Topic Test 4 - Part 3A (touch) Flashcards
motor function is divided into vision, vestibular and somatosensory. Describe somatosensory
- distributed all over body
- responds to many kinds of stimuli
- subgrouped into 4 senses:
>touch
>pain
>temp
>proprioception
most somatosensory receptors are _
mechanoreceptors
- receptive to physical distortion
*measure physical distortion, stretch, vibration, pressure
what are the 4 primary receptors in skin
- pacinian corpuscles
- meissner’s corpuscles
- ruffini endings
- merkel’s disks
the primary receptors in the skin vary in terms of
- receptive field (large vs small)
- adaptation (rapid vs. slow)
list the mechanoreceptors from superficial to deep
- merkel’s disk
- meissner’s corpuscle
- ruffini’s ending
- pacinian corpuscle
describe pacinian corpuscles
- largest and deepest mechanoreceptor in skin
- get compressed and detect pressure and vibration
>large receptive field
>rapid adapting
*lots of these in the skin
describe rapid adapting in the context of pacinian corpuscles
- react quickly to inital contact, but not sustained contact
- best at detecting finer textures and high frequency vibrations
describe meissner’s corpuscles
- small receptors in upper dermis: common in fingers
- detect fine touch and pressure
> small receptive field
> rapid adapting
describe rapid adating in the context of meissner’s corpuscles
- react quickly to initial contact, but not sustained contact
- best at detecting heavier textures and lower frequency vibrations
from the rapid adapting mechanoreceptors, which are better at which frequency?
- meissner’s corpuscles better at low frequency (heavier texture, contours/waves are further apart)
- pacinian corpuscles better at high frequency (finer texture, contours/waves are closer together)
give some examples of actions that are interpreted more by meissner’s corpuscles/pacinian corpuscles
meissner’s: moving fingers across keys on a keyboard
pacinian: moving hand across the surface of smooth table
describe ruffini endings
- large receptors in the dermis layer
- detect stretch and deformation
> large receptive field
> slow adapting
describe slow adapting in the context of ruffini endings
- react at sustained deformations
- best at detecting grip/position
ex. pick up water bottle and holding it, it’s job is to continue telliing the brain that there is something still in contact with hand
describe merkel’s disks
- small receptors in epidermis, common in fingers
- detect fine touch and pressure
- small receptive field
- slow adapting
describe slow adapting in the contet of merkel’s disks
- react to sustained deformations
- best at static discrimination of shapes/textures
what mechanoreceptor has a small receptive field and rapid adaptation?
meissner’s corpuscle
what mechanoreceptor has a large receptive field and rapid adaptation?
pacinian corpuscle
what mechanoreceptor has a small receptive field and slow adaptation?
merkel’s disk
what mechanoreceptor has a large receptive field and slow adaptation?
ruffini’s ending
what does the firing rate look like in different mechanoreceptors?
- pacinian: not a lot aside from some axons firing at the beginning and subseqeuent change later
- slow adapting (merkel’s and ruffini’s), see consistent firing (merkel’s more close together at the beginning)
- meissner’s: a lot at beginning, then nothing till end
for each example, name the mechanoreceptor likely responsible:
a) catching football
b) reaching into bag for pen
c) holding hand
a) pacinian, maybe also meissner’s if using more fingers
b) meissner’s (rapid adapting, finger tip)
c) initial contact could be rapid like pacinian, slow adapting when you hold a long time like ruffini
describe 2 point discrimination
- sensitivity to discriminate small points varies greatly across the body
-more sensitive in important places (finger>forearm>calf, more neurons devoted to fingers)
ex. if 2 points pressing into index finger, can tell there are 2 contact points
two point discrimination is accomplished by:
- greater density of mechanoreceptors
- smaller field size (2 Ms - meissner/merkel)
- greater brain tissue devoted to these areas
what’s the argument for barefoot running/walking?
- ability to improve sensory info coming from the feet
- if we are running or walking, will get a lot of info coming from rapid adapters
- if we have minimalist or barefoot shoes, getting more info from these signals that can help improve contact, movement etc