Traits: Cross-Situational Consistency Flashcards
Trait-State Theory: One important feature of the factorial approach to taxonomy is that it includes the notion of ……….
Aggregation
A level one act is a temporary…… - conduct that is heavily influenced by ……. ………
State
Situational factors
Trait-State Theory: the higher up the hierarchy you go the lower the impact of situational factors - the better you …. … ….. ……. ……
tap into stable dispositional tendencies
Any attempt to classify personality differences rests on at least two fundamental assumptions which are?
- Human conduct shows some degree of consistency over different situations - i.e., cross-situational consistency
- Human conduct shows some degree of consistency over time - i.e., temporal consistency
Walter Mischel (1968) was the most vocal advocate of the situationalist doctrine, arguing the ways people behave in a particular social situation are determined by the social norms and conventions appropriate to that particular situation. Behaviour will therefore ….. from situation to situation, therefore there is no such thing as ……….. in behaviour …… different ……,,
differ
Consistency
across
situations
Situationalism has its roots in ………..
behaviourism
Situationalist Critique: Psychodynamic theory has emphasised the role of the ‘superego’ as an internalising moral agency that has a critical role in the regulation of all forms of conduct and in the control of impulses. It has been assumed that as a result of this process the child adopts parental standards and controls as his own. Give an example of what behaviour would be required to prove this assumption as true.
If the child has internalised the moral code of their parents then for example, a strong superego, then the child should behave in an upright moral way regardless of the situation.
Situationalist Critique: According to Mischel the correlation between behaviour in one situation and behaviour in another situation (or between personality measures and behaviour) is small and seldom exceeds what?
.40
Situationalist Critique: Mischel ((1968) stated that the initial assumptions of trait-state theory were logical, inherently plausible…. - [but] they simply have not been supported adequately. In a similar vein Ross & Nisbett (1991) observed that people who believe personally is important are committing the what?
Fundamental attribution error
Objections to Situationalism: There are two general lines of rebuttal to the situationalist critique of trait-state theory, empirical objections and theoretical objections. What are the two empirical objections?
- A correlation of .40 is not small
- A correlation of .40 is almost certainly an underestimate
Objections to Situationalism: There are two general lines of rebuttal to the situationalist critique of trait-state theory, empirical objections and theoretical objections. What are the two theoretical objections?
- Different people show different reactions to the same situation
- People can choose or create the situations they find themselves in
In an example provided by the lecturer - a social psychology experiment which looked at forced compliance with the explanation for results put down to cognitive dissonance, later determined that the actual correlation was between.36 and .42 (thus actual correlation resulting from the social situation) about the same size as the personality coefficients that had been criticised so sharply. Why were the correlations not calculated in the first place?
Mischel and other situationalist s never bothered to use their t-test / f values to then calculate the actual effect size in any of these pro dominant experiments. They simply assumed that situational factors must be more important than personality factors.
There are two general lines of rebuttal to the situationalist critique of trait-state theory: Empirical and Theoretical objections. What are the 2 empirical objections?
- A correlation of .40 is not small
- A correlation of .40 almost certainly an underestimate.
There are two general lines of rebuttal to the situationalist critique of trait-state theory: Empirical and Theoretical objections. What are the 2 theoretical objections?
- Different people show different reactions to the same situation.
- People can choose or create the situation they find themselves in.
A correlation of .40 is almost certainly an underestimate of the true predictive power of personality measures. Single observations are rarely a good measure of anything!
Traits are …….. tendencies which on their own are only useful for predicting……… behaviours not …….. behaviours.
Averaged
General
Specific