Torts Flashcards
Transferred Intent
Applies where D intends to commit a tort against one person but instead:
- Commits a different T against that person
- Commits same tort as intended but against a diff person; or
- Commits a different tort against a DIFFERENT person.
It transfers to the tort actually committed. If you intend an assault but commit a battery against person 2 then you are liable for the battery. Only applicable where the resulting tort is:
- Assault;
- Battery;
- False Imprisonment
- Trespass to land; or
- Trespass to chattels
Battery
- Harmful or offensive contact;
- To P’s person
- Intent; and
- Causation.
Damages not required.
Assault
- An act by D creating reasonable apprehension in P;
- Of immediate harmful or offensive contact to P’s person;
- Intent; and
- Causation.
Apprehension must be reasonable. Fear without apprehension of attack is not enough. Apparent ability suffices.
Words alone without context is insufficient.
The battery must be imminent, not a future threat.
Damages not required.
False Imprisonment
- An act or omission on the part of D that confines or restrains P to a BOUNDED AREA;
- Intent; and
- Causation.
Moral pressure and/or future threats insufficient to be restraint or confinement.
P must know of the confinement OR be harmed by it.
There must be no REASONABLE means of escape KNOWN to P.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Act by D amounting to Extreme and Outrageous conduct
- Intent or recklessness;
- Causation; and
- Damages—severe emotional distress.
Requires ACTUAL DAMAGES
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Special Circumstances/Bystander
Special Circumstances: Conduct that is not normally outrageous may become so if: (i) It is continuous in nature; (ii) Directed toward a certain type of P (children, elderly, sensitive P’s); or (iii) it is committed by a certain type of D (common carriers).
Bystander Cases: (i) where D intentionally causes physical harm to a third person and the P suffers emotional distress the P may recover by either showing the normal IIED elements; OR:
- Present when injury occurred;
- Close relative of injured/dead third person; and
- D knew facts 1 and 2.
Trespass to Land
- Physical invasion of P’s real property;
- Intent (only intent to enter land) and
- Causation.
May be by an object, like tossing something onto property. Intangible is probably a nuisance claim.
Real Property includes air and subterranean space.
Trespass to Chattels
- D’s act interferes with P’s right of possession in chattel (damages or dispossession);
- Intent;
- Causation; and
- Damages.
Usually short term, as opposed to permanent deprivation.
Conversion
Same elements as trespass to chattels, but the damage is such that P is entitled to full value of chattel as damage. Examples: destruction of the property, long term wrongful detention, theft, severe damage to property, etc.
Remedy may be FMV of the chattel or possession.
Defenses to Intentional Torts
- Consent;
- Defense of self, others, or property;
- Necessity; and
- Recapture.
Consent
Express Consent (undone if D knew of mistake as to consent and took advantage, if induced by fraud or misrepresentation; obtained by duress (except for only future threats)).
Implied Consent, inferred from reasonable circumstances.
Exception is exceeding consent.
Self Defense
- Available where a person reasonably believes they are about to be attacked.
- No duty to retreat.
- Not available to initial aggressor unless non-deadly force is responded to with deadly force.
- Reasonable mistake is permitted.
- More force than necessary vitiates the defense.
Self Defense: Property
- May be used, but does not apply after loss of the property. Recapture only available in hot pursuit and the force must be reasonable.
- Does not apply to one with a privilege, that will supersede right of self defense. Mistake is NOT allowed as to one who has privilege.
- May not use force causing death or seriously bodily harm, even to defend one’s home.
Defense: Recapture of Chattels
- Timely demand required;
- May only be from the tortfeasor who took the chattels;
- Privileged to enter onto land of wrongdoer to take the chattels in a reasonable time and reasonable manner AFTER making the demand. Can do so for innocent party as well, but liable for any damage caused by entry,.
Mistake not permitted.
Arrest Without a Warrant
Officer:
(i) Privileged when Cop believes felony committed and that the person arrested has committed it; (ii) Force allowed as reasonably necessary to make arrest, Deadly Force only allowed when suspect poses a threat of serious harm.
Citizen:
(i) Privileged for Citizen when a felony has in fact been committed and Citizen must reasonably believe that the person arrested has committed it; (ii) Force allowed as reasonably necessary to make arrest, Deadly Force only allowed when suspect poses a threat of serious harm.
Misdemeanor:
Only Cops can arrest, except for breach of peace and citizen sees it. Deadly force never permitted.
Shopkeeper Privilege
- Reasonable belief as to theft;
- Detention is reasonable manner and reasonable force; and
- Only for a reasonable period of time.
Defense: Necessity
When necessary to enter onto property of another to protect yourself or others from imminent harm.
If a public necessity, to protect public, then no liability to owner of land. If private necessity then liable only for resulting damage of the entry.
Negligence
- Duty on the part of a D to conform to a specific standard of conduct;
- Breach of that duty by D;
- Breach is the actual and proximate cause of P’s injury; and
- Damage.
Negligence: Duty of Care
- Was P foreseeable?
- If so, what is applicable standard of care?
Rescuer is a foreseeable P, but firefighter/cops may be barred from suing.
Wrongful life not allowed.
Negligence: Standard of Care
Basic Standard - Reasonably Prudent Person: Objective standard, measured against what an average person would do. This average person is a hypothetical a reasonable person of average intelligence and physical characteristics (however considered to have same physical characteristics as the D).
If you have better than the average person, then you must use those experience/capabilities as a reasonable person would.
Negligence: Particular Standards of Care
- Professionals: The standards of their profession. Doctor breaches this by not disclosing risks.
- Children: Of like age, education, intelligence, and experience. Under 5 there is a presumption they cannot be negligent. If engaged in adult activities may be presume an adult standard of care.
- Common carrier: Very high, even slight negligence, but P must be a guest.
- Guest in car owed ordinary care. L
Negligence: Bailment Duties
Bailee standard of care depends on who benefits from the bailment:
- If for the sole benefit of the bailor, there is low standard of care
- If for sole benefit of the bailee, there is a high standard of care;
- If for mutual benefit, then a ordinary standard of care.
Duties of Bailor, where for benefit of bailee, inform of known dangerous defects in the chattel.
Owners and/or Occupiers of Land: Duty Owed to Undiscovered Trespasser, Discovered or Anticipated Trespasser, Child, Licensee, and Invitee.
Types of conditions
Undiscovered Trespasser: No duty.
Discovered or Undiscovered Trespasser: (i) Duty to warn of or make safe of artificial conditions if non-obvious and highly dangerous; and (ii) Duty of reasonable care for active operations.
Child: (i) Duty to warn of or make safe artificial conditions if foreseeable risk to child outweighs expense of eliminating danger; (ii) re: natural conditions, same as (i) but balancing test less likely to be met; and (iii) Duty of reasonable care for active operations.
Licensee: (i) Duty to warn of or make safe artificial conditions if non-obvious and dangerous; (ii) Duty to warn of or make safe natural conditions if non-obvious and dangerous; and (iii) Duty of reasonable care for active operations.
Invitee: (i) Duty to make reasonable inspections and discover non-obvious dangerous artificial conditions and warn of or make them safe; (ii) Duty to make reasonable inspections and discover non-obvious dangerous natural conditions and warn of or make them safe; and (iii) Duty of reasonable care for active operations.
Attractive Nuisance Doctine
Applicable where:
- A dangerous condition on the land that owner is or should be aware of;
- The owner knows or should know children frequent the vicinity of the condition;
- the condition is likely to cause injury; and
- The expense of remedying the situation is slight compared with the magnitude of the risk.
Liability can only attach if ALL four are met.
Remember the child DOES NOT have to be initially attracted onto the land by the dangerous condition.
Licensee
One who enters onto the land with the possessors permission for her OWN BUSINESS OR PURPOSE.
Social guests, fire fighters, police.
Invitee
Invited by landowner in connection with landowner’s business, or on land held open to the public.
Members of the public, business visitor.
Duty Owed to Users of Recreational Land
A landowner who permits public to use land for fun without charging a fee is not liable for injuries suffered by user unless the landowner willfully and maliciously failed to guard against or warn of a dangerous condition.
Duties of Lessor and Lessee
LL may be liable to TT of defects which is aware of or has reason to know, and which lessee not likely to discover. But TT can still be liable to the guests of TT.
Statutory Standards of Care
Replaces more general common law duty of care where:
- P is within protected class; and
- Statute was designed to prevent the harm suffered by P.
Creates conclusive presumption of duty and breach of duty. Negligence per se.
Duty Re: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
- P must be within zone of danger; and
- P must suffer physical symptoms from the distress.
severe shock to the nervous system is enough.
Exception:
- P and person injured are closely related
- P was present at the scene of injury; and
- P personally observed or perceived the event.