Torts Flashcards
Transferred intent
- Intends to commit a tort against one person but instead
A. Commits a different tort against that person
B. Commits that tort to a different person
C. Commits a different tort against a different person
False imprisonment
- Intent
- Confine or restrain to bounded area
- Causation
- Awareness of confinement
IIED
- Intent or recklessness
- Extreme or outrageous conduct
- Causation
- Damages- severe emotional distress
Extreme and outrageous conduct
- Continuous
- Sensitive plaintiff( child/ elderly: infirm)
- Special defendant/ duty
Trespass to chattels
- Intent
- Act that interfered with plaintiffs right of possession
- Causation
- Damages
Conversion
- Intent
- Act that seriously interfered with plaintiffs right of possession
- Causation
- Damages
Remedy- replevin or fair market damages at time of conversion
Intentional tort defensed
- Consent (express or implied)
- Self defense/ defense of others/ defense of property
- Privilege of arrest
- Necessity
- Discipline
Standards of care
- Default- reasonably prudent person
- Professional- knowledge and skill of member of profession in good standing
- Children- child of similar age, education, experience - subjective test
Landowner duties
- To off premises- duty to protect from his caused artificial conditions
- On premises
A. Trespasser- no duty to undiscovered T
To known T- duty to warn of known artificial dangerous conditions
B. Licensee- duty to warn of or make safe dangerous conditions likely to not be discovered by licensee. Exercise reasonable care in active operations- no duty to inspect or repair
C. Invitees- licensee duties + duty to inspect and repair
Attractive nuisance
- Dangerous condition on land owner should be aware of
- Owner knows or should have known children often visit
- Condition likely to cause injury
- Cost of remedy is slight compared to magnitude of risk
Statutory standard of care
- Plaintiff is within protected class
2. Injury is of type statute was meant to protect against
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
- Plaintiff in zone of danger
- Physical symptoms
Except
3. Family member bystander and present, and personally perceived event
- Special relationship with tortfeasor/ plaintiff ( doctor/ patient etc)
Res ipsa loquitur
- Accident doesnt normally occur without negligence
- Negligence attributable to defendant (exclusive control)
No directed verdict allowed
Causation
- But for test
- Substantial factor test
- Unascertainable causes approach- burden of proof shifts to defendants
Contributory negligence
Plaintiffs claim barred if contributed to own injury