Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What sorts of damages are recoverable in a personal injury suit?

A

1) Actual damages incurred

2) Past and future pain and suffering (emotional distress)

3) Medical expenses

4) Lost wages and reduction in future earnings capacity

5) Loss of Consortium

Attorney fees are never recoverable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is trespass and what count’s as a physical invasion?

A

Trespass is a defendant’s intentional conduct that causes a physical invasion of the land of another. Includes:

1) Physically entering land

2) Intentionally flooding land

3) Throwing an object onto the land

4) Intentionally emitting particles into the air over the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the types of defects that are relevant for a strict product liability claim?

A

Product is defective when, at the time of sale or distribution, it contains:

1) Manufacturing defect

2) Design defect

3) Inadequate instructions or warnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is a third party seller liable under strict products liability?

A

If the third party is in the business of selling the product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is a defendant criminally liable for failing to help others in trouble?

A

No, although a special relationship may place a legal duty on the defendant to act in certain instances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can someone be liable as an accomplice?

A

1) Aids or abets a principal

2) Prior or during commission of crime

3) With the intent and purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Regarding Voluntary Manslaughter, are provocative words adequate to arouse a sudden or intense passion to which the defendant loses control?

A

No!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is the rare time that mistake of law is a proper defense?

A

When the mistake negates the required intent or mental state.

EX: Daniel breaks into someone’s home, intending to use their flat screen TV. Daniel mistakenly thinks that doing so is a felony. Even if Daniel intended to commit what they believed was a felony, it was NOT a felony; therefore, I did not have the specific intent to commit a felony!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

May an occupant use deadly force against an intruder existing the occupant’s dwelling?

A

No!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is there a right to use deadly force in defense of property?

A

Generally, there is no right….

UNLESS! Person uses deadly force to prevent or terminate forcible entry into a dwelling if occupant reasonably believes intruder intents to commit a felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an abnormally dangerous activity and for what sort of suit is it relevant for?

A

ABA:

1) With high risk of harm

2) Not commonly found in community

3) Risk cannot be eliminated with due care

[Must show actual/proximate cause and actual damages]

Is a strict liability tort!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a defense towards strict liability crimes?

A

Assumption of the Risk

Where plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly assumed risk of their behavior!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do you prove a manufacturing defect?

A

Demonstrate a deviation from what manufacture intended.

1) Product was defective

2) Defect existed at time product left defendant’s control

3) Defect caused plaintiffs injuries when product was used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you prove a design defect?

A

Two ways:

Consumer Expectation Test: Show that product is dangerous beyond the expectation of an ordinary customer.

Risk-Utility Test: Plaintiff shows that a reasonable alternative design, that is economically feasible, was available to the defendant and failure to do so rendered the product unreasonably safe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do you demonstrate a defect for failure to warn?

A

Occurs when there are

1) Foreseeable harms

2) Not obvious to ordinary user

3) Which could have been reduced/avoided with reasonable instructions or warnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What defenses are used for a strict product liability tort?

A

Contributory Negligence: Complete bar when plaintiffs fault consisted of unreasonably proceeding in face of known defect

** Pure Comparative Negligence**: Damages reduced based on the the proportion of plaintiff’s fault.

Assumption of the Risk: Complete bar if voluntarily and knowingly assumed risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Who has standing to bring a public nuisance claim?

A

1) The government

2) A private party, if the person can show they suffered a special injury that is different to the kind suffered by general public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the learned intermediary rule?

A

The manufacturer of a prescription drug or medical device typically satisfies its duty to warn by informing the prescribing physician of problems with the drug or device rather than informing the patient taking the drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a wrongful death claim?

A

When a decedent’s spouse, next of kin, or personal representative brings suit to recover losses suffered as a result of the decedent’s death.

Generally, can recover:

1) Loss of Support (Income)

2) Loss of companionship

Limited to what deceased would have recovered if lived!

**Not pain and suffering!*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the intent requirement for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

A

1) Intentionally caused severe emotional distress

2) Recklessly causes severe emotional distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When is a possessor of a wild animal strictly liable for injuries caused by the animal?

A

When the injuries that occur result from the dangerous propensities of the animal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When is a supplier of a component strictly liable for the failure of a product that uses it’s component?

A

1) Component itself is defective

2) Supplier substantially participates in process and component causes the defect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Generally, how can an individual recover through a theory of negligent infliction of emotional distress?

A

1) Was within the zone of danger of threatened impact

2) Threat of physical impact caused emotional distress

(Emotional distress = physical symptoms!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

For someone not within the zone of danger, how can an individual recover under a theory of negligent infliction of emotional distress?

A

1) Closely related to person injured

2) Present at the scene of the injury

3) Personally observed or perceived the injury

25
Q

What are the requirements for the attractive nuisance doctrine?

A

1) Artificial condition

2) Landowner knows or has reason to know children are likely to trespass

3) Landowners knows or has reason to know that condition possesses an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury to children

4) Children, because of their age, do not discover or cannot appreciate the danger of the condition

5) Utility of maintaining the condition does not outweigh the risk of harm

6) Landowner fails to take reasonable care

26
Q

What is required for a negligent entrustment case?

A

An individual can be liable for entrusting someone if the owner knows or should have known of the person’s negligent propensities.

27
Q

What is the difference between joint and several and pure several liability re: tort claims?

A

Joint and Several: Can obtain full recovery from one defendant. Other defendants can seek contributions from others defendants.

Pure Several: Each defendant is only liable for the amount they were negligent.

28
Q

In a comparative fault jurisdiction, is the plaintiff’s assumption of the risk a separate defense?

A

No!

This is because the plaintiff’s negligence is already being considered in a comparative fault jurisdiction.

In contrast, this would be an absolute bar in a CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE theory.

29
Q

How can one recover for an Public Disclosure of Private Facts tort?

A

Plaintiff must show:

1) Defendant gave publicity to matter concerning private life of another

2) Matter publicized is the in that would be highly offensive to reasonable person

3) Not a legitimate concern to the public

NO NEED FOR MALICE

30
Q

How can one recover for an Intrusion upon Seclusion tort?

A

Plaintiff must show

1) Defendant’s intentional intrusion into plaintiffs private affairs (physical or otherwise)

2) Intrusion is highly offensive to a reasonable person

No publication requirement!

31
Q

How can one recover for a False Light tort?

A

Plaintiff must prove defendant:

1) Made public facts of plaintiff

2) In false light

3) Which would be highly offensive to reasonable person

Generally must show malice!

32
Q

How can one succeed in a misappropriation of the right to publicity tort?

A

Plaintiff shows that defendant:

1) Used plaintiffs name, likeness, identity without authorization

2) For defendant’s personal or commercial advantage

3) **Lack of consent*

4) Resulting in injury

33
Q

Can a dead person be defamed?

A

No!

34
Q

How do we determine the liability for airplane owners?

A

Modern trend is to apply negligence law.

Especially relevant when there are accidents where objects fall from the plan, or the airplane itself harms persons or objects on the ground.

35
Q

What are the requirements for negligence per se?

A

1) Criminal or regulatory statute that imposes duty for protection of others

2) Defendant violates statute by failing duty

3) Plaintiff is in class of people intended to be protected

4) Harm is type that statute was intended to protect against

36
Q

What are the requirements for res ipsa loquitur re: negligence?

A

1) Injury caused by instrumentality or agent with exclusive control

2) Accident was kind that would not happen absence negligence

3) Specific harm was not due on part of the plaintiff.

37
Q

What is the privilege of necessity with trespass cases?

A

Allows a person who intentionally enters and remains on another’s land (or interferes with personal property) to prevent serious harm, which is substantially more serious than the invasion or interference.

Private Necessity allows a defendant to protect their interest, as well as a limited amount of people, through reasonably necessary interference. However, property owner can still recover actual damages.

38
Q

Could the relationship between a psychotherapist and patient impose an affirmative duty to act on the psychotherapist?

A

Yes, as to the patient AND any third party’s when the patient makes credible threats of violence.

39
Q

When may a defendant use nondeadly force for the purposes of defending a third party?

A

Defendant reasonably believes:

1) Plaintiff is intentionally inflicting or about to inflict unprivileged force

2) Force defendant uses is proportionate

3) Defendant can prevent plaintiffs force or threat of force only be immediate use of force the defendant is employing.

40
Q

Is the owner of an animal strictly liable for the injuries caused by the animal if he does not have reason to know or does not know that it has dangerous propensities?

A

Yes, if such danger propensities are abnormal for the animals category or species.

41
Q

In regards to transferring liability to a subcontractor, does an employer always have a duty to maintain a safe work environment?

A

Yes! Even when the employer attempts to outsource things, it will not be relieved of liability for an improper workplace.

42
Q

What is the single intent rule?

A

Regarding battery, all that is required is a showing that the defendant intended to cause contact.

Not necessarily intended to cause physical injury!

MAJORITY RULE

43
Q

Is a mistake of fact defense applicable to trespass?

A

No, because the defendant need only the intent to enter the land, not necessarily the intent to transfer.

44
Q

What is the standard of care for medical physicians?

A

A national standard of care.

Any conduct that falls below the national standard is a breach of the standard of care.

45
Q

Does an exculpatory agreement or waiver bar an otherwise valid strict product liability claim?

A

No!

46
Q

May a service provider be subject to a strict product liability suit?

A

No!

47
Q

What is the standard of care held against a person with a mental disability in a negligence suit?

A

Reasonably prudent person with ordinary intelligence and knowledge.

48
Q

Regarding doctor’s failure to warn, when does a doctor not need too warn about the effects of a surgery?

A

1) Does not need to disclose commonly known risk

2) Patient waives or refuses information

3) Patient is incompetent (but doctor must attempt to get consent from guardian)

4) Disclosure would be detrimental to patient

49
Q

When may a natural condition of the land rise to the level of a nuisance?

A

Land creates a risk of imminent danger to plaintiff or property when:

1) Risk of harm is obvious/known to defendant

2) Defendant fails to take reasonable steps

AND

3) Natural condition causes substantial and unreasonable interference with plaintiff’s use on land

50
Q

What are the elements for false imprisonment?

A

A defendant is subject to liability to a plaintiff for false imprisonment if

(i) the defendant intends to confine the plaintiff
within a limited area

(ii) the defendant’s conduct causes the plaintiff’s confinement or the defendant fails to release the plaintiff from a confinement despite owing a duty to do so, and

(iii) the plaintiff is conscious of the confinement.

Plaintiff is not imprisoned if she willingly submits to confinement.

51
Q

What constitutes confinement re: false imprisonment?

A

The defendant may confine the plaintiff by the use of

1) Physical barriers

2) Physical force or restraint or the threat of physical force or restraint,

3) Duress other than by threat of physical force or restraint, or by the assertion of legal authority.

The defendant’s use of moral pressure or future threats does not constitute confinement or restraint by duress

52
Q

What is the standard of care for

  • Children?
  • Professionals?
  • Mental disabilities?
  • Physical disabilities?
A
  • Reasonable person of similar age, intelligence, experience
  • Same skill, knowledge, and care of another person with **similar intellectual disabilities*
  • Person with ordinary intelligence and knowledge
  • A reasonably careful person with same intellectual disability
53
Q

How may someone be liable under a dram-shop act?

A

1) Business sold alcohol to:

  • A minor

OR

  • Someone visibility intoxicated at time of sale

2) Plaintiffs injuries were a proximate cause of person’s intoxication

At common law, a social host is not liable under a dram shop act. Some JDXs allow it!

54
Q

For trespass, does it matter if the defendant does not know the property belongs to someone else?

A

No! What matters most is if the defendant intended to be on the property.

Knowledge NOT required!

55
Q

Can a defendant use reasonable force to stop a trespasser when the trespass was committed out of private necessity?

A

No!

Otherwise, defendant may generally use reasonable force to stop a trespass.

56
Q

Is a defendant who is properly applying self-defense liable for the harm to an unintentional bystander?

A

No! The person rightfully using self-defense is not subject to tort liability.

57
Q

How may a defendant avoid liability for a negligence per se theory, even if all elements are met?

A

If compliance with the statute or regulation would involve greater risk of physical injury to defendant or others.

Look for emergencies!

58
Q

What is the default rule regarding a plaintiff’s negligence on the MBE?

A

COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE!!!!

59
Q

When is a communication privileged for the purposes of defamation?

A

Defendant reasonably believes that:

1) Statement affects important interest of a third party

AND

2) Communicating statement is socially acceptable

  • i.e. the statement was asked for, not volunteered

Privilege does not apply when defendant knows it is false or recklessly disregards possibility.