Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Market share liability doctrine

A

if the plaintiff’s injuries are caused by a fungible (identical) product and it is impossible to identify which defendant placed the harmful product into the market, the jury can apportion liability based on each defendant’s share of the market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Three elements to prove an intentional tort

A
  • Act
  • Intent AND
  • Causation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intent requirements for an intentional tort

A

Acting with the purpose of causing the occurence

OR

They know consequence is substantially certain to follow

Intent can be transferred, whether it is a different tort, diferrent person, or both

Note: Children and mentally incapacitated people can have intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Battery

  • What is it
  • Causation
  • Intent
  • Damages
A
  • Two requirements
    • D causes a harmful or offensive contact with the person of another AND
    • Acted with intent to cause the contact or apprehension of the contact
  • Transferred intent applies
  • Damages
    • Nominal allowed
    • Eggshell plaintif rule applies
    • Punitive damages if D acted:
      • Outrageously OR
      • With Malice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Harmful or Offensive Contact for Battery Qualifications AND what does person of another include?

A
  • Harmful = causes an injury, pain, or illness
  • Offensive = a person of ordinary sensibilities would find the contact offensive (eg groping)
    • BUT if D knows victim is hypersensitive, D may be liable
  • Person of another includes anything connected to P
    • Eg Chair or hat on head
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eggshell Plaintiff Rule

A

A defendant is liable for all harm tha flows from a battery, even if it is much worse than they expected it to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the defense to battery?

A

Consent (express of implied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assault Requirements

A
  • Act that causes a reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful OR offensive bodily contact AND
  • D intends to cause apprehension of such contact or such contact itself

Notes

  • No contact required
  • Plaintiff’s apprehension must be reasonable
  • P must be aware of D’s action
  • Imminent = must be without significant delay (threat of future harm is not enough)
  • Mere words generally is not assult, but can be enough
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assault Damages

A

Similar to battery

Nominal damages ok

Can get damages for physical harm flowing from the assault

Punitive damages may be available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

A

Defendant intentionally or recklessly engages in extreme AND outrageous conduct that causes P severe emotional distress

EXCEPTION (constitutional): Public figures (or matters of public concern) cannot recover unless they can show a false statement of fact made with actual malice

Malice = knowledge that the statement was false or with reckless disregard of falsity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is extreme and outrageous conduct?

A

Conduct that exceeds the possible limits of human decency as to be entirely intolerable in a civilized society

Need more than threats

When it is likely:

  • D is in a position of authority or influence over P
  • P is a member of a group that has heightened sensitivities (think children or elderly)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When can a third party recover for IIED?

A
  • Immediate Family Member - Intent transfers if:
    • Present at time of conduct
    • Perceives the conduct
    • Do not need to suffer a bodily injury
  • Bystander - Higher bar for intent to transfer:
    • Present at time of conduct
    • Perceives the conduct AND
    • suffers a bodily injury (physical manifestation of distress)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Damages for IIED

A
  • Don’t need to have a physical injury
  • If hypersensitive, can only recover for that level if D was aware
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

False Imprisonment

A

Three Requirements:

  • Defendant intends to confine or restrain another within fixed boundaries
    • Area of confinement can be large or moving
  • The actions directly or indirectly result in confinement
  • P is concious of the confinement or harmed by it

EXCEPTION: Shopkeeper’s privilege - they can detain a suspected shoplifter for a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intent needed for false imprisonment

A

Must act either:

  1. purpose of confining P OR
  2. knowing confinement is subtantially certain to result
    * Negligence is not enough*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What kind of damages can you get for false imprisonment?

A

Nominal and actual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Six Defenses to Intentional Torts Involving Personal Injury

A
  1. Consent
  2. Self-Defense
  3. Defense of Others (can use if other could use self-defense)
  4. Defense of Property
  5. Parental Discipline (reasonable force allowed)
  6. Privilege of Arrest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Express Consent to Intentional Physical Injury Torts

A

The P, by words or actions, manifests the willingness to to submit to the defendant’s conduct (limited by scope)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cosent by mistake

A

Valid defense unless D cause mistake or took advantage of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Consent by fraud

A

Invalid if it goes to an essential matter (otherwise still valid defense)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Implied Consent for Intentional Torts

A

P is silent where their silence and continued participation can reasonably construed as consent

Situations where is arises

  • Emergency
  • Injuries arising from athletic contests
    • EXCEPTION: Conduct is reckless
  • Mutual consent to combat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Exception to consent defense

A

Capacity may undermine validity of consent (ex: Youth, intoxication, and incompetency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When is self-defense allowed?

A

You are allowed to use a proportionate force to defend against an offensive contact or bodily harm

Most jurisdictions do not require duty to retreat before using deadly force

EXCEPTION: If you are initial agressor can only claim if other party responsed to nondeadly force with deadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What happens if a bystander is injured while you use self-defense?

A

Not liable as long as the injury was accidental and you were not negligent toward the bystander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

When is defense of property allowed?

A

You can use reasonable force to prevent tortious harm to the property

AND you can use it to reclaim personal property that was wrongfully taken, IF you request it to be returned first UNLESS the request would be futile –> BUT if original taking was lawful, you can only use peaceful means

NO deadly force allowed, including mechanical devices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

When is force to regain property allowed?

A

split

common law: reasonable force permitted

modern: must use legal process

27
Q

When may a private citizen use privilege of arrest defense?

A

May use reasonable force to make a felony arrest if:

  • The felony has actually been committed AND
  • Arresting party has reasonable ground to suspect that the person being arrested has committed the felony

Mistake as to identity is OK

Mistake as to whether there was a valid felony IS NOT ok

For misdemeanor, can only make arrest if there is a breach of the peace

28
Q

When may a police officer use privilege of arrest defense?

A

They must just reasonable believe that a felony has been committed and the person arrested comitted it

Mistake of felony or identity is ok

Arrest for misdemeanor is only allowed if it was committed in officer’s prescence

29
Q

Trespass to Chattels

A

An intentional interference with P’s right to possess personal property either by:

  • Dispossessing P of chattel
  • Using or intermeddling with Ps chattel OR
  • Damaging the chattel

need only intend to do interfering act and not an intent to interfere

Mistake about legality is not a defense

30
Q

Damages for Trespass to Chattel

A

Can get actual damages, damges resulting from the loss of use, OR cost of repair

EXCEPTION: If intermeddling, P only gets actual damages

31
Q

Conversion

A

Intentionally committing an act that deprives P of possession of chattel or interfering with chattel so much, it deprieves P use of the chattel

Just need to intend to commit the act

Mistake of law or fact is not a defense

32
Q

Damages for conversion

A

Chattel’s full value at the time of conversion

33
Q

Factors to decide between tresspass to chattels vs. conversion

A

General Rule: The more extreeme the interference the more likely the court will find conversion

  • Duration and extent of interference
  • D’s intent to assert a right inconsistent with rightful possessor
  • D’s good fatih
  • Expense and inconvenience to P
  • Extent of the harm
34
Q

Trespass to Land

A

D intentionally causes a physical invasion (themself or objects) of someone’s land

Need to only intend to enter the land

Mistake of fact is not a defense

35
Q

Who can bring an action of trespass to land

A

Anyone on posession, not just the owner

36
Q

Damages for trespass

A

Don’t need actual damages

37
Q

Necessity as a defense to trespass

A

When someone enters land of another or interferes with their personal property to prevent an injury or other severe harm

38
Q

Private vs. Public Necessity

A
  • Private = protecting self
    • Must pay for any actual (not nominal) damages caused
    • Landowner cannot use force to exclude the person
  • Public = private property can be intruded upon or destroyed when necessary to protect a large number of people from public calamities
    • NOT liable for danges
39
Q

What does it mean if a driver guest statute has been passed

A

Then a driver in that state is only liable to injuries that arise from gross or wanton conduct, and aren’t liable for negligence

40
Q

For strict products liability, when is a supplier of the materials used to make the final product liable?

A

They are not liable unless the component itself is defective or the supplier substantially participates in the integration process and the integration of the component causes the product to be defective

41
Q

What is private nuisance?

A

An activity that substantially and unreasonable interferes with anothers use and enjoyment of land

unreasonable interference = objective reasonable person test

Balance of the interference with the utility of the nuisance

42
Q

Is the blocking of natural light or a view a nuisance?

A

No to both

EXCEPTION: Fence or wall put up with no purpose except to block neighbor’s view or sunlight

43
Q

Are there defenses to a private nuisance?

A

There are two partial defenses:

  1. Compliance with regulations (evidence that activity is reasonable)
  2. Coming to the nuisance
44
Q

What is a public nuisance and who can bring a case about it?

A

An unreasonable interference with a right common to the public as a whole

Case can be brought by:

  • ​Public officials on behalf of the public to abate the nuisance
  • Private individual if they have been harmed in a specific or unique way
45
Q

What is the general duty owed by all people?

A

A duty of reasonable care is owed to all persons who may foreseeably be injured by the defendant’s conduct

There is no duty to act affirmatively

It is an objective standard that asks what a reasonably pruden person under the circumstances would do

46
Q

Split view on scope of a foreseeable plaintiff

A

Majority/Cardozo: A duty is owed if the P is a member of the class of persons who might be foreseeably harmed by the conduct

Minority/Andrews: Anytime conduct can harm someone there is a duty to everyone, and whether this particular plaintiff was foreseeable is a proximate cause issue

47
Q

Exceptions to no affirmative duty to act (4)

A
  1. Assumption of duty: if you voluntarily rescure/aid another, you have a duty of reasonable care in the performance of that aid or rescue
  2. Placing another in danger
  3. By authority: a person with the ability and authority to conrol another must exercise reasonable control (ex: parent and child or prisoner and warden)
  4. By relationship: A defendant has a special relationship with the plaintiff (Ex: common-carrier & passenger or innkeeper & guest)
48
Q

Which of the following are taken into account when determining the standard of care owed:

  • Mental and emotional characteristics
  • Physical Characteristics
  • Intoxication
  • Minor status
A
  • Mental and emotional characteristics - NO
    • We presume average mental abilities and knowledge
  • Physical Characteristics - YES
    • D is compared to reasonably prudent person with like characteristics (ex: blind)
  • Intoxication - NO
    • Exception: intoxication was involuntary
  • Minor status - YES
    • D is compated to reasonable child of similar age, intelligence, and experience
      • Exception: Children engaged in high-risk adult acitivities do not get modified standard (ex: driving)
49
Q

Standard of care for common carriers and inkeepers

A

split

Traditional: Utmost care - highest duty of care consistent with the practical operations of business

Modern: Liable only for ordinary negligence (normal standard)

50
Q

Standard of care for automobile drivers

A

Traditional: Drivers only liable for grossly negligent, wanton, or willful misconduct (called guest statutes)

Modern: Ordinary standard of care is applied to drivers

51
Q

Standard of care for bailees

A

Bailee = someone who takes temporary possession of another’s property (ex. = valet)

Complicated common law rules:

  • Must worn a gratuitious bailee of known dangerous conditions
  • If bailor receives sole benefit, bailee has lesser duty
  • If the bailee receives a benefit, higher duty, and even slight negligence can result in liability
52
Q

Standard of care for emegency situations

A

Standard is that of a reasonable person under the same circumstances

53
Q

Majority approach to duties owed to people on land

A

tripartate strcuture with different duty owed to each group

  • Trespassers duty: refrain from willful, wanton, intentional, or reckless misconduct (ex: spring gun)
    • Must warn or protect discovered trespassers of hidden dangers
    • No duty owed to undiscovered trespassers
  • Licensee duty: either make the property reasonable safe or warn of concealed dangers
    • Don’t need to inspect
  • Invitee Duty: Must use reasonable care to inspect the property, discover unreasonably dangerous conditions, and take reasonable steps to protect the invitee from them
    • Can be public (when land is held open to public) or a business visitor
    • NON-DELEGABLE - cannot avoid duty by assigning to someone else
54
Q

Attractive Nusiance Doctrine Requirements

A

Liable for injuries to children trespassing on land if:

  1. An artificial condition exists in a place where the owner knows or has a reason to know children are likely to trespass
  2. The land possessor knows or has reason to know that the artificial condition poses an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm
  3. The children, because of their age, do not discover or cannot appreciate the danger
  4. The utility of maintaining the condition is slight compared to the risk of injury AND
  5. The land possessor fails to exercise reasonable care
55
Q

The California/Modern approach to duty owed to persons on land

A

Split

Some say reasonable care is just owed to all entrants (and trespasser status is considered a factor in determining reasonable care)

Third restatement says reasonable care under the circumstances is owed to all except flagrant trespassers (who you just must refrain from intentional, willful, or wanton actions that cause harm)

56
Q

Duties of landlord vs. tenant

A

Landlord

  • Maintain safe common areas
  • Warn of hidden dangers AND
  • Repair hazardous conditions

Tenant = liable for injuries arising from conditions within their control

57
Q

Duty owed to off-premises victim

A

General rule is not liable for injuries resulting from natural conditions (ex: tree falling on neighbor property)

EXCEPTION: trees in urban areas

For artificial conditions, must prevent unreasonabel risk of harm to persons not on the premises

58
Q

Two approaches to breach

A

Traditional: What would a reasonably prudent person have done

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Hand Formula - Burden v. Probability of harm x severity of loss

59
Q

The rules for custom when it comes to breach

A
  • General rule = Custom is admissible evidence but not dispositive
  • For professionals (lawyers, accountants, electricians, etc.) custom is admissible and dispositive
    • It can be a shield or a sword
  • Custom for physicians is the national standard (used to be same or similar locality)
60
Q

Informed consent rule for doctors

A
  • Patients must give informed consent to procedures
    • Informed = doctors must explain risks of medical procedure
  • Doctor does not need to inform patient if:
    • The risks are commonly known
    • Patient is unconcious
    • Patient waives or refuses info
    • Patient is incompetent OR
    • Patient would be harmed by disclosure
61
Q

Negligence per se elements (5)

A

Negligence per se = when a law establishes a particular standard of care, violation of the law is a breach

  1. A criminal law or regulatory statute imposes a particular duty for the protection of others
  2. D violated the statue
  3. P is in the class of people intended to be protected by the statute
  4. The accident is the type of harm that the statute was intended to protect against AND
  5. The harm was caused by a violation of the statue

Note: compliance with statute does not = reasonable care

62
Q

Defense to negligence per se

A

Excuse for non-compliance

examples:

  • Compliance with statute would have been more dangerous
  • Compliance was impossible
  • Emergency justified violation
  • Incapacity
  • Exercised reasonable care in trying to comply
  • Vagueness
63
Q

Res ipsa loquitur Elements (3) & application to medical malpractice and products liability

A
  1. The accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence
  2. It was caused by an agent or instrumentality within the exclusive control of D
  3. It was not due to any action on the part of the Plaintiff

Medical malpractice = Some jurisdictions shift burden to ALL defendants if res ipsa loquitor is proven

Products liability = most courts ignore exclusive control requirement if it is clear defect happened before packaging

64
Q
A