TriNav Clinical Evidence Flashcards
Compared to Traditional Microcatheter, PEDD Achieved what % Increase in ORR? (Response)
23% Increase
Compared to Traditional Microcatheter, PEDD Achieved what % Increase in More on target distribution? (Accuracy)
34% More on Target
Compared to Traditional Microcatheter, PEDD Achieved what mean %? (Saftey)
Mean 58%
Compared to Traditional Microcatheter, PEDD Achieved what % Increase in pathological response? (Response)
55% Increased Pathological Response
Compared to Traditional Microcatheter, PEDD Achieved what % Increase in tumor dose? (Response)
23% Increase in tumor dose
d’Abadie Study
Compared to Traditional Microcatheter, PEDD Achieved what % Increase to T:N (Accuracy)
24% Increase in T:N
Who authored the clinical summary showing a 23% increase in ORR (Response)
Titano, JJ.
Who authored the clinical summary showing a 34% more on target distribution? (Accuracy)
Titano, JJ.
Who authored the clinical summary showing a mean of 58% decrease in non-target embolization? (Protection)
Pasciak, AS.
Who authored the clinical summary showing a 23% Increase in tumor dose? (Response)
d’Abadie, P.
Who authored this paper showing these results?
Penetration
Improved particle penetration with PEDD using same sized particles in similar sized vessels
Safety
Helps protect against non-target delivery.
100% vs 72%
Embolization efficiency, PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p<0.05)
Arepally, A
Who authored this paper showing these results?
Penetration
68% (range: 33% - 90%)
Increase in tumor deposition, PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p<0.05)
Accuracy
100%
Improved T:N ratio in all study patients
Safety
Mean 58% (range: 24% - 89%)
Decrease in non-target embolization, PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p<0.05)
Pasciak, AS
Who authored this paper showing these results?
Penetration
23%
Increase in tumor dose, PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p<0.001)
Accuracy
24%
Increase in T:N, PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p<0.001)
d’Abadie, P.
Who authored this paper showing these results?
Imaging Response
100% vs 77%
23% Increase ORR/Imaging
PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p=0.019)
Pathologic Response
89% vs 34%
55% Increased Pathological Response
PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p=0.026)
Accuracy
89% vs 55%
34% More on-target
Particles in tumor, PEDD vs. Traditional Microcatheter (p=0.002)
Titano, JJ.
The existing body of PEDD data demonstrating improvement vs. traditional microcatheters has been validated, expanded and enhanced by
Real World Evidence (RWE)
What data has shown that, TriNav is used to treat complex patients and achieves the same or better results than when less sick patients are treated with EH
Real World Evidence (RWE)
(RWE) Matched cohort analyses of TARE patients with HCC and with CRC liver metastases revealed what?
A. TriNav HCC patients received more liver transplants than non-TriNav patients post-procedure
B. TriNav patients had fewer 30-day inpatient visits than non-TriNav patients post-procedure
C. TriNav CRCLM patients had fewer overall clinical complications than non-TriNav patients post-procedure
D. All of the above
D. All of the Above
