Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Trespassers in FL

A
  • Discovered
  • Undiscovered
  • Impaired
  • Child
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Discovered trepassers

A
  • Uninvited/unpermitted entry
  • discovered w/i 24 hours before injury

DOC liablity:

  • gross neg
  • intentional misconduct (causing injury)
  • failure to warn of known dangerous condition

If LO makes express invitation after discovery or manifests intention to hold proprety open, trepasser becomes invitee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Undiscovered trespassers

A

Enters property w/o invitation or license; entry undetected w/i 24 hours hours before accident

DOC liability: intentional conduct only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Uninvited licensees

A
  • Enters property for own convenience or pleasure
  • presence tolerated by owner

DOC liability

  • intentional misconduct
  • gross neg
  • no warning of dangerous conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Invited licensee (Girl scout)

A

enters property w/ permission

DOC: Reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Business Invitees (grocery shopper)

A

enters propert to provide commerical benefit to owner

DOC: reasonable care

This picks up firefighters/etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Public invitees (beach goer)

A

Enter property to enjoy use for which it’s held out

DOC: Reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Child trespassers

A

Child can’t avail himself of AND unless he was actually lured or enticed onto property by AN

Doesn’t apply if kid enters property and then discovers AN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CAusation

A

Need both

  • cause in fact (but-for/actual causation)
  • proximate causation (legal cause/forseeability - did D foreseeably and substantially cause injury?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rear end collisions

A

Rebuttable presumption that rear driver was sole proxixmate cause of accident

Driver has to show:

  • other driver has to show abrupt lane change not reasonable expected
  • illegal stop
  • mechanical failure of his own car
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dangerous Instrumentaltity Doctrine

A

All cars and motorized vehicles are DIs

Owner of car liable for all torts committed by another driver if they have knowledge and gave consent

Parents/kids - parents are J&S liable for teen drivers (in addition to general DID)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Punitive damages (no RS)

A

P must

  • plead damages; and
  • establish by C&C evidence that D was personally guilty of gross neg (so reckless or wanting in care that constitutes conscious disregard or indifference)

Can’t exceed $500K or 3x compensatory damages - whichever greater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Punitive damages (RS)

A

P can only get PD if

  • employee guilty of intentional misconduct or gross neg; and
  • employer actively or knowingly participated/ratified/consented or enaged in gross neg contribtuing to injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Recovery for NIED - Bystanders

A

P can’t recover unless he suffers:

  1. physical injury OR
  2. manifestation of injury/distress in form of severe & discernable physical illness (heart attack)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bystander claims - Recovery

A

Must show:

  • spatial proxmity
  • contemporaneous proximity
  • relational proximity (determed on case by case basis)
  • physical injury/illness or physical impact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wrongful death damages

A
  • loss of support
  • spouse only - loss of companionship
  • loss of parental companionship
  • med/funeral expenses
  • loss of earnings form date of injury/death
  • loss of prospective net accumulation of estate (future contributions to estate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Wrongful death damages - Mental pain & suffering

A
  • surviving spouse
  • minor children
  • all children if no SS
  • parents of deceased minor child
18
Q

Injuries to family - Damages

A
  • Loss of parental companionship - injured parent, minor (usually child) claimant
  • Filial companionship or consortium - injured child, parent claimant (only until kid turns 18)
19
Q

Seat belt defense

A

Failure to wear seatbelt may contribute to comparative neg

If raising this defense, D must prove:

  1. P failed to use available & operational seatbelt
  2. nonuse was unreasonable
  3. nonuse caused/substantially contributed to damages
20
Q

FL Uniform Contribution among Tortfeasors Act

A

If J&S liablity is involved (intentional torts only), D who pays more than his share has right to contribution

Fault percentages allocated based on each D’s relative degree of fault

21
Q

Assumption of Risk

A

Exculpatory waivers are okay if:

  • clear & unequivocal
  • waives only neg or gross neg
  • applies to adults
22
Q

3 types of product liability

A
  1. manfuacturing defect
  2. warnings defect
  3. design defect

FL uses Consumer Expectations Test: P must show product didn’t perform as safely as ordinary consumer would expect when used in intended/reasonably foreseeable manner

23
Q

State immunity

A

State of FL liable:

for injury to property, persons or death caused by its employee’s negligence if employee was acting in scope of employment

Employees personally liable if:

  • bad faith
  • w/ malicious purpose
  • willful and wanton disregard of others’ safety
24
Q

Strict liability - DAD

A
  • defective products
  • wild animals
  • dangerous/hazardous activities
25
Q

Defamation

A
  1. Defamatory communication
  2. Plaintiff is ID’ed
  3. Publication to at least 1 party
  4. damage caused by publication
  5. fault (negligence or malice, if it’s public official)
  6. falsit

Truth is absolute defense

26
Q

Invasiion of prviacy

A

Intrusion on seclusion - D’s intrusion into private affairs; highly offensive to reasonable person

False Light - public facts; placed P in false light; highly offensive to RP; actual malice

Appropriation - D’s unauthorized appropration of P’s likeness/identiy; D’s advantage; lack of consent; injury

Private facts - D gave publicity to private life; highly offensive to RP; not a legit concern of public

27
Q

Negligent Misrepresentation

A
  • D provides false info resulting from his own neg
  • during course of his profession
  • causing P to justifiably rely on info
  • P is either in contractual relationsihp w/ D or is 3P who D should know is benefiting from info

Ex: store customer who bought dangerous supplement based on clerk’s misrep

28
Q

Intentional misrepresentation

A
  1. Material fact
  2. D knows it’s false or has reckless disregard for its truth
  3. intended that P rely on it
  4. P justifiably relied on it
  5. P suffered and can prove damages
29
Q

DOC for phsycians

A

Generalists - local standard

Specialists - national standard

30
Q

Recovery for med malpractice (lack of consent)

A

P cant’ recvoer based on lack of informe consent if

  • reasonable person woudl have genreal understanding of procedure/risks given materials provided, OR
  • patient would reasonably have consented if so advised

rebuttable presumption of valid consent when patient signs in writing per standard practice

31
Q

Noneconomic damages - med malpractice

A

Cap on damages unconstitutional under EP of FL constitution - applies regardless of number of complainants and improperly discriminates between MM victims

** Loss of chance of recovery - P can only recover if proves evidence of greater than even change of survival before negligence

32
Q

Negligence per se

A

Violation of penal statute/ordinance = negligence per se

33
Q

Intervening cause

Superseding cause

A

cause of P’s harm occuring after D’s tortious act

Superseding cause - breaks chain of proximate causation => D not liable

  • unforseeable, not set in motion by D’s actions
34
Q

Dram-shop

A

Not SL - if seller willfully/unlawfully gives alcohol to minor or alcoholic, maybe liable for resulting injurie

35
Q

Defenses to products liability

A

comparative fault

  • AOR
  • unforeseeable misuse, alteration, modification by user
  • compliance w/ gov safety standards

state of the art standard - look at time of manufacture, not injury

  • if complied, rebuttable presumption that not defective; if no, rebuttable presumption that it is

unforseeable intervening causes

36
Q

Informed consent - Physicians/tec.

A

no recovery allowed when:

consent obtained in accordance w/ accepted standard of med practice among similarly trained/experienced med professionals AND

  • reasonable person would have general understandng of proceedure, acceptable alternatives, inherent risks
  • based on circumstances, patien would reasonably have undergone such porcedure/treatment had he been advised

Must be in writing, signed by pateint or authorized person

Creates rebuttable presumption of consent

37
Q

Collateral source rules

A

Damages reduced by total of all amounts paid for benefit of claims (i.e. insurance) UNLESS there’s right of subrogation/reimbursement.

38
Q

Med malpractice - personal injury /wrongful death

A

can’t file PI/WD claim unless reasonable investigaton conducted re: GF grounds for negligence claim - written opinion from expert there stating appears to be medical negligence

39
Q

Medical Malpractice Act

A

Presuit investigation - P needs expert opinion corroborating reasonable grounds

notice to Ds - Notice of intention within 90 days of filing suit (including providers seen subsquent, 2 years prior, and all med records)

screening process by D - based on insurer’s investigation procedures

resposne from D - can reject, offer setltement, admit liability

40
Q
A