TP paper 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is equity

A

a focus on fairness and ensuring people have what they need to improve their situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Christian Egalitarianism

A

Men and women were created equal and so should receive equal treatment. However there are biological differences between them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Augustinian predestination

A
  • man has free will, which is necessary for Gods Judgement of each individual. Free will is a gift from god, given to adam and eve at creation
  • Free wills use Leads to the goodness and badness in the world
  • god is Omniscient, therefore he has knowledge of all things before they happen
  • freedom is still possible with Gods foreknowledge
  • God does not have knowledge of specific actions, but only what someone would like to do in certain situations
    Therefore Gods foreknowledge doesn’t necessitate ones actions. What leads to sin are the choices that the individual makes, who is fallen in nature.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Calvinistic Double predestination

A
  • man does not have free will and instead all his actions are predestined.
  • he argued that since the fall, people are inherently sinful and nobody can be good enough to earn their way into heaven
  • salvation therefore must be a gift from a benevolent god- however it cannot be one that is earned, since it is impossible for man to achieve. It cannot be based on ones actions/ intentions in life.
  • God chooses who to give the gift of salvation to- the elect.
  • God must therefore also choose those who he will not give the gift of salvation to. They will go to Hell
  • this leads to double predestination- there are those chosen for heaven and those chosen for hell.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Boethius (freedom)

A

“Gods foreknowledge does not impose necessity on things”
- there is a difference between knowing something and causing that thing to happen
Boethius distinguished between two types of necessity:
1. Simple necessity: Human beings are mortal- it is part of our nature and unavoidable
2. Conditioned necessity: something cannot be and not be at the same time. If i am walking now, then i am necessarily walking - nothing else is possible. I only necessarily walk because i have chosen to walk. Therefore it is avoidable since it is down to choice
For Boethius, whenever we face conditioned necessity we have made a free choice. Therefore we have free will and can be judged for such free choices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non Religious teachings on free will

A

Libets experiment:
Libet’s experiment demonstrated that brain activity initiating movements hundreds of milliseconds before the conscious decision to do so. Conscious decisions didn’t cause the body to do things
Skinner and behaviourism:
Skinner- mental processes are learnt behaviours. Thought is a physical process
Conditioned process- i want food, be nice to parents, get food.
Mental states as separate from body= a radical misunderstanding
Mental acts are caused acts, explicable at a physical level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Traditional Christian Dualism

A

Augustines view of the human Body and soul
- Akrasia; upon being wounded from the Fall and developing original sin, human beings lost the unity between mind and body. Instead, the rational was weakened and became subject to the desires of the mind and the body, meaning human beings inevitably began to give into their bodily temptations
- human beings require Gods grace alone to overcome their sinful nature
- laws are required due to the fall

Matthew 10- “do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear those who can destroy both soul and body in hell”
Genesis 2- “then the lord God formed man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Substance Dualism (Descartes)

A

Body: “ the body by its very nature is always divisible”
Mind: “the mind is utterly indivisible. For when I consider the mind, or myself in so far as I am merely a thinking thing, I am unable to distinguish any parts within myself. I understand myself to be something quite single and complete”
Cogito ergo sum- assumes you can separate mind and body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Physicalism/ Materialism

A

Scientific:
Phineas Gage- train operator who’s personality changes- brought about by a physical injury
Philosophical:
Richard Dawkins: Dawkins argues that consciousness and other mental faculties may not be fully understood, but to create an immaterial substance is nonsense. They will be understood one day through science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Soul: Jackson and mary’s room

A

Qualia- things as percieved/ experienced by human being (subjective- only understood by the individual)
Marys room experiment- colour is more than physical facts, the subjective experience add knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Soul: Skinner and behaviourism

A

Mental processes are learnt behaviours. Thought is a physical process
Conditioned process- i want food, be nice to parents, get food
Mental states as separate from body= a radical misunderstanding.
Mental acts are caused acts, explicable at a physical level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

St Irenaeus- rational imago dei

A

Due to genesis 1:26, Irenaeus concluded that there were two stages to the creation of human beings
Stage one
Image- this means that mankind shares certain characteristics with God- personal beings with consciousness and moral natures. Humans are not created perfect, but with the potential to become perfect
Stage two
Likeness- this means that at birth human beings begin a process of growing and developing as they must develop their natures to be like God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Karl Barth (relational imago dei)

A

According to Barth, the relational aspect is seen in the fact man is created in the image of God, male and female. Man is capable of having a relationship with God and other Human beings. Therefore, Barth concludes that God created man for fellowship with himself and for fellowship with fellow human beings. According to Barth, sin didn’t affect the image of God.
“We cannot certainly deduce from this that man has lost it through the fall, either partially or completely, formally or materially”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Clines (functional imago dei)

A

Clines interprets the image and likeness of God in Genesis 1:26-27 from a strictly functional perspective, in which the image of God in man is the visible corporeal representative of the invisible, bodiless God. Man functions as a representative (not a representation) in his exercise of dominion: “this function is to represent God’s lordship to the lower orders of creation. The dominion of man over creation can hardly be excluded from the content of the image itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nurture as a foundation of belief (for)

A
  • brings you into a community
  • fideism: faith alone is enough, you don’t need reason for your faith
  • Ireneaus; grow in the likeness of God
  • 10 commandments “honour your mother and father”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nurture- reasons against

A
  • Marx: religion is an agent of social stratification- it divides society
    He describes religion as the “opium of the masses”. This shows how religion is used to keep people from rising up, therefore nurture isn’t good grounds for belief as it keeps people in their place and they should instead consider why they believe
  • Dawkins: religion is a form of indoctrination- children follow the example of their parents
    A specific religion is presented as fact from early childhood. All other religions are implied to be ‘wrong’
    Nurture creates a belief that faith is good
    Believing because of nurture is like belief in a celestial teapot; just because you have been told that god is fact and because science cant disprove god, doesnt mean god is real
    Too young for politics, but not religion?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Just war theory

A

Just cause: the war must be aimed at correcting an injustice
Proper authority: the war must be started by the proper authority and declared publicly.
Proper intention: the reason to go to war must be just - it must be motivated by the desire for peace
Probability: there must be a good belief that the desired outcome can be achieved
Proportionality: forced must be used proportionate to the force and no more than is necessary to win
Last resort: war must be the last resort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Fertility treatments

A

IVF
- more embryos created than used; undermines the view that life begins at conception
IUI
Surrogacy
Why do people do fertility treatments?
- they may be homosexual
- unable to concieve

Arguments against fertility treatment:
“Mechanical adultery” previous pope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Pacifism

A

Pacifism: The belief that war and violence are unjustifiable and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means
Absolute pacifism: it is never morally right to take part in violence or war, even in self defence
Conditional pacifism: war and violence are wrong in principle, however they may be required in certain ( extreme ) circumstances e.g. holy war and just war

Jesus was a pacifism (he provides an example of how to live your life)- when arrested he didnt resist arrest and demanded his apostles lay down their swords

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Arguments for pacifism

A

Jesus arrest: Jesus didn’t resist his arrest, and when his disciples went to fight the people coming to arrest him, he commanded that everyone put down their weapons.
Matthew 5:9 “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God”
Matthew 18:21-22- then peter came to Jesus and asked “Lord how many times should i forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?” Jesus answered “ i tell you not seven times but seventy-seven times”
Matthew 7:12- “ so in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the law and the prophets.”
Matthew 22:39 “thou shalt not kill”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Weapons of Mass destruction

A

Catholic Church – Catechism 2314:
“Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation.” A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons - to commit such crimes.

Church of England – The Church and of Bomb:

“Such weapons cannot be used without harming non-combatants and could never be proportionate to the just causes and aim of war”.

The Quakers – Quaker Faith & Practice 24.41:

“We believe that no one has the right to use [nuclear] weapons in his defence or to ask another person to use them on his behalf. To rely on the possession of nuclear weapons as a deterrent is faithless; to use them is a sin.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The UN

A

Purpose of the UN
1. To maintain peace and security
2. To develop friendly relations among nations
3. To achieve international co-operation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Bullying

A

Types of Bullying
- cyberbullying
- physical bullying
- verbal bullying

Agape love—> bullying is not the most loving option and is therefore bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Punishment

A
  1. Capital punishment
  2. Forced labour
  3. Imprisonment
    Aims of Punishment?
    - Deterrance: to instil fear into committing an act, maybe this is required due to our innately sinful nature since the fall (augustine)
    - Retribution: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth (however this is juxtaposed by Jesus SOTM teachings “you have heard it been said an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth… turn the other cheek)
    - rehabilitation: Sycamore tree- volunteer led victim awareness program that teaches the principles of restorative justice. “Forgive not seven times but seventy seven”
    - protection: maybe punishment should be aimed to keep dangerous people out of society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Sin and Crime

A

Sins (an offence against the will of God): adultery, murder, Blasphemy
Crimes (an offence against the laws of the land): robbery, murder, car theft

26
Q

Forgiveness, Reconciliation and Justice

A

The parable of the lost son- 11 Then He said: “A certain man had two sons. 12 And the younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the portion of goods that falls to me.’ So he divided to them his livelihood. 13 And not many days after, the younger son gathered all together, journeyed to a far country, and there wasted his possessions with prodigal living. 14 But when he had spent all, there arose a severe famine in that land, and he began to be in want. 15 Then he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country, and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. 16 And he would gladly have filled his stomach with the pods that the swine ate, and no one gave him anything…. “Now his older son was in the field. And as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 So he called one of the servants and asked what these things meant. 27 And he said to him, ‘Your brother has come, and because he has received him safe and sound, your father has killed the fatted calf.’
28 “But he was angry and would not go in. Therefore his father came out and pleaded with him. 29 So he answered and said to his father, ‘Lo, these many years I have been serving you; I never transgressed your commandment at any time; and yet you never gave me a young goat that I might make merry with my friends. 30 But as soon as this son of yours came, who has devoured your livelihood with harlots, you killed the fatted calf for him.’
31 “And he said to him, ‘Son, you are always with me, and all that I have is yours. 32 It was right that we should make merry and be glad, for your brother was dead and is alive again, and was lost and is found.’”

27
Q

Capital punishment ( against)

A

Humanism:

As humanists we recognize that we all only get one chance to live, which is why we work so hard to make life better for all human beings, regardless of race, creed, gender, or sexual orientation. This acknowledgment of the limited time that we each have to exist is the primary reason why the American Humanist Association officially came out in opposition to the death penalty by issuing the Humanist Resolution on Capital Punishment in 2001.
This resolution affirmed several humanist ideas and stated concerns that the AHA has with capital punishment: 1) that every human being has worth and dignity; 2) governments which employ the death penalty suffer diminished ethical standing; 3) innocent persons have been released from death row after their convictions for capital crimes were shown to have been in error; 4) improper and illegal actions by law enforcement officials has provided juries and judges with inaccurate or insufficient evidence which in turn has resulted in erroneous convictions; and 5) execution of any convicted but innocent person is an irreversible act. It is for these reasons that the AHA supports efforts to make capital punishment illegal and legislative and executive initiatives at the Federal and State levels to impose moratoriums on carrying out any existing capital verdicts.

Since there is only one life, each life is very precious and killing people removes their opportunity to make restitution to society.

The justice system is not fool proof, and countries which have capital punishment may execute an innocent person.

This damages the family of the wrongfully executed person and the justice system itself.

Most humanists and atheists would argue that we can still have moral systems without God, and there are many moral systems such as Utilitarianism that do not need God. On these grounds, we might argue that it is morally wrong to kill regardless of who is doing the killing, or we might argue that the consequences of killing are usually likely to be harmful (for the reasons above).

Christian:

Some Christians would argue that the death penalty can never be justified because ALL life is sacred and made in the image of God therefore all are capable of reform.

They believe Jesus Christ came to Earth to reform sinners, as he did with the woman caught in adultery in John 8:1-11. Additionally, there are many examples of forgiveness in the Bible and Jesus taught it is important to forgive.

Jesus amended the Old Testament teaching on retribution in Matthew 5:38-39 when he said: “…If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.”

Christians believe in the sanctity of life, that life is holy and belongs to God and therefore only God has the power to take life. In Romans 12:17-19 it states: Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody … Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: ‘It is mine to revenge; I will repay, says the Lord.

Many Christians will argue that Christ’s death ended the requirement for ‘blood sacrifice.’ This means that animal sacrifice is not necessary, but it might also mean that it is unnecessary to execute murderers.

28
Q

Capital punishment (for)

A

Some Christians argue that capital punishment helps to maintain order and protection in society. If sanctity of life is the most important principle in Christianity, then all possible means of securing it must be taken. DP is therefore, a necessary evil.

The Bible sets down the death penalty for some crimes, so it must be acceptable. This may be seen as retribution.

St Thomas Aquinas argued that peace in society was more important than reforming the sinner.

Some Christians agree with the death penalty because there are 36 capital offences mentioned in the Bible. It shows the seriousness of the commandment “thou shalt not kill” and that murderers who have taken a life themselves should be put to death as punishment.

29
Q

Meaning and purpose of life

A

Eternal life- the notion that life continues beyond this world after death
Salvation- to be saved through Christian belief
Salvation through Faith- salvation can only be achieved through faith in God
Salvation through works- salvation can be achieved through good actions
Grace of God- the love/mercy given by God to creation, simply because God wants humans to have it (not because we deserve it)

30
Q

SoL- as a consequence of Gods Love and imago Dei

A
  • giving life is an act of love by God
  • all human life is sacred because of Imago Dei- this marks humans out as special and beyond other parts of creation
  • therefore anything which violates the sanctity of life is unethical- only God can give and take innocent life
31
Q

SoL as subordinate to Agape love

A

Humans are created by God as a gift, however this act of creation does not give rise to an absolute principle about the SoL
- the traditional principle of SoL idolises life- it directs worship away from God. It is also an unjustified moral absolute- it would require us to not save dying people or allow those in permanent vegetative states to be kept in that condition without help
- this means that the principle of sanctity of life often conflicts with rational and loving decision making. Instead of doing what is best for the individual, the ‘taboo’ of stopping life is invoked.
- Fletcher argues there is nothing unique/ valuable about human life inherently. Fletcher argues that agape love should be the overriding principle of Christian Ethics. Where it comes into conflict with the sanctity of life principle, it should prevail- the most loving act should be identified on a case by case basis

32
Q

SoL as an invalid concept. Quality of life is what matters. (Peter singer)

A

We should pay much closer attention to the quality of life- if you have quality, then you have meaning.
Quality of life
- this might cover levels of pain/suffering, how close you are to death, the levels of pleasure ect.
- there is no one special quality that separates us from other animals. To assume otherwise is speciesism
- we have minds/brains but not souls
- sometimes it might be right to end life, for example a foetus with severe disabilities, or a dying person in severe pain who wants life to end.

33
Q

Christian complementarianism

A

Men and women have been created by God to be different and have different roles in life. (Catholicism—> equal but different)
- women have the burden of child rearing and men have the burden of work
- motherhood is the key component of the role of women in the family
- this was set out by pope John Paul (II) in his 1988 Papal encyclical- mulieris dignitatem
- the virgin mary is the role model for mothers —> through motherhood God creates a new covenant with humanity

34
Q

Disability

A
  • disabled priority seats
  • disabled parking
  • traffic light bumps
35
Q

Multi Ethnic society

A

Since 2001 there has been an increase in non- white British population in the UK
Humanists:
- worked extensively to improve race equality laws during the passage of the 20-06 and 2010 equality acts
- core beliefs around duty to make the most of life and help others to make the most of life too.

Christianity:
Anglican church defined racism as ‘the theory, prejudice and practice of disadvantaging someone solely on the grounds of their colour, culture and ethnic origin’
- racism has no part in the christian gospel and it contradicts our lords command to ‘love our neighbours as ourself

What are anglicans doing to improve?
1. Created a new senior role
2. Review recruitment practices
3. Increase involvement from board and leadership team
4. Engage all staff
5. Commit to better data

36
Q

Multi faith society

A

Since 2011 christianity is no longer 50% of the UK population
Exclusivism: religious differences are real- only one religion is correct, and any beliefs that contradict said religion are false. Only christianity is the path to salvation
Inclusivism: christianity is the only true religion, however non christians can also go to heaven
Pluralism: forget doctrine, and its differences between religions. Focus on the universality of religious experiences and a commitment to a way of life. All religious beliefs can be simultaneously be true, and are equally valid

37
Q

Conversion

A

Proselytization
Education
Nurture

“Make disciples of all nations”, and sent out the apostles to convert all mankind and gave them the gift of tongue to perform this
Could stem from blind bartimaeus “your faith has made you well” therefore christians may go around trying to convert disabled people

38
Q

Terrorism

A

The illegal use of violence to cause fear and intimidation for political aims. It is often carried out against civilians rather than military targets.
- some feel like they have no alternative to terrorism; they believe their actions have the potential to change, and they believe that the use of terror is an appropriate response to the given situation or opposition.
- terror groups may develop for a number of reasons; marginalisation of minority groups, international recognition, when religions freedoms are violated

39
Q

Terrorism: Islamic extremism (ISIS (Islamic State in Syria)

A

The majority of muslims say that these groups have distorted the islamic teaching on Jihad, which the Qur’an is a call to put Allah first in their lives and reflects the inner spiritual battle that has to be undertaken to achieve this.

40
Q

Differing Christian attitudes towards terrorism

A

Catholic Church Catechism
“Terrorism threatens, wounds, and kills indiscriminately; it is gravely against justice an charity”
- use of hatred, terror and violence by christians is NOT an appropriate way to find solutions in any situation
- responding to terrorism MAY REQUIRE an act of war. This means that an act of aggression that IS acceptable as a final resort to preserve innocent life in the face of the indiscriminate violence used by terrorists

The church of england
Opposes terrorist activity and accepts the use of lethal force as a last resort in dealing with terrorists. In its report (Facing the challenge of terrorism (2005)) it concluded that members of the Church of England ought to promote greater understanding, reconciliation and respect within their local communities.

41
Q

What is the catholic church’s position on homosexual relationships

A

Catholic Church
- Catechism 2358- men and women who have deep seated homosexual tendencies… must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity”.
- Leviticus 20:13- “if a man who lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both have done what is detestable”
- 1 Corinthians 6:9- “ or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor the drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God”

42
Q

What is the church of england view on homosexuality

A
  • ministers are not allowed to hold same sex partnerships
  • members of the church may enter same sex marriages, but they cannot be conducted by the church.
    Matthew 19:5-6- “for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. {Therefore when god has joined together let no one separate”}
    Genesis 1:28- “be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it”
43
Q

What is the episcopal church on homosexuality

A

Permitted same-sex marriage in 2015, based on its 1976 decloration that “homosexual persons are children of God who have full and equal claim with all other persons upon the love, acceptance, and pastoral concern and care of the church”

44
Q

Humanist views on homosexuality

A

We have long campaigned for a reform of marriage laws- in order to gain legal recognition for both same-sex and humanist marriage ceremonies. Same-sex and humanist marriage ceremonies. Same sex marriages are legal throughout the UK and crown dependencies, and were most recently legalised in Northern ireland.

45
Q

Cohabitation

A

When a couple live together without being married. Christians agree that one of the main roles of sex is to create new life and that it is a god given expression of love between two people. In genesis 1:28. The bible specifically links the act of sex with reproduction. For this reason many christians believe that a sexual relationship should be unique and happen only within marriage, so they believe pre-marital sex is wrong: therefore cohabitation may be wrong as it might lead to pre-marital sex

46
Q

Pre marital sex

A

All christians would agree that casual sex is wrong. Casual sex takes place outside of a loving relationship. An example of this would be when a person has a one night stand, where they have sex with a person whom they have only just met and whom they have no intention of forming a more permanent relationship with. This is known as fornication. This contradicts with biblical teachings that having sex outside marriage is sinful

47
Q

Divorce

A

Christians believe that a marriage relationship is entered into as a lifelong commitment. Divorce, however, causes disagreement among christians
“ the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two but one. Therefore what God has joined together , let man not separate” (Mark 10:8-9)

The catholic church
- belief that marriage is permanent
- marriage is a sacrament
- it shows the couples commitment to each other and it echoes Jesus’ commitment to his people
- they believe that divorce is always wrong and so is remarriage

The church of england
- may be impossible for a couple to remain together and that divorce is inevitable, for example abuse or adultery
- divorcees are free to remarry
- marriage offers 3 blessing
1. The creation and nurturing of children
2. The correct place for sexual relationships
3. Help and comfort during all aspects of life
- the church of england does not advocate divorce but it is allowed if the marriage has truly broken down and cannot be repaired. Someone who is divorced can now remarry in an anglican church
Divorce- yes (sometimes)
Remarriage- yes

The Humanists
- divorce: yes
- remarriage: yes

48
Q

Views on divorce

A
49
Q

Family life

A

Models of families
- single parent
- nuclear
- different gender/ same gender parents
- extended
- co-habiting partners

50
Q

Quaker views on family

A

Men and women are equal and the same
They focus on the testimony of equality: the belief that God is within all people equally, He values all people equally, and all people can experience God equally. These beliefs found most of quaker beliefs- including their position of absolute pacifism

51
Q

Utilitarianism

A

• Deontology- are actions right or wrong
▪ Lying is always wrong ect
• Virtue ethics- character and motivation that a good person might have
• Consequentialism- ‘teleological’ consequence of actions (morally right is for the best)
▪ Deals with very difficult cases (crazy axe murderer ect)
▪ Should you let the axe murder know where your sister is ( deonotological = wrong) consequence could lead to your sisters death, so lying is best
▪ (virtue ethics- epistomological issue –> how do we know what a good person would do, based on motivation of actions)
• Utilitarianism –> morally right = more utility for everyone
▪ Produce the most of that good
▪ Altruism vs egoism (selfless/ selfish) ‘everyone counts for one and no more than one’
▪ How should you weigh one groups interest over another (hedonic calculus –> pick the outcome that produces the most happiness from the most people)

Jeremy Bentham
• Primary consern of legal and social reform (archaic laws )
▪ Failed to have utitilty
▪ If the law or an action cannot do any good, it cannot be any good
• Think about consequences of laws and actions (not good for virtue ethics)
• Equality> Liberty
• Humans are only motivated by pleasure than pain (psychological egoism) –>utiltiarianism isnt intrinsically egoistic
• Try and create greatest happiness for greatest number, however if bentham is correct why would we help others if it makes us less happy than selfish gain have
• If I can do it it is not the case that im ought to do something
• We can use the calculus to create ‘rules of thumb’

Problems
Rights
• Committed to morally right = most utility
• Too liberal?
• Certain ways we cannot act ect.
○ Bentham called rights nonsense on stilts (unintelligible, false, and both)
○ Right to a fair trial? It shouldn’t matter if plenty would benefit if trial was unfair
Dirty hands objection
• Utilitarianism can cause someone to do a very bad action
Fairness
• Doesn’t care who gets the pleasure and pain
• Hand over innocent to mob to be killed to stop a riot that would kill many? –> unfair in utilitarian eyes
• Save stranger or loved one? (bernard williams–> modify sit so you save your loved one
‘one thought to few,’ –> 20 innocents about to be shot (if you shoot one we will let the other 19 go, if you don’t then they will be shot) -> utilitarian would shoot that one

52
Q

Sin and the fall

A

Innate altruism experiment
- suggests that infants as young as three months-old have innate preferences for altruistic individuals
- each puppet had a unique shape and colour for the infants to easily distinguish; over 80% of the infants selected the “helpful” puppet

The milgram experiment
- shows societal subservience to authority and how even if instructed to do bad things they will go through with it

The bystander effect
- the more people, the fewer people the more likely someone is to help

53
Q

Heaven, hell, purgatory, last judgement

A
  • heaven for those who have lived a blessed life such as a saint
  • hell for those guilty of mortal sins
  • purgatory for those who have committed venial sins (sins that damage the soul such as greed)
54
Q

Human duties

A

Stewardship: “you have been encouraged to return to god what you have been given with increase” (matthews gospel)

Satre (existentialist): you should strive to create your own purpose in life

Humanists: innate duty to make the most of life and help others make the most of life as you only live once

Purpose to do good for salvation

55
Q

Arguments against the existance of God

A

David Hume- in opposition to paleys watch analogy: if you were to stumble upon a cabbage, despite it being intricate you would not assume a designer, so therefore the earth is made naturally

56
Q

Arguments for god as a creator

A

Teleological
- design: paleys watch
Cosmological
- causation ( everything requires a first cause- god is outside spacio temporal universe so would make sense as a creator)- aquinas

Pascals wager: god exists or he doesnt if he does and you believe then no downside, if he does and you dont believe then eternity in hell

57
Q

Abortion

A

If belief that life begins at conception then= murder

Equally women should have bodily autonomy

58
Q

Childlessness and celibacy

A

Fostering and adoption
- papal address 2000- devotion to a child is more important than genetic relationship
- Utilitarian- better for society- many children in system end up in prison

Celibacy
- monks and nuns take a vow of celibacy
- “better to marry than to burn woth passion”
- paul sees family life as a distraction from true meaning and purpose of life- religion
- jesus was celibate

Why no children?
- expensive
- distraction from work and religion
- jesus didnt have children

59
Q

Holy war

A
  • achievement of religious goal
  • authorised by religious leader
  • spiritual reward for those who partake
60
Q

human rights

A

Freedom of speech
Freedom of religion
Freedom to marry

61
Q

Relationships between rich and poor

A

Apply utilitarianism, humanism

Agape love

Christians may give money to charity

62
Q

Non religious views about free will

A

Determinism

Determinism is the belief that every event, including human actions and decisions, is causally determined by preceding factors. According to this perspective, free will is an illusion because all actions are ultimately determined by prior causes, such as genetics, upbringing, environmental influences, and brain processes. Advocates of determinism argue that if one were aware of all relevant factors influencing a decision, they could predict the outcome, suggesting that human choices are predetermined and not truly free

Existentialism

Existentialist philosophy presents a perspective on free will that emphasizes personal responsibility and individual choice in the face of the inherent meaninglessness of existence. Existentialists argue that individuals have the freedom to create their own meaning and purpose in life through their actions and choices, even in a world devoid of inherent meaning. They view free will as a subjective experience, acknowledging the constraints of external factors but emphasizing the individual’s responsibility to make authentic choices