Evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Regarding the Best Evidence Rule, when proving the contents of a writing, when is the originally writing not required?

A

1) All originals are lost or destroyed (unless destroyed in bad faith by proponent)

2) No original can be obtained via judicial process or procedure

3) Original is in possession of a party opponent; OR

4) Writing is not closely related to a controlling issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the spousal immunity privilege?

A

General rule is that the spouse of a **criminal defendant* may not be called as a witness, nor can they be compelled to testify.

[CA: Any proceeding, not just criminal cases!)

1) Witness spouse holds privilege

2) About events before and during marriage

3) Can only assert while married

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the marital communications privilege?

A

General rule that any communication made while married is privileged. Applies in civil an criminal cases.

1) Both spouses hold privilege

2) Only communications **during marriage*

3) May assert after marriage ends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When are leading questions permissible on direct?

A

When it is necessary to develop testimony. Usually comes up in:

1) Child witness

2) Age, Physical, or Mental Defect

3) Hostile Witness

4) Adverse Party

5) Associated with Adverse Party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Rule of Completeness?

A

Permits a party to compel the introduction of evidence that, in fairness, shold be considered at the same time as an admitted writing or recording statement.

This means that if fairness DOES NOT require introduction, the party will have to wait until their own case in chief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Does the Rule of Completeness apply to separate writings?

A

Yes; it can apply to a separate related writing, record statement, or photograph!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Dead Man’s Statute?

A

Prevents a surviving party of a contract form serving as a witness regarding any matter occurring before the death of the other party.

Has since been abolished under FRE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a sequestration and what must to court do when it is requested?

A

At party’s request, court must order **the exclusion of witness from the courtroom so they cannot hear testimony of other witnesses.

UNLESS there is an exception!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What parties are exempted from sequestration?

A

1) Parties

2) The crime victim, sometimes [ONLY APPLY IF EXPLICLITY TOLD]

3) FRE, the prosecutors lead investigator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Under the FRE, when does disclosure of a protected communication not operate as a waiver?

A

1) Disclosure was Inadvertent

2) Holder of privilege took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure

3) Holder promptly took steps to rectify, such as contacting disclosed party and *requesting return or destruction** of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does the photographer of a photo need to identify the photograph themselves?

A

No! Anyone can authenticate the photograph if they have personal knowledge and can provide proper foundation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When may a witness’s character be attacked as to their truthfulness or untruthfulness?

A

1) Credibility can be done by reputation or opinion

2) Testimony has to actually be probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the hearsay exception for learned treatises?

A

1) Statement contained in published treatises/book/article on subject of history, medicine, science, or art

2) Established as a reliable authority by witness, expert, or judicial notice

3) Expert relied on it during direct or it was brought to expert’s attention on cross.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Even if a statement meets the treatise hearsay exception, could the actual source (i.e. the book it comes from be introduced into evidence?

A

No!!!! The treatise itself, is not admitted into evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If evidence can come in as substantive evidence, may the same evidence come in for impeachment?

A

Yes!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is a defendant’s character trait admissible in a civil case?

What about in a criminal case?

A

Only if it is an essential element of a claim or defense. Otherwise, cannot use evidence to prove that defendant acted in conforming with character trait.

In contrast, criminal cases would permit the defendant to “open the door” by using such evidence on themselves!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are civil causes of actions where a defendant’s character is an essential element?

A

1) Defamation

2) Negligent Hiring

3) Negligent Child Care

4) Fraud

5) Negligent Entrustment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When may demonstrative evidence be used?

A

Can be used to

1) Prove contents of voluminous or confusing documents that cannot be conveniently examined in court

2) So long as party provides originals or duplicates to other party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the hearsay exception for a statement concerning a mental, emotional or physical condition?

A

Admissible if statement about declarant’s then existing:

1) State of Mind (motive, intent, plan)

2) Emotional, Sensory, Physical Condition (mental feeling, pain, bodily health)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Can you impeach a witness for untruthfulness through specific extrinsic bad acts?

A

No! You cannot impeach by extrinsic evidence of a specific instance of conduct!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When the defendant brings in evidence of a good character trait, must the trait actually be relevant to the cause of action?

A

Yes, the evidence must be relevant to the character trait at issue.

For example, if I am being tried for battery, evidence that I am a truthful person is irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When may a final judgment of conviction not be excluded as hearsay?

A

If the judgment was entered after trial.

Does not apply to acquittals!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

If the government choses to prosecute a witness who provided incriminating testimony, but was given use immunity, what must they do?

A

Government must demonstrate that the compelled testimony did not provide an investigatory lead to the prosecution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

May a party introduce evidence that is relevant to the weight and credibility of other admitted evidence, even if the judge has already decided he evidence is admissible?

A

Yes! A party can seek the discredit the credibility of admitted evidence, even if the judge says it is admissible.

Remember, judge determines admissibility; jury decides weight!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Can evidence be admitted on the condition that proof to the evidence’s relevancy would be admitted later?

A

Yes! Court may admit proposed evidence on the condition that proof to relevancy be introduced later.

AKA Conditional Relevancy!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

IWhen does the dying declaration hearsay exception apply?

A

1) In civil cases

2) In criminal homicide cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

When a defendant opens the door re: their character, may the prosecution attack the defendant’s character with specific bad acts?

A

No!

Just do so through reputation or opinion testimony.

In contrast, a prosecution may do so to a **character witness*…but not the defendant themselves!

28
Q

What is the requirements evidence that describes someone’s habit?

A

The evidence has to be sufficiently specific!

29
Q

May demonstratives and experiments be excluded if they result in undue waste of time or confusion of the issues?

A

Yes!

In general, court may still allow such demonstrations and experiments in the courtroom.

30
Q

What is a motion for acquittal?

A

A motion where the party believes there is insufficient evidence to support any element of charged crime.

31
Q

Can you impeach hearsay declarants?

A

Yes; if a hearsay declarant’s statements are brought in under an exception, they are impeachable.

32
Q

How may a witness be impeached for an inconsistent statement?

A

Only if the statement is provided the opportunity to explain or deny the statement.

AND that the opposing party may question them.

33
Q

Non-Hearsay: Statement by Declarant Witness

A

Out of court statement admissible if witness subject to cross-examination, and prior statement:

1) Is inconsistent with current testimony and made under penalty of perjury

2) Is consistent with current testimony and offered to i) rebut charge of improper influence; ii) rehabilitate witness

OR

3) Identifies person perceived earlier

34
Q

Does the ACR protect communications that are incidental to the legal representation?

A

No!

Includes things like communication about legal fees!

35
Q

May evidence that impeaches a witness be used as substantive evidence?

A

Yes, if the question goes towards a material fact or issue!

36
Q

May a part testify as to the contents of a document at issue when the document is actually available?

A

No! Must produce the document.

This includes with opposing has the document, but provides it.

37
Q

When are juvenile convictions admissible for impeachment purposes?

A

Civil Trial: Never admissible.

Criminal Trial: Permissible against a witness, but not the accused.

38
Q

May a judge take judicial notice of an adjudicative fact?

A

Yes!

An adjudicative fact is one that relates to the parties, activities, and the case at hand.

39
Q

May the court consider privileged evidence in making preliminary findings of fact?

A

No!

However, they otherwise do not need to follow the FRE.

40
Q

Is consent a valid defense against statutory rape?

A

No!

41
Q

For spousal immunity to apply, does it matter that the witness spouse is testifying in a proceeding when the other spouse is not a defendant?

A

No!

Applies to any proceeding! Even if other spouse is not a party or defendant!

42
Q

When is a witness’s prior consistent statement admissible?

A

For two purposes:

1) To show that statement was made before defendant has reason to fabricate/had improper influence or motive

2) To rehabilitate on another ground

43
Q

When is the judgmenet of a defendant’s prior conviction admissible under hearsay?

A

When the crime was punishable by death or imprisonment of 1 year!

44
Q

What types of evidence are self-authenticating and therefore do not need a supporting witness?

A

1) Public documents with officials signature and certification/seal

2) Certified copies of public reports and records of regularly conducted activities

3) Newspapers, periodicals, and official publications

4) Documents with trade inspection

5) Acknowledged documents

6) Commercial paper with signature and related documents

45
Q

What is the hearsay exception to ** records?**

A

Out o court statements are admissible for truth if:

1) Concerns personal or family history

2) Are regularly kept records of a religious organization

46
Q

When may bases of an expert witness be admitted, even if otherwise admissible?

A

Otherwise inadmissible facts/data may be admitted if:

Probative value in helping jury evaluate opinion SUBSTANTIALLY OUTWEIGHS prejudicial effect

47
Q

Can evidence that a witness was offered or obtained immunity be used to impeach them for bias?

A

Yes!

Contrasts policy concerns regarding compromise offers, negotiations, or plea deals.

48
Q

What does the attorney client privilege protect from being admitted into evidence?

A

Protects

1) Confidential communications

2) Made to an attorney

3) For the purpose of obtaining legal services

49
Q

May a party ask the jury to adopt an adverse inference as to a party’s invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination?

A

Civil Trial: Yes

*Criminal Trial**: No

50
Q

Hearsay: Party-Opponent Agent or Employee Statement

A

Admissible if:

1) Offered against party opponent

2) Made by party’s agent or employee

3) WAS RELATED to matter within scope of relationship.

51
Q

What is a preliminary hearing?

A

Court must decide preliminary questions of fact **as to admissibility of evidence, privilege, or witness qualification.

Process:

1) Both parties present evidence

2) Outside presence of jury if

  • Involves admissibility of confession
  • Defendant in criminal case is a witness or so requests
  • Justice so required; i.e. prejudice

3) Judge is bound by privilege

52
Q

When is evidence of a juvenile conviction permissible?

A

1) To impeach a witness for motive to lie or bias

2) To impeach a criminal defendant for truthfulness if:

  • Conviction would be admissible if it were committed by an adult
  • Necessary to fairly determine guilt or innocent
53
Q

Must a proponent of a self-authenticating document advance notice to an adverse party?

A

Generally, no.

However, they are required to give them prior written notice of the intent to show a business record!

54
Q

May statements made in settlement negotiations be admitted to show bias against a non-party witness?

A

Yes!

55
Q

Does it matter whether settlement negotiations reached an agreement re: the admissibility of statements made?

A

No!

56
Q

What are noncharacter purposes for admitting a prior crime or bad act?

A

1) Motive

2) Intent

3) Absence of Mistake

4) Identity

5) Common plan or scheme

6) Knowledge of crime

7) Opportunity

8) Consciousness of Guilt

9) Pattern

57
Q

When is redirect permitted?

A

Generally, only when cross-examination raises significant new matters.

Therefore, not entitled to re-direct to:

1) Reiterate information

2) Rely on general, non-new matters addressed on cross

58
Q

What will a court do if a privileged communication was disclosed in state court and is now being offered in federal court?

A

The federal court will review both sets of laws.

The law that offers more protect is the one that controls.

59
Q

What is the hearsay exception for property interests?

A

Statements in documents that affect a property interest are excepted from hearsay if:

1) Matter stated was relevant to document’s purpose

2) Later dealings with property do not contradict truth of statement

60
Q

When may a witness authenticate someone’s voie?

A

At anytime.

This is true even if they only became familiar with the voice for the purposes of litigation.

61
Q

May an expert witness provide an opinion as to whether a defendant

  • Lacks mental state?
  • Meets element of claim or defense?
A

No! That is for the jury.

62
Q

May evidence involving crimes of sexual assault or child molestation be admitted for propensity?

A

Yes! Allowed in civil and criminal cases.

Permitted for any relevant purpose if the case involves sexual assault and child molestation.

63
Q

When may a conviction for a felony or crime of dishonesty be admitted to challenge someone’s truthfulness?

A

Can be

  • Intrinsically
  • Extrinsically!
64
Q

MBE TIP: What should you do when you see an evidence question where the answer is about whether the testimony is speculative?

A

Ignore it! Because there is not requirement a witness be absolutely certain of matters they testify too.

65
Q

Is evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s **routine practice admissible for propesnity?

A

Yes! Can be proven by evidence of :

  • SICs
  • Testimony of someone with personal knowledge
66
Q

When is a statement against interest in a criminal trial with co-defendants admissible?

A

1) In general, statements against interest in a criminal case that exposes criminal liability require corroborating circumstances.

2) Then, if it’s in a co-defendant trial, the statement will be excluded if it is testimonial under the Confrontation Clause.

  • If it isn’t, it’s admissible!
67
Q

What evidence is testimonial?

A

Any evidence if it was made primarily for use in a criminal investigation.

Inadmissible, unless:

  • Declarant unavailable for trial
  • Defendant had prior opportunity to cross.