Civil Procedure Flashcards
Civil Procedure - Personal Jurisdiction
Personal Jurisdiction
List
- Traditional Bases
- Long Arm Statute
- Minimum Contacts
Civil Procedure - Personal Jurisdiction
Traditional Bases
- Domicile
- Consent
- Presence in State
- In Rem Jurisdiction
Domicile
Individuals: Place where they permanently intend to reside
Corporations: (1) State of Incorporation OR (2) Principal Place of Business
.
Consent
A party may consent to jurisdiction by responding to the complain without challenging jurisdiction.
Consent is not established by a special appearance to challenge jurisdiction
.
Presence in State When Served
.
In Rem Jurisdiction
Dispute involves title to property located in the forum state.
Civil Procedure - Personal Jurisdiction
Long Arm Statute
A Long Arm Statute is always needed to exercise jurisdiction over non-resident defenants in absence of traditional basis.
.
ASSUME THERE IS A LONG ARM STATUTE
Civil Procedure - Personal Jurisdiction
Minimum Contacts
- Due Process
- General and/or Specific Jurisdiction
- Fairness
.
.
Due Process
Exercise of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant must comport with due process. Due Process requires the defendant to have such minimum contacts with the forum state so that the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
.
.
General Jurisdiction
General jurisdiction is established where Defendant’s contacts with forum state is so systematic and continuous or constant and pervasive as to render defendant “at home” in forum state.
.
For Individuals general jurisdiction is limited to domicle or service in state
.
For Corporations general jurisdiction is limited to state of incorporation or PPoB
.
.
Specific Jurisdiction
1. Purposeful availment of the privileges and benefits of forum state
2. Forseeable to defendant that defedant would be haled to forum court, AND
3. Relatedness, which requires claim or cause of action arose out of or related to contacts with forum state.
.
.
Fairness
Consider several factors, including:
1. Trial forum not gravely difficult and inconvenient that Defendant at severe disadvantage
2. Forum state’s legitimate interest in providing redress for its resident
3. Plaintiff’s interest in convenient relief
4. Interstate judicial system interest in efficient resolution
5. Share Interest of state furthering fundamental substantive social policies
Civil Procedure - Service of Process
Service of Process
ONLY DISCUSS when there is a motion to quash/dismiss for insufficient service
.
Federal Rules
(1) Any person may serve a summons and complaint if they are:
* Above the Age of 18
* Not a party
(2) Adequate Service is effected by:
- Personal Service
- Service left at Defendant’s usual abode with person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
- Service on an Officer, Managing Agent, or Authorized Agent of a corporation, partnership, or similar entity, OR
- According to state rules for service in forum state
.
.
California Rules
(1) Any person may serve a summons and complaint if they are:
- Above the Age of 18
- Not a party
(2) Adequate Service is effected by:
- Personal Service
- Substituted service
- Service by mail
- Service by publication
Civil Procedure - Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Two types of Subject Matter Jurisdiction:
1. Federal Question
2. Diversity
& Supplemental Jurisdiction
.
.
Federal Question
A claim or cause of action (but not anticipated defense) “arises under the US Constitution, Federal Law, or a Treaty.
.
.
Diversity
1. Complete Diversity between all plaintiffs and defendants
2. Amount in Controversy exceeds $75,000 as alleged by a complain in good faith
.
Corporations: Citizenship is established in state of incorporation and principal place of business
.
Alienage: Applies were one party is citzen of foreign nation and another party is citzen of US State. (Does not apply if foreign citizen is resident of US State)
.
.
Supplemental Jurisdiction
Federal court can entertain claims otherwise lacking subject matter jurisdiction if it shares a common nucleus of operative facts with the claim that does not otherwise invoke the court’s jurisdiction.
Civil Procedure - Venue
Federal Rules
Venue Proper
Venue for civil actions in federal court is proper in the judicial district:
(1) Where any Defendant resides (only if all Defenants reside in same state)
(2) Where substantial part of
(a) events or omissions giving rise to claim occurred, OR
(b) property involved is situated.
.
OTHERWISE –>
.
Actions based solely on diversity:
1. Any district where any defendant
2. Is subject to personal jurisdiction
3. At the time the action commenced
.
Action not based on diversity:
Any district where any defendant can be found
.
Residence
Corporate Residence is any district where the corporation is subject to personal jurisdiction
Natural Persons: Residence based on domicile
.
.
Transfer of Venue
If Original Venue Improper, court must dismiss, or in “interest of justice,” transfer case to proper venue.
.
If Original Venue Proper,venue may be transferred to
- Another District where action may have been brought if appropriate when balancing the relative conveniences of parties, witnesses, and evidence, OR
- Another district with all parties’ consent
Civil Procedure - Venue
California Rules
Venue Proper
Refers to the proper county
.
Local Action
- Invovles title to property.
- Venue appropriate in county where property located.
.
Transitory Actions
- All non-local-actions are transitory
- Venue proper in any county where Defendant resides at commencement of action
.
.
Transfer of Venue
Even when original venue is proper, court may transfer venue when:
- Reason to believe that impartial trial cannot be held in original county,
- No judge qualified in county to hear case, OR
- Convenience of witnesses and ends of justice are promoted
Civil Procedure - Venue
Forum Non Conveniens
In deciding whether to tranfer, courts consider:
.
(1) Public Factors
(a) Availability of the forum
(b) Plaintiff’s choice
(c) Forum’s interest
.
(2) Private Factors
(a) Convenience
(b) Location of Evidence
Civil Procedure - Eerie Doctrine
Eerie Doctrine
Only applies in diversity cases
.
Eerie Doctrine requires federal courts in diversity cases apply state substantive law and federal procedural law.
.
Where state and federal law conflict/overlap, federal laws prevail.
.
.
Conflict with Non-Procedural Federal Rule
If a federal rule is not procedural and conflicts with state law, consider:
1. Outcome Determinative
2. Balance of Interest
3. Forum Shopping
Civil Procedure - Removal & Remand
Removal & Remand
Removal
1. Requires Subject Matter Jurisdiction to remove from state to federal court
2. Removal Venue is federal court where state action filed
3. All Defendants Must Join in order to remove
4. Timeliness Requirement (within 30 days)
5. Defendant sued in state court in state of residence cannot remove to federal court for diversity
.
.
Remand
Takes a case from federal court to state court.
Only granted if moveant shows the federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
Civil Procedure - Abstention
Abstention
Doctrine by which federal court will retain jurisdiction over constitutional challenge to state law, but will refrain from deciding the question until state courts have interpreted the state law.
.
Exceptions
Federal court will intervene when:
1. Potential for great and immediate irreparable injury
2. bad faith in prosecution of state action, OR
3. harassment
Civil Procedure - Pleading
Federal - Notice Pleading
Pleading that sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim, must contain:
1. Short and plain statement on which the court’s jurisdiction depends,
2. Short and plain statement showing pleader entitled to relief
3. demand for judgment for relief pleader seeks
- Complaint must contain factual allegations that taken as a whole render P’s claim “plausible”
- Court disregards any conclusory statements
Civil Procedure - Pleading
California - Fact (Code) Pleading
Complaint or cross-complaint must contain a statement of facts constituting the cause of action in ordinary and concise language.
.
Complaints and affirmative defenses must contain ultimate facts, not evidentiary facts or legal conclusions.
.
Legal conclusions and evidentiary facts may be stricken
Civil Procedure - Pleading
California - Doe Amendments
California allows plaintiffs to name Doe defendants and later add defendants by amendment (allows relationback) if:
1. Original complaint timely filed and contains charging allegations against all defendants, including Doe defendants
2. Plaintiff is genuinely ignorant of:
* Identity of fictitious defendant * Facts giving rise to cause of action, _OR_ * Fact for which law provides cause of action
- Plaintiff’s ignorance pleaded in complaint.