Privity / third parties Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition / explanation of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

A

Creates an exception to the rule of privity (sits alongside). Gives effect to the intentions of contracting parties (with regard to third party beneficiaries). NB only protects rights, not burdens.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A case where a “trust of a promise” meant that privity need not be present

A

Les Affreteurs reunis (trust was implied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A case where bailment (and sub bailment) was used to circumvent the privity rule

A

Morris v Martin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A case where the concept of agency was employed to circumvent the privity rule

A

Eurymedon - Exclusion cause applied to “agents and employees” of D. D was agent for stevedores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A case where the agency concept could NOT be used to circumvent the privity rule

A

Scruttons v Midland Silicones - stevedores were not party to the contract - NO vicarious immunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The case that puts a limit on negligence being used to circumvent the rule of privity (the price of a contract reflected the allocation of risk, so it was not fair, just and reasonable to imposer liability on the defendant)

A

Norwich City Council v Harvey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Examples of the law of negligence circumventing the privity rule

A

Donoghue v Stevenson; Junior Books; White v Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can the terms of a contract which purports to confer a benefit upon a third party NOT be varied or rescinded

A

UNLESS the contract states otherwise, where the third party has expressly agreed to the term benefiting them, OR the promissor is aware of actual reliance by the third party OR it was reasonably forseeable by the promissor that the third party would rely on the term and the third party has actually done so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the general rule regarding privity?

A

Only a party to a contract can enforce rights or have rights enforced against him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

List as many common law exceptions and workarounds to the rule of privity as you can

A

collateral contract, negligence, agency, bailment, trust of a promise, damages recovered on behalf of a third party, covenants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

An example of a collateral contract working as an exception to the rule of privity

A

Shanklin Pier v Detel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Two cases where a party to a contract was able to recover damages on behalf of third party beneficiaries (one in a domestic context, one commercial)

A

Jackson v Horizon Holidays, Darlington BC v Wiltshire Northern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cases which would be decided differently under the C(RoTP)A

A

Tweddle v Atkinson; Beswick v Beswick; Dunlop v Selfridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A case that shows that Les Affreteurs would not need to rely on a trust of a promise now that we have the C(RoTP)A

A

Nishin Shipping v Cleaves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When can a third party enforce a right bestowed upon them according to the C(RoTP)A

A

When the third party is expressly identified AND a) it is expressly provided for in the contract; OR b) the contract purports to confer a benefit upon them UNLESS it seems from proper construction of the rest of the contract that they weren’t intended to be able to enforce it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Three cases which give authority for the privity rule

A

Tweddle v Atkinson; Beswick v Beswick; Dunlop v Selfridge

17
Q

Cases to which the C(RoTP)A woudl make no difference

A

White v Jones; Eurymedon; Norwich CC v Harvey; Jackson v Horizon Holidays

18
Q

The case that says that a trust of a promise can only be found by the courts when the trust is express

A

Re Schebsman

19
Q

A case that shows that S1(1)(b) C(RoTP)A creates a strong presumption in favour of the third party seeking to rely on it, which it is then up to the contracting parties to rebut

A

Laemthong Glory

20
Q

An example of when a third party couldn’t enforce a contract under C(RoTP)A because they were only implied, not expressly identified

A

Avraamides v Colwill