Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Torts

Analytical Approach

A

Overall Approach
1. Divide first by parties, THEN
2. Within each party/group, in order, list each tort and the appropriate defenses

When Call of Question Focuses of Defense or Specific Issue
* Start by discussing the relevant cause of action in full, THEN
* use separate major headings for each call of the question–answer all specifically

Discuss defenses only after discussing all the torts by a particular party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Torts - Vicarious Liability

Vicarious Liability

Guidelines/Analytical Approach

A

This is an agency issue that comes up in Torts
.
Discuss VL before analyzing the torts (unless otherwise directed by the call of the question)
.
1. the principal is only liable if. . .
2. detour v. frolic
3. [employee tort analysis]

Employee Negligence
Principals are vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees while the employee is acting within the scope of their agency.

Principals are liable for employees’ negligent acts when the act was a detour from their agency, but not when it is a frolic.
.
Independent Contractor
Principals are not generally liable for the torts of independent contractors, UNLESS
1. The independent contractor is engaged in inherently dangerous activities, OR
2. The duty is nondelegable
.
Inherently Dangerous Activity generally refers to blasting

Nondelegable duty generally means maintenance of something (like a car or floors etc)
.
Intentional Torts
A Principal is liable for the intentional torts of agents (employees and independent contractors IF
1. force is authorize by employment,
2. friction is generated by employement, OR
3. the agent is furthering the business of the principal AND acting with express, implied, or apparent authority

.
Agent Liability
Not a Defense for Agent
An employee is not absolved of liability simply because the employer is also liable, they are generally both liable
.
Agent Liable to Principal in Indemnity
Under common law, employees are liable to the plaintiff AND liable to the principal in indemnity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

General Requirements

A

All intentional torts require:
1. Volitional Act
2. Intent to do the act (not necessarily the harm)
3. Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Intent

A

Intentional torts require intent to bring about the forbidden consequence, not the intent to cause the tort itself or the particular harm
.
Transferred intent applies where the defendant intends to commit a tort against one person but instead:

  1. commits a different tort against the same person,
  2. commits the same tort against a different person, OR
  3. commits a different tort against a different person

In which case, the intent to commit a tort against one person is transferred to the other tort or injured person for the purpose of establishing a prima facie intentional tort

Applies to FIVE Torts:

  1. Assault
  2. Battery
  3. False Imprisonment
  4. Trespass
  5. Trespass to Chattels
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Causation

A

Defendant’s act must be the cause of plaintiff’s harm.

Proximate cause is generally not an issue with intentional harm.

Factual cause is established where defendant’s conduct is a substantial factor in bringng about plaintiff’s injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Assault

Factors

A

To establish a prima facie case for assault, there must be:
1. a volitional act
2. with intent to cause either
* harmful or offensive contact, OR
* apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact,
3. that actually or proximately causes the reasonable apprehension of harmful or offensive contact.

NOTE: Actual harm is not required for nominal or punitive damages
.
Reasonable Apprehension
1. An immediate expectation of physical contact (not limited to fear)
2. That is reasonable (not exaggerated fears of contact–ignore hypersensitivity)
3. The plaintiff is aware of the threat from defendant
4. Defendant has the apparent ability to commit battery
5. More than just words alone (but words can negate a reasonable apprehension)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Battery

A

To establish a prima facie case for battery, there must be:
1. a volitional act
2. with intent to cause either
* harmful or offensive contact, OR
* apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact,
3. that actually or proximately causes harmful or offensive contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Offensive & Harmful Contact

Offensive Contact

A

Offensive Contact
Contact is offensive if it would be offensive to a reasonable person (objective test).

Contact is only offensive if it has not been permitted.

NOTE: there is implied consent to the ordinary contact of everyday life (not unreasonable)
.
Harmful Contact
Actual injury, pain, or disfigurement.

Includes even the slightest physical change in condition
.
Indirect Contact
1. Causing contact with something else (Ex. Forcing someone to move out of your way and then they get hurt)
2. Causing contact with an item in close physical connection (Ex. hitting something out of someone’s hand without actually touching them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

False Imprisonment

A

To establish a prima facie case of false imprisonment, there must be:
1. an act intending to confine someone within boundaries fixed by the actor
2. directly or indirectly resulting in confinement, AND
3. the confined person is either aware of or harmed by the confinement.

.
Confinement
To constitute confinement, there must be no reasonable means of escape.
.
Includes:
1. Denial of the means to leave the boundaries set by the defendant,
2. Threats of immediate force,
3. Failure to release the plaintiff while under a duty to do so (Ex. cab driver)
4. Invalid use of legal authority (False Arrest)

.
Does NOT Include:
* moral pressure or future threats.
* length of time is irrelevant
* walls are not required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Trespass to Chattels & Conversion

Prima Facie Factors, Requirement, & Remedial Options

A

To establish a prima facie case for trespass to chattels or conversion, there must be:
1. An act of intermeddling (directly damaging) OR dispossession (depriving the right of possession,
1. Of the personal property of another
1. That causes harm to, or the loss of use of, the personal property.

Requires: Actual Damage required.
* Dispossession = Damage.
* No dispossession = must have actual damage to chattel

Does NOT Require: Intent to trespass (can be mistake)

Remedies: Damages or Replevin. Restitution in conversion when chattel is sold to another.
.
Conversion
Conversion requires that the intereference be serious enough to warrant requiring the defendant to pay the full value of the chattel at the time of conversion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Conversion

A

Conversion requires that the intereference be serious enough to warrant requiring the defendant to pay the full value of the chattel at the time of conversion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

A

Establishing a prima facie case for IIED requires:
1. An act that constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct
2. That caused severe emotional distress
.

Extreme & Outrageous Conduct
Extreme and outrageous conduct is conduct that trancends the bounds of all human decency.

Conduct not normally considered extreme and outrageous may be considered extreme and outrageous if it is:
1. Continous in nature
2. Commited by a certain kind of defendant, OR
3. Directed towards a certain kind of plaintiff (Ex. Children, elderly, persons with known sensitivities)

.
Third Party IIED
To establish a prima facie case of third party IIED:
1. The third party must be present when the injury occured
2. The distress resulted in bodily harm OR the plaintiff is a close relative of the third party, AND
3. The defendant was aware of these facts.

.
Damages Requirement
Actual damages are required (no nominal damages)

The more outrageous the conduct, the less proof of damages needed.

Physical harm is not required (only required for NIED)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Abuse of Process

A

To establish a prima facie case of abuse of process, there must be:
1. Use of a legitimate civil process (service, filing of complaint, discovery, etc)
2. For a wrongful purpose (harassment, waste time, etc), AND
3. An act or threat against the plaintiff to accomplish the wrongful prupose.

The purpose is to prohibit any use of any form of process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Torts - Intentional Torts

Malicious Prosecution

A

To establish a prima facie case for malicious prosecution, there must be

  1. Initiation of civil, administrative, or criminal proceedings
  2. Without Probable Cause
  3. for a wrongful purpose, and
  4. the favorable termination of the proceedings on the merits in favor of the current plaintiff.

.

Favorable Termination

  • Includes dismissal with prejudice.
  • Is satisfied when the malicious prosecution ends favorably for the nonmalicious party
    .

Biggest Defense: Attack probable cause
.

Lawyer Liability: The lawyer may be held liable if no reasonable attorney would sue on the basis of the claim brought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Consent

Umbrella Rule, Scope, & Capacity to Consent

A

Plaintiffs consent to Defendant’s conduct is a defense.
.
The majority view is that one cannot consent to a crime.
.
.
Scope of Consent
Defendant may be liable if they exceeded the scope of consent given to them.
.
.
Capacity to Consent
Those **without capacity ** are deemed incapable of consent (drunks, very young children, etc)
Those with limited capacity can consent to things within the scope of their understanding (older children, mentally disabled persons, etc)
.
Express Consent
Defendant is not liable if Plaintiff expressly consents to Defedant’s conduct, UNLESS

  1. Plaintiff was mistaken and Defendant knowingly took advantage
  2. Consent was induced by fraud regarding an essential matter (not collateral); OR
  3. Consent was obtained by duress (not including economic duress or future threats).

.
Apparent Consent
Apparent consent is consent that a reasonable person would infer from custom and usage or Plantiff’s conduct

.
Consent Implied by Law
Consent is implied by law when the action is necessary to save a person’s life or some other important interest in persons or property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Protective Privileges

List

A
  1. Self Defense
    • Initial Aggressor
    • Third Party Injuries
    • Mistake
    • Reasonably Necessary Force
  2. Defense of Others
  3. Defense of Property
    • Hot Pursuit
    • Privilege
    • Reasonable Force
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Protective Privilege:
Self-Defense

Umbrella Rule & List

A

If Defendant reasonably believes Defendant is being attacked or is about to be attacked, they may use force reasonably necessary to defend themselves.
.

Majority Rule: No duty to retreat
.

Modern Trend: Duty to retreat before using deadly force if it can be done safely (unless Defendant is in their own home)
.

Subrules
1. Initial Aggressor
2. Third-Party Injuries
3. Mistake
4. Reasonably Necessary Force

.
Initial Aggressor
The protective privilege of self-defense is not available to the initial aggressor, UNLESS the other party responds to the initial aggressor’s nondeadly force with deadly force.
.

Third-Party Injuries
The protective privilege of self-defense is available to the defendant when they injure a third person while trying to defend themselves.
(Third person uses transferred intent)
.

Mistake
The protective privilege of self-defense may be available where the defendant was reasonably mistaken as to the existence of danger.
(applies also to the defense of others)
.

Reasonably Necessary Force
Reasonably necessary force includes deadly force only when necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Protective Privilege:
Defense of Others

A

A person may use force to defend another person if they reasonably believe the other pwerson could have used force to defend themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Protective Privilege:
Defense of Property

A

A person may use reasonable force to prevent a tort against their personal or real property, BUT must first request to desist or leave, UNLESS it would clearly by futile or dangerous.
.
.
A person may use deadly force to defend property ONLY when there is a serious threat of bodily harm, which extends to deadly mechanical devices or traps.
.
.
Subrules
1. Hot Pursuit
2. Privilege
3. Reasonable Force

.
Hot Pursuit
Hot pursuit cannot be used as a defense if the tort has already been committed
.
However an owner can use force while in hot pursuit of another who tortiously dispossessed chattel because the tort is still ongoing while the tortfeasor is fleeing.

An owner can only use peaceful means to recapture chattels if their own possession began lawfully
.
Priviliege
Defense is not available to a person with privilege, necessity, recapture of chattles, etc.. (Supersedes right to defend land).
.
Reasonable Force
A person can use reasonable force but cannot use deadly force to defend property UNLESS invasion of privacy also entails serious threat of bodily harm. Extends to deadly mechanical devices or traps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Defenses to False Imprisonment

A

Shopkeeper Privilege

  1. A shopkeeper
  2. With reasonable grounds to believe a person has committed theft
  3. May detain a person
  4. For the purpose of making an investigation
    • for a reasonable time and
    • in a reasonable manner (no deadly force)

.
.
Crime Prevention (by a Private Person)
.
Misdemeanor
Private persons may arrest someone for misdemeanor if

  1. They have a reasonable belief that a crime has occured that involves a breach of the peace, AND
  2. IT has been committed in their presence

.
Felony
Private persons may arrest someone for felony if they have reasonable grounds for believing the felony has been committed.
(no in the presence requirement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Torts - Defenses to Intentional Torts

Necessity

A

A person may interefere with personal or real property of another when reasonably and apparently necessary in an emergency to avoid injury from natural or other force which would be substantially more serious than the evasion taken to evade it.
.
.
Public Necessity
Public necessity is a complete defense when it is to avert an imminent public disaster
.
.
Private Necessity
Private necessity may be a defense to an intentional tort when the action was taken to prevent serious harm to a limited number of persons.
The actor must still pay for injury caused, UNLESS the act was to benefit the property owner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Torts - Negligence

Umbrella Rule

A

To establish a prima facie case for negligence, the plaintiff must show:
1. Duty
2. Breach
3. Actual Cause
4. Proximate Cause
5. Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Torts - Negligence

Duty

List

A
  1. Default Duty of Care
  2. Children
  3. Professionals
  4. Possessors of Land
  5. Special Duty Issues
  6. NIED
24
Q

Torts - Negligence

Default Duty of Care

A

When a person engages in an activity, they owe to foreseeable plaintifffs a duty of care to act as a reasonably prudent person
.
Mental Deficiency; Physical Characteristics; Superior Skills
Although mental deficiencies and inexperience are not considered,
Physical characteristics (blindness) can be considered relevant.
Persons with superior skills are required to exercise it
.
Unforseeable Plaintiffs
If the plaintiff is not a foreseeable plaintiff (not in the “danger zone” of the negligent act), discuss the Cardozo/Andrews split under duty:
* Majority View: Under Cardozo’s view, the duty of care is owed to foreseeable plaintiffs–those who are in the **zone of danger **of the negligent act
* Minority View: Under Andrew’s view, the duty of care is owed to anyone, and foreseeability is an issuer of whether policy or other considerationsmake the chain of causation too attenuated to be foreseeable.
* Unforseeable Harm: Discuss unforeseeable plaintiffs in duty. Discuss unforseeable harm in proximate cause.

.
Criminal Act
Generally, there is no duty to foresee a criminal act unless breach of duty itself forseeably increases risk of criminal act occurring
.
Multiple Types of Duty
Possible to discuss multiple types of duty. Discuss all applicable duties after the ordinary duty under the duty header.
.
Specific Duty
Not enough to say “defendant had a duty to act responsibly, instead say: “defendant had duty to drive vehicle reasonably to avoid injuring drivers, pedestrians, or property

25
# Torts - Negligence Duty: Children
Children are held to standard of a child like **age**, **intelligence**, and **experience** (subjective test). However, child engaged in **potentially dangerous adult activites** (operating motor vehicle) may be held to an adult standard of care. Children under the **age of five** generally do **not** have the capacity to be negligent.
26
# Torts - Negligence Duty: Professionals
A professional is required to possess knowledge and skill of the **average member** of the profession/occupation in **good standing**. **Physicians** Most courts apply a national standard of care to evaluate their conduct. Physicians have a **duty to disclose** risks of treatment. It is sufficient to enable the patient to give informed consent. It is **breached** if the risk is serious enough that a **reasonable person** in patient's position would have withheld consent on learning risk.
27
# Torts - Negligence Duty: Possessors of Land
Discuss this duty when plaintiff is **injured** by **dangerous conditions** on someone else's property. When plaintiff is injured by an **activity** on defendant's land --> **ordinary standard of care** . Duty to: 1. Persons _Off_ Premises 2. Persons _On_ Preferences . **Active Operations** For all classifications, the duty of **reasonable care** is applied to **activities on the land** . **Attractive Nuisance** Landowner has a duty to exercise **ordinary care** to avoid a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm to children caused by artificial conditions on their property if: 1. The landowner **knows or should know** of the dangerous condition 2. The landoner **knows _children_ frequent the area** 3. The condition is **likely to cause harm** (it is dangerous due to childrens' **inability to appreciate risk**, _AND_ * 4. The **expense of remedy** is **slight**compared to the **level of risk**
28
# Torts - Duty: Possessors of Land **Persons _Off_ Premises**
Generally, a landowner owes **no duty** to protect someone outside the premises from either natural or artificial conditions on the land, _EXCEPT_: **Natural Conditions Exception- Trees:** Duty to maintain trees so they do not cause harm to persons off the premises . **Artificial Conditions Exceptions:** Exceptions for artificial conditions include 1. Duty to protect from **unreasonably dangerous artificial conditions,** and 2. Duty to take **precautions to protect passersby** from dangerous conditions
29
# Torts - Negligence Duty: Possessors of Land **Persons _On_ Premises**
The owner/possessor of land owes a duty to those on the premises **depending on the classification** of the person coming onto the land. . **Classifications** 1. Invitees 2. Licensees 3. Trespassers . **Invitees** An invitee is on the premises for the **business purpose** of the **owner/possessor**. *Duty to Invitee* The possessor/owner owes a duty to invitee to **inspect**, **discover**, **repair**, and **protect** against **known or discoverable dangers** _IF_ the owner/possessor: 1. **Knows** or by reasonable inspection **should have discovered** the dangerous condition 2. Should realize it involves an **unreasonable risk of harm** _AND_ 3. Should expect invitee will **not discover/realize the danger** _OR_ will **fail to protect themself** against it. . **Licensees** A licensee is on the premises for their own purpose, rather than for the possessor's benefit (Social Guests). *Duty to Licensee* The possessor/owner owes a duty to a licensee to exercise **reasonable care** to **make the condition safe** _OR_ **warn of the condition** and risk if the possessor/owner: 1. **Knows** or **has reason to know** of the condition 2. Should realize it involves an **unreasonable risk of harm** 3. Should expect invitee will **not discover/realize the danger**, _AND_ 4. Licensees **do not know** or **do not have reason to know** of the condition/risk involved. ***Solictors:*** Solicitors and licensees unless you have a no trespassing or no soliciting sign or a locked gate. . **Trespassers** A trespasser is on the property without the consent of the owner/possessor *Duty to Trespassers* The possessor/owner's duty to trespassers only extends to **artificial dangerous conditions** * **Known/Anticipated Trespassers:** Duty to adequately warn of **highly dangerous** (involving risk of serious bodily harm or death) **artificial conditions** _created_ or _maintained_ by the owner/possessor that are **non-obvious/concealed** _AND_ **known** by the owner/possessor. * **Unknown Trespassers:** The duty is limited to not engaging in **wanton** or **willfull harmful conduct** | only give the rule for the applicable classification
30
# Torts - Negligence Special Duty Issues
**Firefighter's Rule** Firefighters, police, and other first responders are **prohibited** from recovering for injuries caused by the **special risks** of doing their job. . **Rescuers** Defendant is liable to a rescuer who is injured during a rescue if the **defendant's negligence** put either defendant or third persons in the position of requiring rescue. Rescuers are **foreseeable** because danger invites rescue. . **Common Carriers** Common carriers (railroads, airlines, etc) owe a **hightened duty** to use the **highest degree of care**to aid and assist **their passengers** . **Custom** Custom or usage in an industry or trade may be introduced as evidence of a duty or lack of duty. . **Generally No Duty of Affirmative Action** Generally, there is no duty to act or rescue _EXCEPT_: 1. **Special Relationship** (Parents, innkeepers, common carriers, shopkeepers, etc.) 2. **Peril Due to Own Conduct** 3. **Assumption of Duty** (Applies once a person starts taking rescue action) 4. **Duty to Prevent Harm by Third Persons** One who (1) has actual ability and authority to control someone's actions, _AND_ (2) knows or should know the person is likely to commit acts that would require exercise of this control
31
# Torts - Negligence Duty: NIED
Generally, there is no duty to prevent emotional distress _UNLESS_ plaintiff suffers **physical harm** To establish a **duty** the plaintiff usually must: 1. Be within the **zone of danger** _AND_ 2. Suffer **physical symptoms** from the emotional distress . **Exceptions (Doesnt Require Danger Zone or Physical Symptoms** 1. Plaintiff and victim are **closely related** + Plaintiff was **present** + Plaintiff **perceived** the injury 2. The duty arises from a **special relationship** between plaintiff and defendant, so the negligence has **great potential** to cause emotional distress (physician and patient) 3. Defendant mishandles relative's **corpse** 4. Defendant **erroneously states** a relative has died
32
# Torts - Negligence Breach
1. General Breach 2. Res Ipsa Loquitur 3. Negligence Per Se . **General Breach** Where defendant's conduct falls short of the level of care required by the applicable duty ***Custom:*** When the standard is reasonable prudence, evidence of a custom or useage of others may be used to establish how reasonable person would behave. . **Res Ipsa Loquitor** The fact finder can **infer** breach if: 1. Defendant had control of instrumentality of harm _AND_ 2. Harm would not normally have occured in absence of negligence . **Negligence Per Se** Plaintiff may establish conclusive presumption of duty _AND_ breach where 1. Defendant violated a **criminal ordinance or statute**, 2. Plaintiff is a member of the** class of persons** the statute intends to protect, and 3. Plaintiff suffered the **type of harm** the statute intends to prevent. * **Compliance Dangerous or Impossible:** violation of a statute may be excused if compliance is (1) **more dangerous** than violation _OR_ (2) **beyond defendant's control** * **Conclusive Presumption:** A finding of negligence per se results in the **conclusive presumption of duty _and_ breach** * **Compliance Does Not Establish Due Care:** Compliance itself does not necessarily establish **due care** (just establishes duty and breach) *Order of Analysis (If NPS)* 1. Ordinary Duty 2. Specialized Duties 3. Ordinary Breach 4. Breach of Specialized Duties 5. Negligence Per SE 6. Actual Cause 7. Proximate Cause 8. Harm
33
# Torts - Negligence Factual Cause
**"But-For" Test** But for defendant's breach, plaintiff would not have been injured. . **Substantial Factor Test** Where there are **several causes** of plaintiff's injury, and of which alone would have caused plaintiff's harm, plaintiff can establish factual causation by showing defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's harm. . **Unascertainable Cause Test** Where there are **two or more negligent acts**, *only one causes the injury*, _but_ it is **unknown which act caused the harm**, then the ***burden shifts*** to the defendants and each defendant must prove their negligence did not cause the harm
34
# Torts - Negligence Proximate Cause
Generally, proximate cause is established where the type of harm plaintiff suffered was a **foreseeable result** of defendant's conduct. . **Foreseeable Intervening Events** * Medical malpractice * Negligence of rescuers * Reactive forces * Disease or accident * Defendant's conduct increased risk of harm
35
# Torts - Negligence Harm
One sentence: "Plaintiff was harmed because she suffered a broken leg"
36
# Torts - Negligence Defenses to Negligence
Only discuss if there is _time_ and they are _reasonable_. . Discuss _both_ **contributory** and **comparative** if either may apply. . 1. Contributory Negligence 2. Comparative Fault 3. Assumption of Risk 4. Emergency . **Contributory Negligence** 1. Complete Bar to Recovery 2. Last Clear Chance 3. Inattentive Plaintiff (Plaintiff could have discovered, but Defendant knew, should have known, etc. but failed to fix) . **Comparative Fault** 1. Pure Comparative Fault - Reduces the recovery by the % of plaintiff's fault 2. Non-Pure Comparative - Bars recovery if plaintiff's fault exceeds 50% . **Assumption of Risk** Plaintiff is denied recovery if 1. They **know** of the risk, 2. They **voluntarily assume** the risk _OR_ **proceed in the face of** the risk, _AND_ 3. They **understood** the risk. NOTE: Certain risks are not assumed: traveling on a **common carrier**, protected by **statute**, **fraud**, **force**, or **emergency** . **Emergency** 1. Defendant did not create the emergency 2. Defendant acted as a reasonable person under the same emergency
37
# Torts - Nuisance Nuisance
**Public Nuisance** Plaintiff must show: 1. Interference with a **common public interest** (health, safety, property rights, etc), _AND_ 2. If a private party, there mst suffer a **harm different in kind** from the harm suffered by the public in general. . **Private Nuisance** 1. An **unreasonable** invasion of another's interest in the **use and enjoyment of their land** _AND_ 2. The invasion is either: * **Intentional** _OR_ * **Unitentional** and otherwise actionable as _negligence_, _recklessness_, or _abnormally dangerous_. (Court will balance harm)
38
# Torts - Trespass Trespass
Trespass to land requires: 1. **Entry onto or remaining upon** 2. Land in the **possession of another** 3. without the possessor's **consent** _or_ a **lawful privilege** . **Physical Invasion** can be by a person or their object and includes subterranean and air space . **Mistake** is _not_ a defense . **No Harm Required** for nominal damages absent threat of repeated trespass . Under the **Necessity Defense**, the defendant is liable for **actual damages**, but _not_ **punitive damages** . **Typical Remedy** = Injunction
39
# Torts - Strict Liability Strict Liability | List
1. **Animals** * Domestic * Wild 2. **Abnormally Dangerous Activities**
40
# Torts - Strict Liability Domestic Animals
1. An **owner** of a domestic animal 2. Is **liable** for the **harm done** by the animal 3. **_Only If:_** * They **know** _or_ have **reason to know** * Of the Animal's **vicious tendencies** * That are **not common** to the species **Includes:** Cats, Dogs, Pigs, Horses, Sheep, Goats, Bees, Etc. . Common tendencies for **livestock** may include kicking, charging, or trampling.
41
# Torts - Strict Liability Wild Animals
**Owners** _and_ **possessors** of wild animals are Strictly Liable for the harm caused by those animal. . Plaintiff must show: 1. Defendant **owned/possessed** 2. A **wild animal** 3. That **caused harm** to plaintiff 4. **Of a kind** related to the wildness of the animal . **Includes:** All non-domestic Animals . **Tresspassers** must prove **negligence** of owner
42
# Torts - Strict Liability Abnormally Dangerous Activities
1. Defendant carried on an **_abnormally dangerous activity_** 2. Which **actually** _AND_ **proximately** causes harm 3. The **risk of which** makes the activity abnormally dangerous . **Abnormally Dangerous Activity Factors** 1. The **high degree** of risk/harm 2. The **gravity** of the risk 3. The **inability to eliminate risk** through reasonable care, and 4. Whether the activity is **not of common use** in the community
43
# Torts - Products Liability Analytical Approach
1. Three Theories * Strict * Negligent * Breach of Warranty 2. Strict Product Liability --> Product Defects * Manufacturing Defect * Design Defect * Failure to Warn 3. Negligent Products Liability 4. Breach of Warranty * Express * Implied * Fitness for Particular Purpose
44
# Torts - Products Liability Three Theories
1. Strict 2. Negligent 3. Breach of Warranty Liability applies to everyone in the vertical chain of distribution Cover ALL THREE theories
45
# Torts - Products Liability Strict Products Liability
1. Defendant is **in the business** of selling/distributing products 2. Defendant sells/distributes the **defective product** 3. The defect exists _at time of sale/distribution_ and the product **remains unchanged**, _AND_ 4. The defect **actually** _and_ **proximately** causes harm to a **foreseeable person** . **Defendant in the Business:** Commercial suppliers -- manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, distributors. _NOT_ casual sellers. **_Product Defects_** **Manufacturing Defect** A manufacturing defect occurs where the product **departs from the design**--such as an assembly line error . **Design Defect** 1. Risk Utility Plaintiff must prove: * **Inherently unreasonable** _and_ **significant risk**, _AND_ * The product has **little to no utility** 2. Alternative Design Plaintiff must prove: * **Reasonable** _and_ **Practical** *alternative design* * That would gave been **economically feasible** and * Would have been **safer** *NOTE:* Only discuss if a low-cost alternative design is mentioned **Failure to Warn** A manufacturer is subject to liability for failure to warn if the manufacturer: 1. **knows** or **has reason to know** the product is **likely to be dangerous** for its **intended use** 2. Has **_no_ reason to believe** users of the product will realize the danger, _AND_ 3. **Fails to adequately warn** users of either: * The product's **dangerous condition**, OR * **Facts** which make the product **likely to be dangerous** * NOTE: Consider the **obviousness** of the risk
46
# Torts - Products Liability Negligent Products Liability
1. Duty The **manufacturer** owes a duty to all **foreseeable users** _and_ **bystanders**, if when **negligently made**, the product: * Is **reasonably certain (probable)** to imperil user, _AND_ * If the plaintiff is **not immediate purchaser**, but manufacturer knows product is likely to be used by persons other than the immediate purchaser 2. Breach 3. Actual Cause 4. Proximate Cause 5. Harm 6. Defenses
47
# Torts - Products Liability Breach of Warranty
**Three Types:** 1. Express Warranty 2. Implied Warranties of Merchantability 3. Fitness for Particular Purpose . **_Express Warranty_** 1. Warranty **made expressly** 2. **Relied on** by purchaser, _AND_ 3. Breach causes harm to **foreseeable persons** . **_Implied Warranty of Merchantability_** 1. **Existence** of warranty 2. **Reliance** by buyer 3. **Breach** 4. Breach is **proximate cause** of loss . ***Merchantability*** Merchantability means that goods sold by a merchant who sells goods of the kind must: 1. be of **fair average quality** 2. be fit for **ordinary purposes** for intended use 3. be **adequately packaged/labeled**, _AND_ 4. conform to any promises or affirmations **made on the container/label** . **_Fitness for Particular Purpose_** 1. **Existence of Warranty** 2. **Breach** 3. Breach is **proximate cause** of loss . ***Fitness*** 1. Seller knos of plaintiff's special need, _AND_ 2. Recommends product with that knowledge
48
# Torts - Defamation Defamation
**Strict Liability** where: 1. Defamatory statement 2. Of or concerning the plaintiff, 3. Publication, _AND_ 4. Harm . **_Defamatory Statement_** * statement that holds the plaintiff up to ridicule or harm to reputation * Opinion not defamatory _unless_ necessarily founded in asserted facts . **Slander** 1. Oral Defamation 1. **No recovery** absent proof of special damages, _UNLESS_ **slander per se:** * Accusation of a serious crime * imputes presence of contagious or loathesome disease * tends directly to injure in respect to office, profession, trade, or business * impotence or a want of chastity (and serious sexual misconduct) * statement that causes actual damage . **Libel** 1. Written/Broadcase defamation 2. Libel Per Se (on its face, damages presumed) 3. Libel Per Quod (requires proof of extrinsic facts and the defamatory meaning in light of those facts) . **_Of or Concerning Plaintiff_** The hearer or reader reasonably understands that the statement is defamatory and refers to the plaintiff . **_Publication_** Requires communication to a third person. Includes anyone who publishes or republishes. . **_Harm_** 1. Harm is to reputation. 2. Requires proof of special damages unless per se defamation
49
# Torts - Defamation Defamation Defenses
Two major defenses: **truth** and **privilege** . **_Truth_** Truth is a complete defense to defamation. . **_Consent_** Consent is a defense to defamation. * Express * Implied * Scope * Capacity to Consent . **_Privilege_** **(1) Absolute** Includes statements between 1. **spouses** and 2. Those made in: * The proper discharge of an official duty (legal duty imposed on government official) * Legislative Proceeding * Judicial Proceeding; _OR_ * In the initiation or course of any other official proceeding authorized by law. NOTE: Doesn't matter if there was malice/falsity . **_Qualified_** A qualified privilege exists if the statement is made **without malice**, to an **interested person**, by someone who: 1. Is **also interested** 2. Stands in relationship with interested person as to afford reasonable ground for supposing an **innocent motive** for communication, _OR_ 3. Is **requested** by person interested to give information . **_First Amendment Defenses_**
50
# Torts - Defamation First Amendment Defenses
**Plaintiff is Public Official/Person** Plaintiff must _also_ prove: (5) The statement was **false** (6) Defendant acted **with malice** (knowledge that it was false or reckless disregard for the truth) . **Private Plaintiff + Matter of Public Concern** Plaintiff must _also_ prove: (5) **Falsity** and (6) That the defendant make the false statement, either: * **negligently** in order to obtain **actual damages**, _OR_ * With **malice** to recover **presumed** or **punitive damages**
51
# Torts - Invasion of Privacy Invasion to Privacy
1. Intrusion into Secusion 2. Public Disclosure of Private FAct 3. False Light 4. Appropriation . **_Intrusion to Seclusion_** 1. Defendant **unreasonably** _and_ **seriously** interferes with plaintiff's interest in **not having affairs known**, _AND_ 2. Defendant should have realized their conduct would **offens person of reasonable sensibilities** . **_Public Disclosure of Private Fact_** 1. Public disclosure 2. Of a private fact 3. That would be **offensive** or **objectionable** to a reasonable person 4. That is **not of legitimate public concern** **Private Fact:** a fact is private if the plaintiff has made **reasonable attempts** to keep the matter private **Newsworthiness** 1. Social Value 2. Depth of Intrusion 3. Voluntarily acceded to public notoriety . **_False Light_** 1. Defendant **publicized private matter** concerning plaintiff 2. That places plaintiff before public in **false light** 3. That would be **highly offensive** to a reasonable person, _AND_ 4. If it is a **matter of public interest,** that defendant acted **with malice** (knowledge or reckless disregard of the falsity of the matter and the false light) . **_Appropriation_** 1. Appropriation or use 2. Of Plaintiff's identity 3. by Defendant 4. For Defendant's commercial use
52
# Torts - Misrepresentation Misrepresentation
**_Intentional Misrepresentation_** 1. Misrepresentation of **material past or present fact** 2. **Scienter** (Knew or Believed statement was false or had no bases) 3. **Intent to Induce** plaintiff to act or refrain from acting in reliance on misrepresentation 4. **Causation** (*Actual* reliance) 5. **Justifiable Reliance** 6. Damages (**Actual Pecuniary Loss**) . **Concealment** (1) Requires an **omission of material fact** that makes defendant's previous statement misleading or untrue _OR_ they had a **duty to disclose** (+ remaining IM elements.) . **Duty to Disclosue** No duty to disclose, _UNLESS_ 1. **Fiduciary** to plaintiff 2. Selling **real property** knowing plaintiff is unaware/cant reasonably discover, _OR_ 3. Defendant's words have deceived plaintiff . **_Negligent Misrepresentation_** (2) **Scienter** requires that defendant: * Made statement honestly believing them to be true * But without reasonable ground for such belief
53
# Torts - Interference with Economic Relationships Interference with Economic Relationship
**_Interference with Contract_** 1. **Interference** (Action, not Omission) 2. Which is Intentional and 3. Improper or Unlawful (and Unprivileged), 4. In Contract between Two Other PErsons, 5. Causing one of them to Not Perform on Contract . **_Interference with Economic Relationship_** 1. Economic relationship between Plaintiff and third party; 2. Defendant knows of relationship 3. Intentional wrongful acts, independent of interference itself, designed to disrupt relationship 4. Actual disruption of relationship; _AND_ 5. Damages are proximately caused by acts
54
# Torts - Damages Tort Damages
**_Purely Economic Loss_** Generally not recoverable in **negligence**, _UNLESS_ there is also injury to person or property . **_Punitive Damages_** Only recoverable if Defendant's conduct was malicious, willful, or completely reckless . **Tort Damages** 1. Causal 2. Foreseeable 3. Reasonably Certain, and 4. Unavoidable
55
# Torts - Contribution Contribution
Where there is **joing-and-several liability** _AND_ **comparative fault**, contribution allows any tortfeasor who is required to pay more than his share of the damages to have a claim against the **other joint tortfeasors** for the excess he paid. . Does not apply in non-JSL jurisdictions.
56
# Torts - Damages Indemnity
Shifts liability 100% from one defendant to another. . Available under: 1. Vicarious Liability (when only one party liable) 2. Strict Products Liability 3. Considerable Difference In FAult