Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Torts liabillity

A

Breach a duty owed, causation, damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duty

A

An individual owes a duty of care if the plaintiff is in the zone of danger (is a forseeable plaintiff). Assume forseeabilty unless extreme facts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reasonable person standard

A

Reasonably prudent person under same or similar circumstances. The reasonable person follows rules and is careful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Professional duty of care

A

A professional with above average skill or knowledge will be based on what a reasonably prudent person with their greater skill or knowledge would have done. They must posess and exercise knowledge and skill of an ordinary member of the profession in good standing. (the profession sets the standard of care e.g. licesning board).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Informed consent

A

A doctor has a duty to provide enough information about risks so a patient can make an informed decision about whether to proceed. Any risk that would cause a rasonable person to decline treatment if disclosed, must be disclosed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Physical Disability duty

A

Includes some subjectivity. Duty of care based on person with that disability under the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Child duty of care

A

Children owe a duty of care for a child of like age, inteligence, and experience. If they are engaging in an adult activity, they are held to an adult standard. (e.g. if the activity is potentially dangerous even when an adult is doing it).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Landowners

A

Owners and occupiers. The land is the physical structure and surrounding land. A harm can arise from activity or conditions on the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Landowner duty of care to undiscovered trespasser

A

No duty. Undiscovered trespasser includes those you anticipate will be on the land e.g. someone who regularly takes a shortcut.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Landowner duty of care to Discovered trespasser

A

Owe duty of care to warn of a manmade death trap (not natural) that is known to landowner and likely to cause death or serous bodily injury. It must be a trap (concealed) and serious (not slippery floor).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Landowner duty of care owed to a licensee (guest)

A

A licensee comes for their own purposes or their business. Includes social guests. The condition must be concealed dangerous condition that is known to owner/occupier. A slippery floor counts if owner/occupier knows of it. First responders are licensees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Landowner duty of care owed to invitee

A

Landowner owes a duty to inspect for dangerous conditions (reasonable care) for an invitee. Land is held open to the public for business purposes. Must warn and inspect.
Courts will check for inspection frequency. A warning is enough to avoid liablity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Modern landowner duty

A

Only use trespasser/invited guest distinction. All invited guests get reasonable care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Statutory duty of care/ Negligence per se

A

A plaintiff may only recover if the statute was intended to protect the same class of persons as the plaintiff and from the same type of harm.

Negligence per se is violating a duty and breach through a statutory violation.

Ask: Does the statute apply? Is the violation of the statute excused?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duty: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

A

P may recover in a near miss case where the D almost injures P who physically feared for life and suffers physical consequences. P must show they were in the zone of danger and suffered some physical symptom.

Sees harm of a close family member: P must have witnessed close family member issued by D’s negligence.

NIED caused by D who has a business or high risk relationship with P and run significant risk if IED if they act negligently. E.g. incorrect doctor diagnoses of terminal illness, morge mishandles remains. (most states don’t require physical harm in this case. )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Affirmative duty to act

A

There is no informative duty to act. But, there is a duty to assist if you have a special relationship with person in distress (parent, child, employer, innkeeper, or contract relationship).
There is a duty to act to prevent someone under your authority from harming someone else if you ahve ability to do so.

You do have a duty to assist when you caused someone to get hurt. Once you act, you have duty to do so with reasonable care. Reasonable emergency situation is distinct from nonemergency.

17
Q

Forseeability: rescuers

A

Rescuers are always forseeable plaintiff. Danger invites rescue.

18
Q

Breach of duty

A

Breach of duty is a fact question for the jury and will often be seen in mx for summary judgment, judgment at law, or directed verdict.

19
Q

Breach of duty Res ipsa loquitor

A

Inference of breach. (1) accident would not normally occur absent negligence; (2) D is the responsible party because the harmful object was under control of D. It is unreasonable under the cirucmstances to require P to prove the evidence if the evidence is in the D’s control.

20
Q

Causation : Need actual and proximate

A

Must prove sufficient connection between breach and injury.

21
Q

Actual cause

A

Cause in fact. If it were not for D’s breach of duty, injury wouldn’t occur. (but for).

22
Q

Actual cause - merged cause (joint and several)

A

Both D’s can be fully liable. Either D could cause the injury. But if their conduct was a substantial factor in causing harm, they are deemd the actual cause. If the negligent conduct could cause the harm itself, it is substantial. (e.g. pollution).

On essay state “D’s negligent conduct was AN actual cause of the plaintiff’s injury.

23
Q

Actual cause - unknown cause

A

Multiple Ds, unknown cause. Shifts the burden to D to prove it wasn’t them.

24
Q

Actual cause - no cause

A

No cause because P cannot show that both or all D’s breached. Can’t shift the burden to D’s in that case.

25
Q

PRoximate cause

A

The P was near enough, in the zone of danger. Injury was forseeable consequence of D’s breach. If there was a significant risk the particular harm would occur and it did, then it is likely the proximate cause.

26
Q

PRoximate cause direct cause

A

Harm is almost always forseeable because there is an unterupted chain of events.

27
Q

Proximate cause indirect cause

A

After D’s negligent conduct, some other force comes into play and the force was not a forseeable consequence of D’s conduct. (An intervening force).

Always forseeable intervening force: subsequent medical malpractice errors; negligent rescue (danger invites rescue); raction forces e.g. fleeing in danger, subsequent accident or disease.

28
Q

Proximate cause - questionable types of intervening forces

A

(1) negligent conduct by 3rd party; (2) intentional torts or crimes by 3rd parties; (3) natural forces e.g. Acts of God - act of God does not cut off off liability if it was forseeable.

Plaintiff’s negligent conduct is NEVER an intervening force. Only address in defense. If asks for mx of summary judgment, if there is a forseeable issue is unclear like one of these then deny motion and let jury decide.

29
Q

Damages in negligent action.

A

P can recover all economic, medical, lost of earnings, and pain and suffering.

30
Q

Economic damages

A

medical expenses, learning loss. Damage to property is the total amount of FMV if destoyed, or the repair amount to damaged property.

31
Q

Noneconomic damages

A

pain and suffering, emotional distress. No emotional distress available for property damages. E.g. dog killed.

32
Q

Punitive damages

A

Only available for intentional or reckless actions, not merely negligent actions.

33
Q

Eggshell skull plaintiff

A

Take victim as you find them. D is liable for full extent of harm even if it is an unforseeable extent.

34
Q

Defense Contributory negligence

A

Traditional rule: P fails to use relevent standard of care to protect self from forseeable risks of harm. It is a total bar to recovery. Most states no longer uses this. Puts burden on the last party who could avoid the harm.

35
Q

Assumption of risk

A

Used to be a total bar to recovery. P assumes risk when they know of the risk and voluntarily assumed it. E.g. signed a waiver. Sometimes participation itself is enough through implied assumption of risk. Must be a choice with a feasible alternative.

36
Q

Comparative negligence: Partial and pure

A

Almost all states use this now.
Partial comparative negligence: P can’t recover if more at fault than D. IF less at fault, then P can recover but recovery reduced by % at fault.

Pure comparative: (always apply on MBE unless says otherwise). Recover regardless of % fault but limited by %. IF both P and D recover, net them. E.g. 100k damage. 70% P, 30% D fault. D recovers 70k - 30k = 40k.

If the risk was known courts limit D’s duty so they don’t have a duty to protect unless conduct was egregious.