torts- neligence Flashcards
Negligence
- Duty
- Breach
- Causation
- Damages
- Regular negligence, negligence per se, or res ipsa loquitor
- Duty owed to foreseeable Ps
- SOC: reasonably prudent person
Known trespasser
- Warn of known dangers (known, manmade death traps)
- No duty of care to unknown trespasser
Licensee
- Social guest
- Warn of known concealed dangers
Invitee
- Businesses
- Warn, inspect, and make safe
parent/child duties
Duty of a parent
- Knew/should have known that child was likely to cause harm
Duty of a child
- Reasonably prudent children of same age, experience, and intelligence
- Except when engaging in adult activities (motor vehicles)
Duty of a professional
- Similar/average professionals with the same education, training, and customs
Exception to general no duty to rescue
- Assumption of duty
- Special relationship (common carrier, inkeeper-guest, teacher-student, employer’-‘ee)
Breach of duty
- Failure to comply with duty of care
causations
Actual causation (cause in fact)
- But for
- Almost always met
Proximate causation
- Foreseeability
- Need both actual and proximate causations
- Intervening cause: foreseeable event, pay all damages (med mal, subsequent disease or accident, negligent rescuer, protective/reactive forces)
- Superseding cause: unforeseeable event, cuts off liability (act of God, intentional tort, criminal act)
Damages
Physical injury
Defenses to negligence
Pure comparative negligence
- P’s damages reduced by % of fault
- Assume pure comparative negligence jur unless otherwise
Defenses to negligence
Modified/modern/partial comparative negligence
- P cannot recover if more than 50% at fault
Defenses to negligence
Contributory negligence
- P cannot recover if at fault
- Last clear chance exception:
- D had last clear change to avoid accident
- D did not do so
- P can recover
Defenses to negligence
Assumption of the risk
- Must have knowledge
Must appreciate the danger
Joint and several liability
- 2 or more people cause single accident
- All Ds jointly and severally liable for damages (P can choose)
- Merged causes: If 2 Ds + 2 breaches + merged = use substantial factor test. If breach would have been able to cause entire harm if it had been only breach, it’s a substantial factor
□ Merged cause –> D held jointly and severally liable - Unascertainable cause: 2 acts, only one of which causes injury but unknown which one
Shifts burden of proof to Ds. If fails –> jointly and severally liable - Contribution: co-Ds can sue to recoup money