TP2 Economic Foundations Flashcards
Sources of economic growth (Aggregate production function)
GDP=A(K, L, Anything else)
A=Technology
K=Physical Capital
L=Labour
Neoclassical (Exogenous) Growth theory, Solow (Swan) theory
*You get decreasing returns to any single factor of the production function.
*Constant returns if all input factors remain in the same proportion.
*Due to decreasing marginal returns, capital-poor countries will grow faster, and there should be convergence in long-run income levels.
*High population growth will lead to low level of income per capita
*Investment rate (growth rate of capital) is a key determinant of national wealth
*Decreasing MP produces convergence.
*Only technological progress can explain persistent increase in per capita growth - and this is exogenous (To the exogenous model)
Endogenous growth models
*We remove the assumption of decreasing Marginal Product of Capital (MBK) and instead assume constant MBK.
*Although each category of capital on its own has decreasing MP, together they have constant MP (Key point: Due to externalities and spill-overs).
*Human capital’s importance due to enabling a higher steady-state level of output and capital.
*Output = A X ((D+K)^b) X (K^a) X (L^c)
D = Human capital
K = Physical Capital
Note (D+K)^b is expressing there is spillover between human and physical capital
*Private return does not equal social return
*Increasing MP produces divergence
*An endogenous growth theory implication is that policies that embrace openness,
competition, change and innovation will promote growth.
Endogenous growth - Conditional convergence - What determines the steady state?
*Level of investment and savings
*Accumulation of human capital
*Institutions:
-Property Rights
-Regulatory institutions
-Macroeconomic Stabilisation
-Social Insurance
-Conflict management
-Political rights
World bank Worldwide Governance Indicators
*Voice and accountability
*Political Stability and lack of violence
*Government effectiveness
*Regulation quality
*Rule of law
*Corruption
Neutral VS Biased technology shift in production possibility frontier
3 forms of economic efficiency
*Productive efficiency: The economy could not produce any more of one food without sacrificing production of another good, production possibility frontier.
*Allocative efficiency: Every good or service is produced up to the point where the last unity provides a marginal benefit to consumers equal to the marginal cost of producing
*Dynamic efficiency: Not just static efficiency, but over time as well (particularly important for R&D, innovation)
Economic efficiency definition (Surplus)
Total surplus = Consumer surplus + Producer surplus
Pareton criterion
Not possible to make one person better off without making another worse off.
Compensation principle
Choose policies that yield the highest total economic surplus (Winners could compensate the losers and still be better off)
Sources of Market failure
- Monopoly power
- Asymmetric information
- Externalities
- Public goods - Often lead to free-rider
*Non-rival: A good for which the marginal cost of its provision to an additional consumer is zero
*Non-excludable: You cant exclude someone from consuming, so cant charge for its use.
Replacement Effect (Monopolists view of innovation)
*Monopoly provides less incentive to innovate than a competitive industry.
*This is because new market entrants see the entire profit increase of entering the market, whilst monopoly’s new profit is destrys old profits.
*(Arrow, 1962)
Cournout competition
*A fixed number of firms in the market
*All firms produce a homogeneous good
*Firms compete in terms of the quantities that they produce
*Firms do not cooperate
Nash equilibrium
The Nash Equilibrium is a component of game theory. It states that no player’s outcome can be determined by changing strategy. It was devised by 1994 Nobel Prize for Economics winner John Nash.
Efficiency Effect (Monopolists view of innovation)
*As with ‘Replacement effect’, however introduces the risk of a new market entrant entering as a low-cost firm in a duopoly.
*Now the cost of not innovating is losing the monopoly and its business.
*(Gilbert and Newbury, 1982)