Tropical Conservation - new cards & studies Flashcards
L—— et al. 201- - Most forests have already been…
Laurence et al., 2014 logged / modified globally
What trees are taken in selective logging in the tropics?
The large, marketable trees
Edwards et al. 2011 looks at how logging can change species composition
What area of the world is looked at?
How do dung beetle and bird populations compare in primary vs degraded forests?
What are the implications for policy-makers?
Edwards et al. 2011
Looks at primary vs logged and twice logged forests in South East Asia
Tackled the assumption that secondary forests are much less valuable for nature
Looks at birds and dung beetles
75% of bird species persist in secondary logged forests
Logging caused an initial decline in dung beetles. But had no significant effect on species richness in birds
Degraded forests should be protected by policy-makers and conservationists
——– & —- 1997 . They look at tree injuries and death in RIL compared with CNV
How much less damage can be done with RIL?
What techniques should be employed to reduce damage?
What forms of damage did CNV commonly result in?
Bertault & Sist 1997: Non-target species being injured or killed as well as less skidding damage from vehicles. Other studies also support this.
Compares pre and post-harvest inventories in RIL and CNV
CNV has more unintended tree injuries and deaths, including tree death via uprooting from skidding and crown damage via non-precise felling techniques
Therefore, tree damage via logging can be reduced by 20% via vigorous planning and logging supervision, as well as a limit on harvest intensity
Edwards et al. 2—-: What area is looked at? What is found out about land sparing vs land sharing and for what taxa?
What is controlled for in the study?
2014,
Looks at Borneo again
Looks at species abundance and species richness of birds, dung beetles and ants under land sparing vs land sharing approached>
Land sharing: Timber extraction and biodiversity concessions along boundaries
Land sparing: Intensive timber extraction and intact primary rainforests
Controls for timber yield across both
Higher abundances and consequently richness for all studies taxa along land-sparing initiatives
Give the negatives (3) and positive/no loss effects (2) of logging on biodiversity
Negatives:
Changes species composition
Some species apparently extinct in landscape
Logging is harmful, re-logging magnifies harm
Positives:
Substantial amount of biodiversity persists
Includes Red-listed species (e.g. orang utan)
G—- et al. 20-1 does a meta analysis to show which uses of converted forests are most detrimental. A——-, b—– and p——- come out worst.
Gibson et al., 2011. Agriculture, burning and plantations
What groups found to do best in terms of abundance under land sparing?
Birds, dung beetles and ants seemed to do best in terms of abundance under land sparing
Cutting lianas can also increase t—– production and f—- production - Cerullo and E—– 2019
Cerullo & Edwards 2019: timber, fruit
what are roads important for?
Giving access to remote areas, cheap labour, and cheaper land clearance. Roads have doubled in size since 2003
What study reinforces that road construction may facilitate further clearance
Laurance et al. 2009 - 95% of deforestation within 1km of a road
W— et al. 201-: Created study of a fake road with just noise. What was learnt? What did further lab-based studies suggest this meant for the community?
Ware et al. 2015: 31% of birds avoided road, and birds that stayed had lower body condition.
Uses speakers to replicated just the sound of a road and investigate it’s impact on songbird communities during autumn migration
Found that 31% of bird community avoided the roads, and that those that remained had a significantly lower body condition
Further lab-based experiments suggested that this may be down to the foraging-vigilance trade-offs, with noise reducing the suitability of otherwise suitable habitats
L——– et al. 2004 - did all bird species suffer from roads?
Laurence et al. 2004. No.Depended on niche. Edge loving / canopy bird species liked it, and terrestrial / solitary understory birds very much did not. Laurance et al. also found that some bird species would NOT cross roads thus becoming isolated
What is the problem with mitigation methods for road planning? Give a citation - Ry——- et al. 2015
Rytwinski et al. 2015.
Often poorly tested and greenwashy. Need to test how many of these structures, if they work, where to put them etc.
M——- i——– and r——— can potentially help with management of p——- forests - managing p—— forests is the key issue
market incentives, regulations, primary
Give the 3 main ways to reduce biodiversity losses in logging
- Reduced Impact Logging
- Lower Intensity Logging
- Land sharing vs land-sparing logging
Note: Sooo RIL and LIL are quite similar. I guess the subtle difference is LIL refers to reducing harvest size and RIL refers to practices to reduce environmental harm of logging. Is subtle though.
In RIL, you identify h——– species, p——- species and mature ‘s—’ species
harvestable, protected, seed
Give some pre-harvest preperations you’d do in RIL
You then do your pre-harvest preparation where you plan roads to minimise damage, keeping them straight, narrow and to the target trees. You also centralise your log dumps to mimimise dumping, and cut vines so they don’t drag down other trees.
why have some studied (Burivalova et al. 2014) found bird species to increase with logging intensity. Ie- what reason is given for their persistence
Birds species richness can INCREASE with logging intensity, perhaps due to more edge-tolerant species coming in.
Bic—— et al. 2014 looks at impact of RIL on multiple taxa.
What taxa?
How does RIL change species abundance and composition?
What implications does this have for conservation?
Reports on the impact of RIL on many taxa: Birds, bats and large mammals over a period of 5 years
Assemblages showed very little effect to impact of RIL - structure and composition of species remained very similar
Therefore, study DOES support previously little-proven assumption that RIL is much better for biodiversity
Overall impact of RIL described as relatively benign, thus furhter widespread use could make valuable contribution to conservation reserves.
Explain this quote by giving examples of how roads can alter habitats:
Roads cause physical, chemical, structural, environmental and biological impacts on the adjacent habitat.
Roads cause physical (I.e. waterflow changes), chemical (ie. Chemicals from construction leaching out) , structural (ie. Fragmentation), environmental (temperature changes) and biological (Mortality and fragmentation) impacts on the adjacent habitat.
What pollution can roads lead to?
Noise, vibrations, chemical run off into the soil air or water
“Smaller partially isolated populations at greater risk of extinction due to deterministic processes” - Give examples of some of these deterministic processes
limiting a critical resource (food, shelter or space)
Random demographic changes
Random environmental changes
What are some Things which could be done to mitigate the impact of roads (3) ?
- Reduce road widths to improve connectivity
- Maintain large, roadless areas with intact habitats
- Direct roads toareas with yield gas & low biodiversity
- Direct carbon markets (REDD+) to countries with areas of conflict for these things
Klienscroth et al. 2019 Looks at road expansion in central Africa using Landsat imagery, and the number of new and abandoned roads, as well as their impact on deforestation.
What do they find?
What are the implications for conservation?
Annual deforestation rates within 1km of roads found to have increased markedly, being highest for the oldest roads and lowest for the new roads.
Higher road abandonment rates have partially lessened impact of roads on deforestation, but increase in roads is still of great concern for carbon sequestration, habitat loss and hunting rates.
Road decommissioning after logging could play a vital role in reducing negative impacts of timber extraction on forest ecosystems. There is call for those with road building concessions to collaborate effectively with governments, local communities and international funders to engage in effective environmental planning.