Tortious Damages Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are nominal damages

A

Where in law the claimant has successfully made out a tort, but no real damage or loss was suffered (eg where the tort was actionable per se, like tresspass). The damages awarded will be a token/symbolic. The defendant will normally also have to pay the court costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The test of remoteness in Wagon Mound

A

Reasonably forseeable consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case says that insurance payments are NOT deductible from damages

A

Bradburn v GWR (the tortfeasor should not benefit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What two categories are awardable damages split into

A

SPECIAL (quantifiable - eg medical expenses prior to trial, property damage, lost wages) and GENERAL (unquantifiable - pecuniary: loss of future earnings etc and non-pecuniary: loss of amenity, pain and suffering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case says that the equivalent cost of gratuitous care by family is recoverable, so long as the carer is not also the tortfeasor?

A

Hunt v Severs (the plaintiff holds the money on trust for the carer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the categories of tortious damages

A

Contemptuous; Nominal; Aggravated; Exemplary/punitive; Restitutionary (which doesn’t exist in Britain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are aggravated damages

A

Additional damages imposed on the defendant where their behaviour caused distress etc to the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case that says that wages paid during sick leave are deductible from damages

A

Hussein v New Taplow paper Mills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case says that pension payments are NOT deductible from damages

A

Parry v Cleaver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case says that the assumed rate of interest when calculating damages for future loss is that of an idex-linked government saving scheme

A

Wells v Wells

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which case tells us tells us which elements of non-pecuniary general damages are objective / subjective

A

West v Shepherd: Loss of amenity is OBJECTIVE and pain and suffering is SUBJECTIVE (Coma patient got highest range of damages for loss of amenity, but nothing for pain and suffering)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A negligent misstatement case where damages were paid for loss of CAPITAL (the money the plaintiff lost due to the misstatement), not PROFIT (the money the plaintiff would have made had the statement been true - a contractual measure of damages)

A

Esso v Marden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Remoteness test for loss of chance is the balance of probabilities (over 50% chance)

A

Allied Maples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the aim of tortious damages

A

To give full and fair compensation for all loss suffered as a result of the tort. To restore the claimant to the position they were in before the tort. Tortious damages look back (contractual damages look forward)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are social security benefits deductible from damages

A

yes!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A fraudulent statement case where loss of profit was awarded BUT measure was loss of profit for a generic business of that type, not loss of predicted profit for that specific business

A

East v Maurer. Had the contract been breached, the measure would have been loss of profit for the business in question. Because the tort was fraudulent, the re Polemis measure (all natural direct consequences of the fraud) was applied, rather than the usual Wagon Mound measure.

17
Q

In the multiplier method of damages calculations what is the multiplicand and what is the multiplier

A

Multiplicand: The annual loss (after tax). Multiplier: the number of years left before retirement, adjusted down to reflect the vicissitudes of life and the fact that the lump sum will allow for investment opportunities

18
Q

Forseeability of the risk of physical injury is sufficient to make out forseeability of nervous shock

A

Corr v IBC

19
Q

Authority that the D need only forsee the KIND of damage, not the EXTENT

A

Hughes v Lord Advocate

20
Q

What are exemplary damages and when are they awarded

A

Damages to punish the tortfeasors bad behaviour. Rookes v Barnard: punitive damages available for 1. Arbitrary/oppressive action by agents of the state (eg Entick v Carrington); 2. Defendants conduct was calculated to make a profit; 3. where provided for in statute

21
Q

What are contemptuous damages

A

Where the plaintiff has successfully made out a case, but despite being legally in the right, their behaviour was so bad that it is felt they don’t deserve extensive damages. A way of showing the courts disapproval. Eg see Grobelaar v Sun, damages for libel reduced to £1 because Grobelaar had taken money to fix matches

22
Q

Which case says that the plaintiff’s wages in heaven are payable

A

Pickett v British Rail Engineering

23
Q

Which case says that charitable payments are NOT deductible from damages

A

McCamley v Cammel Laird (sp?)

24
Q

When might the multiplier method not be used to calculate future loss of earnings

A

When the plaintiff is a child and their possible future earnings are too uncertain: Clarke v Devon CC

25
Q

Case that stated that the aim of tortious damages is to give full and fair compensation for all loss

A

Livingstone v Raywards Coal

26
Q

What are restitutionary damages and which case says they are unavailable in English law

A

Where the defendant made a profit, but there was no loss to the plaintiff. Restitutionary damages would take the profit from the tortfeasor and award it to the plaintiff. Devenish Nutrition ruled that this measure was not available.

27
Q

Smith v Manchester award

A

Where the P is still earning at time of trial, but likely at some point to suffer lack of earnings as a result of handicap - lump sum award OR multiplier

28
Q

Where are the guidelines for lump sums for PI found

A

The ogden tables