Taxonomies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Name the 3 taxonomic methods.

A
  • lexical approach
  • theoretical approach
  • factor analytic approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The adoption of the available taxonomic methods is important as it allows for ….

A

With over 18000 personality trait terms available, how does one then measure personality in a way that incorporates the entire range of available personality attributes. The current three taxonomic methods have thus been adopted for isolating this set of defining traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the lexical approach according to Galton (1884)?

A

According to the lexical hypothesis the most important personality traits are the ones with the most words to describe different levels of variation in the trait.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What personality trait has the highest synonym frequency in the English lexicon?

A

Extraversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the theoretical approach?

A

A “top down” approach which uses a given theoretical perspective to guide trait selection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Theoretical approach; Jungian theory identifies two fundamental attributes to the external object and objective facts. What are these two fundamental attitudes!

A

Extraversion is an outward-turning of libido or interest away from one’s own subjective inner experience towards the external objective world.

Introversion is the inward-turning of libido or interest that sets the self and the subjective psychological process above the objective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

According to Jungian theory, what would Extraversion at the extreme end of the continuum look like?

A

Borderline personality disorder: lacks the ability to form an abstract sense of themselves. Leads to feelings of dysphoria & emptiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

According to Jungian theory, what would introversion at the extreme end of the continuum look like?

A

Marked by a dangerous tendency to coerce facts into the shape of the idea of the subjective image (becomes a reality). An example is obsessive compulsive personality disorder.
- They loose sight of the objective due to the need to protect oneself from the projected idea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Eysenck observed that contemporary models of personality derived from factor analytic techniques suggest a four tiered hierarchical approach to taxonomy. What are these 4 levels?

A

Level 1: Individual Thoughts Feelings Behaviours (States)

Level 2: Habitual Thoughts Feelings Behaviours

Level 3: Traits

Level 4: Dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The distinction between traits (level 3) and dimensions (level 4) is not always made clear in the literature. What alternate terminology is used?

A

Level 3: narrow trait; first order factor; primary factor; facet

Level 4: broad trait; second order trait; type; domain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Factor analysis; when looking at the inter-correlations of the items, if you have for example, three clusters, these 3 clusters are said to be …..

A

Orthogonal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are factor loadings?

A

The degree to which an item (in this case, a trait) correlates with or “loads on” the underlying factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The question, “do we pitch our analysis at level 3 or level 4 according to the 4 tier hierarchy of taxonomy ?“ highlights the what dilemma?

A

Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma?

A

The disagreement as to whether or not analysis at the dimensional level as opposed to the level 3 trait level results in a loss of information (increasing the % of unexplained variance).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contemporary taxonomic models of personality tend to utilise the technique of factor analysis in combination with……..?

A

Either a lexical approach or theoretical approach for first identifying potential items before FA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are Spearman’s few ultimate functional unities? In other words, how many dimensions are required in order to describe key elements of an individual’s personality?

A

Factor analysis has produced a number of different taxonomic models but the 2 stand out models are:
- The Three Factor Model (Eysenck)
- The Five Factor Model (Costa & McCrae)

17
Q

Eysenck used factor analysis to identify which 3 distinct personality dimensions?

A
  • Psychoticism (socialised/superego)
    *superego a Freudian term meaning “doesn’t question the societal framework”
  • Extraversion (introversion)
  • Neuroticism (emotional stability)

PEN!!

18
Q

What are some of the level 3 traits that load onto Eysenck’s dimension of Extraversion?

A

Sociable
Lively
Active
Assertive
Sensational-seeking
Carefree
Dominant
Venturesome
Surgent

19
Q

What are some of the level 3 traits that load onto Eysenck’s dimension of Neuroticism?

A

Anxious
Depressed
Guilt feelings
Low self-esteem
Tense
Irrational
Shy
Moody
Emotional

20
Q

What are some of the level 3 traits that load onto Eysenck’s dimension of Psychoticism?

A

Aggressive
Cold
Egocentric
Impersonal
Impulsive
Antisocial
Unempathetic
Creative
Tough-minded

*rare to score at the high end of the continuum

21
Q

Eysenck’s Three Factor Model consists of 3 level 4 dimensions that are uncorrelated with one another, thus in statistical terms are said to be ……

A

orthogonal personality dimensions

22
Q

Costa & McCrae’s Five Factor Model is currently the most widely accepted taxonomy of personality traits, highlighting what dimensions?
(Got the impression that the lecturer prefers Eysenck’s PEN Model….)

A
  • Open to experience
  • Conscientiousness
  • Extraversion
  • Agreeableness
  • Neuroticism
23
Q

Name some of the level 3 traits that load onto Costa & McCrae’s FFM dimension of extraversion.

A
  • warmth
  • gregariousness
  • assertiveness
  • activity
  • excitement-seeking
  • positive emotions
24
Q

Name some of the level 3 traits that load onto Costa & McCrae’s FFM dimension of neuroticism.

A
  • anxiety
  • angry hostility
  • depression
  • self-consciousness
  • impulsivity
  • vulnerability
25
Q

Name some of the level 3 traits that load onto Costa & McCrae’s FFM dimension of openness.

A
  • fantasy
  • aesthetics
  • feelings
  • actions
  • ideas
  • values
26
Q

Name some of the level 3 traits that load onto Costa & McCrae’s FFM dimension of agreeableness.

A
  • trust
  • straightforward
  • altruism
  • compliance
  • modestly
  • tender-minded
27
Q

Name some of the level 3 traits that load onto Costa & McCrae’s FFM dimension of consciousness.

A
  • competence
  • order
  • dutifulness
  • achievement
  • self-discipline
  • deliberation
28
Q

Although Costa & McCrae’s FFM is currently the most dominant personality taxonomy, it had attracted some criticism. Who lead this criticism and what are the two issues raised?

A

Eysenck lead the criticism & the two issues raised are:
- are five factors too many?
- are all FFMs equivalent?

29
Q

Other than Costa & McCrae’s FFM, what are the other 2 main FFMs in circulation?

A
  • Goldberg’s FFM -IPIP
  • Zuckerman & Kuhlman’s FFM - ZKPQ
30
Q

I regards to one of Eysenck’s criticism’s regarding the equivalence of all FFMs, what is of particular disagreement?

A

There is particular disagreement about the content and replicability of what has been termed “the troublesome fifth factor “ : i.e., openness to experience

31
Q

Are all FFMs equivalent: A comparison of Costa & McCrae’s FFM (NEO PI) and Goldberg’s FFM (IPIP) shows a correlation of what for openness to experience?

A

.59

32
Q

What is Goldberg’s argument for the low correlation between his dimension of intellect (the so called equivalence of openness to experience) and Costa & McCrae’s dimension of openness to experience?

A

Goldberg argues that Costa & McCrae’s openness to experience factor taps only one aspect of intellect ( the imaginative side) but misses the other side (the logical side). He argues that when both sides are measured they tend to be positively correlated suggesting a single factor (intellect).

33
Q

A comparison of Costa & McCrae’s FFM and Zuckerman & Kuhlman’s FFM identities once again the “troublesome fifth factor “. What is the so called openness to experience equivalent named In Zuckerman & Kuhlman’s FFM?

A

Activity

34
Q

Eysenck points out that there are some significant correlations among Costa & McCrae’s five factors - suggesting there may be some higher order factors behind them. What are the 2 concerning FFM dimensions and what dimension does Eysenck believe lay behind them?

A

Openness to experience and Consciousness
Eysenck argues these 2 so called FFM dimensions are actually level 3 traits/constructs that load on his factor of Psychoticism.

35
Q

What did Zuckerman et al., (1993) find when he compared Eysenck’s 3 factor model with Costa & McCrae’s FFM and his own alternative FFM?

A

Zuckerman et al. found evidence for a 3 factor model and a 4 factor model, but not a 5 factor model. The 3 factor model fitting within Eysenck’s PEN framework.

36
Q

In regards to the taxonomy of personality, what is the key limitation of factor analysis?

A

Different factor solutions can explain similar amounts of variance in the correlation matrix.
- for instance, when a trait loads highly on more than one factor it is not clear which factor it belongs to.

37
Q

Limitations of factor analysis: Eysenck initially grouped impulsivity together with sociability as the the two main traits that defined the dimension of extraversion. He later shifted most impulsivity items over to the Psychoticism dimension. How has impulsivity been treated in the FFMs?

A

Costa & McCrae placed impulsivity under the neuroticism dimension, whereas other 5 factor theorists associate impulsivity with the consciousness dimension.

38
Q

Due to the troubles of clearly defining the exact number and traits that make up the dimensions of personality, what solution is suggested?

A

Construct validity must be established for factorial dimensions by relating factorial measures to external criterion and developing testable scientific theories.