Torts Flashcards
Intentional Torts [Three Elements]
- Act
- Intent
- Causation
Intent
Acts with purpose of cause consequence, or knows consequence is substantially certain.
Transferred Intent
Intent to cause tort or a tort can be transferred to different person and/or tort.
Battery
- Harmful or offensive contact
- Causes injury pain or illness
- OR is offensive to person of ordinary sensibility
- Must intend the contact
- Can recover nominal damages
- No battery if there is consent
Assault
- Reasonable apprehension of imminent harm
- Intends to cause apprehension or contact
- Plaintiff must be aware, must be reasonable
- Imminent, no substantial delay
- More than mere words
- Can recover nominal damages
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Intend to cause distress or act with recklessness
- Engage in extreme and outrageous conduct that causes the distress
- Must be cause of harm
- Prove damages beyond distress an ordinary person would endure
- Exception for public figures, must show false statement made with actual malice (recklessness of knowledge of falsity)
- hypersensitivity only a factor if P was aware of it
Can end up causing harm to third parties. If bystander requires actual physical harm.
False Imprisonment
- confine or restrain within fixed boundaries
- Plaintiff is aware OR harmed
- can be through physical barriers, restraint, or threat. Or failure to provide reasonable means to escape where there is duty
- Intent or knowing
- Can recover nominal damages
Defenses to Intentional Torts
- Consent
- Self-defense
- Defense of Others
- Defense of Property
- Parental Discipline
- Privilege of Arrest
Consent
Express consent: words or actions, willingness to submit to conduct
Implied consent: silent where silence can reasonably construed of consent. i.e. emergencies, injury, mutual consent to combat
Self-defense
Use of reasonable force - proportionate to defend against harm
Generally, no duty to retreat in modern states.
Not liable for accidental injury to bystanders absent negligence.
May use reasonable force in defense of others
Defense of Property
Reasonable force if necessary to prevent tortious harm.
May never use deadly force.
Citizen Arrest
Must know felony has been committed and reasonably believe person is perp.
Tresspass to Chattel
- disposses, use, interfere or damage chatell
- Intend act
- Only actual damages
Tresspass to land
- physical invasion of land
- intent to enter land
- no actual damages required
- Necessity as defense to trespass, still liable for actual damages in private necessity.
Private Nuisance
substantially and unreasonably interferes with use and enjoyment
annoying to ordinary, reasonable person.
Defense: regulatory compliance, coming to the nuisance
Public Nuisance
Unreasonable interference with public as a whole. Private plaintiff must show special or unique harm.
Elements of Negligence
- Duty
- Breach
- Causation
- Damages
Is there a duty
Duty of care to those who may be foreseeably harmed by conduct.
No affirmative duty
Scope of Duty
Foreseeability of Harm & Foreseeability of Plaintiff
Standard of Care
Reasonably prudent person under the circumstances - Objective standard.
Presumed to have average mental abilities
Intoxication not considered unless involuntary
Standard of Care [children]
modified standard to reasonable child of similar age, unless child is engaged in high-risk adult activity
Standard of Care [tresspasser]
Refrain from willful, wanton, intentional, or reckless misconduct
Attractive nuisance doctrine
- artificial condition where knows children are likley to trespass
- condition poses unreasonable risk of death or harm
- children do not discover or cannot appreciate danger
- slight utility of maintaining compared to risk of injury
- fails to exercise reasonable care
Standard of Care [licensee]
Must make reasonably safe and/or warn of concealed dangers. No duty to inspect
Standard of Care [invitees]
owes duty of reasonable care, to inspect, discover dangerous conditions, and protect from them.
Non-delegable duty
Breach of Duty
Reasonable Person Standard or B
Breach for Professionals
evidence of custom admissible, dispositive
Breach for Physicians
- modern trend to national standard
- patients must give consent and docs. must explain risks unless:
a. risks are commonly known
b. patient is unconcious
c. patient waives/refuses the information
d. patient is incompetent; or
e. would be harmed by disclsoure
Breach of statutes
negligence per se
- law imposes duty
- vioaltes statute
- P in class intended to be protected by law
- accident type of harm sought to be avoided by law
- harm was caused by violation of statute.
-can excuse/rebut if complying with statue was more dangerous than violating or compliance was impossible
Res ipsa Loquitur
In some cases, circumstantial evidence can be enough.
- accident is type that does not normally occur without negligence
- was caused by something within exclusive control of D
- was not due to any negligence by P
Res Ipsa modern trends
- Med Mal. hold all D’s jointly & severably liable
- Products liability, will often ignore exclusivity requriements
- comparative-fault - many loosely apply third element
Causation
Cause in fact, actual cause
Proximate Cuase, legal cause
Cause in fact
But for test
Substantial factor Test
when multople factors make actual cause difficult, can apply subtantial factor test.
Loss of chance
In case of disease where death is more likely than not, D can recover loss of chance
Proximate cause
Is injury within scope of breach/
1. Foreseeability of harm