rights, conflict resolution or reconciliation or the promotion of religious or racial harmony or equality and diversity
- Advancement of environmental protection / improvement
- Relief of those in need because of youth, age, ill-health, disability, financial hardship or other disadvantage
- Advancement of animal welfare
- Promotion of efficiency of armed forces, police, fire or ambulance services
What are the 3 requirements of a charitable purpose trust?
- For a charitable purpose
- Wholly and exclusively charitable
- Satisfy a public benefit test
What is required to satisfy a public benefit test?
a. Identifiable public benefit
b. (Sufficient section of) the public
What is considered when determining whether there is an identifiable public benefit? (x2)
- Balance benefit against any detriment/harm arising from purpose
- Benefit must be capable of being identified and described even if it cannot be quantified/measured
What test is used to determine whether a charitable trust is for the benefit of (a sufficient section of) the public? (2 parts)
i. Not numerically negligible
ii. Not defined by a personal nexus (i.e., not defined by dependency on relationship to a particular individual)
When is the rule relaxed for the public benefit test?
Prevention or relief of poverty: can have pools of beneficiaries where there is a personal connection to the settlor + restrict to smaller geographical area
However: purpose must still be for benefit of a particular description of poor persons, not to the benefit of particular poor persons
Can charities charge for services?
-Yes (and can even make a profit if this is reasonable and necessary to carry out charity’s aims)
-Limitation: opportunity to benefit must not be unreasonably restricted
Can charities pursue political objectives?
No: cannot have a political purpose (although can use political means to achieve a non-political objective)
What is required for the charitable head of ‘the prevention or relief of poverty’?
-‘Going short’ (does not mean destitution
-Must not benefit the rich
-Can be inferred
What is unique about ‘prevention or relief of poverty’ head?
Can go to a specific individual
What could be counted within the ‘advancement of education’ charitable head?
-Educational value (to research)
-Directed to lead to something which will pass into the store of educational material
-Improves sum of communicable knowledge
-Support of learning
-Ancillary organisations
What is required for the charitable head ‘the advancement of religion’ (2 steps)
- It is a religion
- The trust positively ‘advances’ the religion i.e., promotes it, spreads its message, take some positive steps to sustain and increase religious belief
What is required for charitable head of ‘arts, culture, heritage or science’
Arts: of ‘merit’ (may need expert evidence)
Monuments: of cultural/ historical importance
Heritage: part of country’s local/ national history and traditions
What cannot happen for charitable head ‘the advancement of human rights’
Stray into political objectives (e.g., seeking to procure changes to the law)
What does the charitable head ‘the advancement of animal welfare’ include?
-Providing for welfare of particular types of animal)
-Improving slaughtering methods
(Excludes care of particular animals)
What happens if a trust has a mixture of charitable and non-charitable purposes? What is the basic rule and what are the 2 exceptions?
Basic rule: void (–> returns to seller on resulting trust), unless non-charitable purpose falls within a recognised category of non-charitable purpose trust
Exception 1: non-charitable bit is ‘incidental or subsidiary’
Exception 2: can separate and allocate separate funds
Cy-pres doctrine: what is the difference between initial and subsequent failure?
Initial failure: property cannot be applied to the specific purpose from the beginning
Subsequent failure: property has been given to charity
When can trust property be applied cy-pres? Why does the distinction between initial and subsequent failure matter here?
Initial failure: intention to give effect to a general mode of charity (and NOT if there is a specific intention to benefit a particular object - this would normally go on resulting trust)
Subsequent failure (given impossible to go back on resulting trust)
What are the 5 requirements for a valid non-charitable purpose trust?
- Fall within an Endacott exception
- Sufficiently certain (i.e., purpose must be certain): stricter than charitable purpose trusts
- Comply with perpetuity rules: rule against inalienability
- Testamentary only: trust is created in a will
(5. Dependent on willing trustee to carry out terms of trust: not required for trust to be valid)
What are the Endacott exceptions?
- Trust for maintenance of particular animals
- Trust for erection and maintenance of monuments and graves
- Trust for the saying or private mass
What is the perpetuity rule for non-charitable purpose trusts?
Rule against inalienability: 21 years (+ life in being)
Applied strictly (no ‘wait and see’ rule) –> should always include express perpetuity clause (21 years, and only start running at death of a named person), otherwise void for perpetuity
What happens if there is no willing trustee to carry out terms of trust?
Testator’s residuary legatees (who would otherwise receive the property) can sue to enforce the undertaking and prevent a misapplication of the fund
When does the rule against remoteness of vesting apply?
People or charities as objects
What is the rule against remoteness of vesting?
A person (or charity) must obtained a vested interest in trust property within 125 years
Any interest under a trust which does not vest within the statutory perpetuity period is void (resulting trust for settlor or their estate)
What is the ‘wait and see’ rule regarding rule against remoteness of vesting?
Trust can subsist until it becomes apparent that the interest cannot vest within the perpetuity period - anything done before this will remain valid
What is the class closing rule regarding the rule against remoteness of vesting?
Can save a trust by excluding objects who might otherwise cause the trust to fail because their interest would vest outside the perpetuity period
Perpetuity: what happens if a trustee holds property on trust for A (aged 2) for life, the remainder to be divided equally between A’s children and grandchildren?
-A the date the trust is created, only A has a vested interest in the trust property (and only in the income)
-When A dies, any of their children/ grandchildren who have already been born will have vested interests; however, there may be grandchildren yet to be born
-Fixed trust in equal shares –> trustee cannot divide the property between objects until they are all ascertainable
-Close closing rules will apply: limits class of beneficiaries to A’s children and grandchildren, if any, who are alive at the end of the perpetuity period
When does an automatic resulting trust arise?
There has been some sort of failure in the creation of a transfer on trust: transfer on trust wholly/ partially fails, but the property has been transferred to the trustee
What is the effect of an automatic resulting trust?
Effectively, returns beneficial interest to the settlor, giving them S v V rights and thus the ability to collapse the trust and (1) retain the property or (2) re-attempt the intended express trust
What are 5 examples of resulting trusts arising (3 for initial failure; 2 for subsequent failure)
Initial failure: property has been transferred to B, intending to hold on trust, but fails for uncertainty of objects, subject matter or beneficiary principle
Subsequent failure:
-Some trust property has still not vested in B after 125-year statutory perpetuity period
-Purpose of a non-charitable trust can no longer be carried out, but there are funds remaining
What are some examples of a resulting trust NOT arising?
-Fails due to lack of constitution
-Self-declaration / testamentary trust which fails for uncertainty of objects/subject matter: will have no effect / void
What happens if property is left to an individual in a will, and it is concluded that there is insufficient certainty as to whether they are intended to be a trustee?
Gift to that individual
What are the 2 ways in which presumed resulting trusts (purchase money resulting trusts) can arise?
- Gratuitous transfer + no evidence that transferor intended recipient to receive the property as a gift (presumption can be rebutted by evidence that transferor/ contributor’s actual intention is inconsistent with creation of trust)
- Person pays all/part of purchase price for a new asset and no evidence that the transferor intended recipient to receive property as gift (or B provided consideration)
What happens if A purchases shares and has them registered in B’s name?
B will hold the shares on resulting trust for A unless it can be shown that this was not A’s intention
What happens if A and B each contribute 1/2 of purchase price for land and B is registered as sole legal owner; no evidence that A intends a gift to B; no express trust is declared
B holds the land on trust for A and B as TiCs in equal shares
A contributes 70% and B contributes 30% of purchase price; they are registered as joint legal owners; they do not discuss how the property should be shared and no express trust is declared
A and B hold the land as legal JTs on trust for A and B as equitable TiCs - A has a 70% equitable share and B a 30% equitable share
If there are joint legal owners of a house, how is the equitable interest presumed to be held (without an enforceable express trust)?
Equitable JTs
Joint legal owners (of family house): how can C rebut the presumption?
i. C establishes that the parties had a common intention that their interests should be other than joint (express/inferred intention only)
ii. C demonstrates that they acted to their detriment in reliance on their common intention
Can intention be imputed to determine whether C establishes that the parties had common intention that their interests should be other than joint?
No: can only have expressed or inferred intention
Joint legal owners: is it easy to rebut presumption of equitable joint tenancy?
No: heavy burden requiring unusual facts to adduce relevant evidence to rebut presumption
Joint legal owners: what factors are considered when analysing the whole course of conduct with regard to establishing common intention of interests being other than joint? (i.e., Stack factors)
-Advice/discussions the parties had which may indicate their intention
-Purpose for which the parties acquired the house
-Nature of relationship
-Children?
-How house was financed
-How parties arranged other finances and divided responsibility for household expenses
CICT: if C rebuts the presumption, what are the 3 ways in which the size of C’s share of the equitable interest is determined?
- Expressed common intention as to respective shares
- In absence of (1), is the court able to infer their common intention as to their shares?
- In absence of (1) or (2), court will impute an intention for ‘fair shares’ based on the whole course of conduct
What is presumed where there is a sole legal owner?
Legal owner is sole beneficial owner?