Tort and Contract LAw Flashcards

1
Q

Tort Law Textbook definition

A

To compensate a party that has suffered damages as a result of intention or unintentional wrongdoing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 key Tort principles

A

Defendant owed plaintiff the duty of care
Defendant breached duty by their conduct
Defendant’s conduct caused injury to plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strict Liability

A

when a defendant is liable for commiting an action regardless of mental state, or intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Vicarious Liability

A

When a supervisory party is liable for the negligent actions of a
third party for whom they are responsible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tort law case format

A

Introduction: what does tort law address, need for contractual relationships?
Analysis: Who’s involved? Were the key principles met?
Liability:
Decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Contractual relationship

A

contractual relationship is a legal bond between at least two people who agree to at least one term or promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Concurrent Tortfeasors

A

A single injury caused by several people acting without common design, and are not joint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negligent

A

Failing to take proper care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duty of Care

A

Legal obligation to provide reasonable amount of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standard of Care

A

the level of care, caution, and
judgment that a reasonable person would exercise in a
particular circumstance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of Tort law

A

Intentional torts: torts against body or property
Nuisance torts: protect against harms to property
Economic torts: fraud, conspiracy, restraint of trade
Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Negligence torts

A

Negligence torts: harms done to people through the failure of another to exercise a certain level of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Concept of contract and 5 elements

A

Legally enforceable agreement between two parties

Offer made and accepted
Mutual intent to enter into contract
Consideration - eg.money
Capacity to contract
Lawful purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Letter of intent

A

Express interest to proceed
if clearly an agreement to agree, it does not constitute a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tort Law Case study dissection tools

A

Does defendant/plaintiff or case contain 3 key principles?
What type of tort is it?
Is there duty of care or standard of care to consider?
Is there negligence?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is a ‘contract’ enforceable

A

Must contain all essential terms

17
Q

Element 3: Consideration

A

Each contracting party must bring something of value
In the sense that an act or promise must be bought or bargained for by another

18
Q

Gratuitous Promise

A

A promise without ‘consideration’/exchange of value
Not legally binding

19
Q

Contract law case study dissection tools

A

Does the contract contain 5 key elements?
Is equitable estoppel a factor?
Interpretation or ambiguities
the doctrine of frustration?

20
Q

equitable estoppel

A

legal principle which means that, in certain cases, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) can order the department to stop doing something because it is not fair to a client i.e. overpayment.

21
Q

Element 4: Capacity

A

Person’s legal ability to enter a contract
eg. minority

22
Q

Misrepresentation

A

False statement of a material fact that affects the other party’s decision to agree

23
Q

Duress

A

If a contract was induced by intimidation, it is voidable

24
Q

Concurrent Liability in Tort and
Contract

A

Plaintiff establishes common law duty of care was owed due to the relationship of proximity to constitute that duty with no policy negating such.

25
Q

Rule of Contra proferentem

A

Where a contract is ambiguous, it will be construed or interpreted against the party that drafted the provision.

26
Q

Parol evidence

A

No additional clauses / extrinsic evidence or consequence can be added to a contract after final agreement in writing.

27
Q

Force majeure

A

unforseeable events

28
Q
A