Torts Flashcards
Assault
1) A volitional act 2) done with the intent to cause either a) harmful or offensive contact or b) apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact that 3) causes the reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact
Battery
1) A volitional act 2) done with the intent to cause either a) harmful or offensive contact or b) apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact that 3) causes harmful or offensive contact with P’s person
False Imprisonment
1) An act intending to confine someone within a bounded area 2) that results in such confinement & 3) P is either conscious of or harmed by the confinement
False Imprisonment - Shopkeeper’s Privilege
1) D reasonably believes a theft has occurred & 2) holds P for a reasonable time to ascertain the facts 3) in a reasonable manner
False Imprisonment - Crime Prevention
Private person may arrest someone if he has a reasonable belief that a crime involving a breach of the peace occurred
Trespass to Land
1) Entry onto or remaining upon the land 2) of another 3) without a privilege to do so
Trespass to Chattels
1) An intermeddling or dispossession 2) of another’s personal property 3) which causes harm to, or the loss of use of, the personal property
Conversion
1) Interference with P’s right of possession 2) serious enough to warrant that D pay the full value of the chattel at the time of conversion
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
1) Intent to cause severe emotional distress & 2) extreme & outrageous conduct that 3) causes severe emotional distress
Insults alone aren’t enough
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
Requires P to show physical harm from the emotional distress
No physical harm required if there’s mishandling of a relative’s corpse, false positive diagnosis, or where P & injured person are closely related & P was present at the scene & saw the injury
Abuse of Process
1) Using a legitimate process 2) for a wrongful purpose & 3) an act or threat against P to accomplish the wrongful purpose
Malicious Prosecution
1) Initiation of a proceeding 2) without probable cause 3) for a wrongful purpose & 4) the favorable termination of the proceeding on the merits
Negligence - Umbrella Rule
Negligence requires duty, breach of duty, actual causation, proximate causation, and harm
Duty - Ordinary Duty
D has a duty to act as a reasonable person under the circumstances. D had a duty to X to avoid Y
Duty of Landowners - General
Landowner owes no duty to protect passersby outside the premises from natural conditions
Duty of Landowners - General Exceptions
1) Duty to protect passersby from unreasonably dangerous artificial conditions abutting the land
2) Duty to take precautions to protect passersby from dangerous conditions
Duty to Invitee
Enters the land for business purpose of possessor (customer)
Duty to inspect, discover, repair/warn against known or discoverable dangerous conditions
Duty to Licensee
Enters the land for own purpose (social guest)
Duty to repair or warn against known dangers
Duty to Known Trespasser
Duty to warn of artificial, non-obvious dangerous conditions maintained by landowner
Attractive Nuisance Doctrine
P must show 1) owner knows or should know of dangerous condition on the land; 2) owner knows kids frequent the vicinity of the dangerous condition; 3) the condition is likely to cause injury because of the kid’s inability to appreciate the risk; & 4) the cost of remedying the risk is slight compared to the magnitude of the risk
Duty to Control the Conduct of Others
If D has the ability & authority to control a 3rd party or domestic animal, D has an affirmative duty to control its conduct if D knows or should know of the 3rd party or domestic animal’s propensity to act in a dangerous way
Firefighter’s Rule
Bars firefighters and police officers from recovering from injuries caused by the risks of their job or effectuating a rescue
Rescuer’s Rule
Rescuee is liable to a rescuer if the rescuee’s negligence put herself in the position to be rescued
Breach of Duty - ordinary
D breached her duty to X when she Y
Negligence per se
1) There’s a criminal law, 2) P is a member of the class of persons intended to be protected by the law, & 3) P’s harm is the type of harm intended to be protected against by the law
Actual Cause - But For
But for D’s breach, P would not have been harmed
Actual Cause - Concurrent Causes
If there are concurrent causes & either alone is sufficient as a cause, use the substantial factor test
Proximate Cause
D is liable for all harmful risks foreseeable from the conduct. It’s foreseeable that X may cause Y
Harm
P must be harmed as a result of D’s conduct. P was injured because Z
Can’t recover for purely economic harm