torts Flashcards
(44 cards)
Is emotional distress and mental anguish sufficient damages for privacy actions?
Yes, even without public disclosure of private things to a third party
T/F: Intrusion is the only form of invasion of privacy that does not require publication
T
For private nuisance actions unreasonableness will be found if
the severity of the inflicted injury outweighs the utility of the D’s conduct
T/F: a person can be strictly liable for abnormally dangerous activity when the harm does not arise out of those activities
F, the harm must result from the kind of danger anticipated – it must flow from the abnormally dangerous activity
T/F: determining whether an activity is abnormally dangerous is a question for the jury to decide
F - it is a question of law so the court must decide
What are the elements of conversion?
- an act by D interfering with P’s right of possession in chattel
- intent to perform the act bringing about the interference
- causation
- damages
For conversion, does the person need to have intent to trespass
No, only intent to do the act that caused the interference
for conversion, if conduct is innocent is the person liable?
Yes, good faith is irrelevant
An substantial interference that interferes with specialized use of land is
Not considered enough for private nuisance
Efforts to protect a person or property is a ____ force
foreseeable
Negligence of rescuers is a ____ force
foreseeable
A subsequent disease is a ___ force
foreseeable
negligence uses what kind of standard?
objective standard - reasonably prudent person
What standard of care are children engaged in potentially dangerous adult activities
An adult standard of care
What duty is owed to a licensee
a duty to warn or make safe hazardous conditions that are known and or concealed
what duty is owed to invitees
duty to warn or make safe hazardous conditions that are known and or concealed or could be discovered by a reasonable inspection
what is the attractive nuisance doctrine?
must avoid a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm to children caused by dangerous artificial conditions on their property
how can you establish the attractive nuisance doctrine?
- showing a dangerous condition is on the land that the owner is or should be aware of
- the owner knows or should know that children might trespass
- the condition is likely to cause injury
- the expense of remedying the situation is slight compared with the magnitude of risk
conduct that was not consented to =
offensive conduct
T/F: The duty to warn extends to dangerous conditions that the licensee should reasonably have discovered
F
Does a landlord’s duty to her tenants also extend to her tenant’s guests?
Yes
what liability when someone trespasses someone’s land under necessity
If a private necessity you are still liable for damages you create
Necessity
avoid threatening injury from a natural or other force that is substantially more serious than the invasion of property
Private necessity
benefits a limited number of people